Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Telegram Library

Channel

Telegram Library

@library

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,267subscribers

+252 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693041126
TypeChannel
Username@library
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/library

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,0149,2679,140.56 August 2026 — 9,015 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,014 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,031 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,077 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,113 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,140 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,178 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,214 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,239 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,246 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,237 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,244 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,255 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,267 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,976–9,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:579,267+12
15 Sept 2026, 03:419,255+11
11 Sept 2026, 10:219,244+7
6 Sept 2026, 13:599,237-9
1 Sept 2026, 22:249,246+7
29 Aug 2026, 14:339,239+25
26 Aug 2026, 13:579,214+36
23 Aug 2026, 07:289,178+38
20 Aug 2026, 01:159,140+27
17 Aug 2026, 10:279,113+36
13 Aug 2026, 12:089,077+46
10 Aug 2026, 02:419,031+17
6 Aug 2026, 22:519,014-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:019,015first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

931 reactions across 23 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤62867.5%
💯889.45%
👍656.98%
🔥596.34%
❤‍🔥303.22%
👏161.72%
🤔141.50%
🍾90.967%
💔60.644%
🤣60.644%
🕊50.537%
😢40.43%
🤷‍♂10.107%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 931 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @library. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 February 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,480 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

It's time to pick your next book: @Library

❤13👏3👍2

15 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈3,990 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026

"Human beings are funny. They long to be with the person they love but refuse to admit openly. Some are afraid to show even the slightest sign of affection because of fear. Fear that their feelings may not be recognized, or even worse, returned. But one thing about human beings puzzles me the most: their conscious effort to be connected with the object of their affection even if it kills them slowly within. It is tha…

❤27❤‍🔥3👏2💯2

10 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈5,060 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

4 biographies everyone should read: @Library

❤16💯3👏2👍1

1 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈7,200 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026

What they do not comprehend is man's helplessness. I am weak, small, of no consequence to the universe. It does not notice me; I live on unseen. But why is that bad? Isn't it that way? Whom the gods notice they destroy. Be small… and you will escape the jealousy of the great. – Philip K. Dick, The Man in the High Castle @Library

❤19💯5👍3

20 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC≈9,670 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026

10 books to think like a strategic genius: 1) The Art of War by Sun Tzu 2) On Grand Strategy by John Lewis Gaddis 3) The Art of Action by Stephen Bungay 4) Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace by Edward Luttwak 5) Good Strategy Bad Strategy by Richard Rumelt 6) The Strategy of Conflict by Thomas Schelling 7) The Art of Strategy by Avinash Dixit & Barry Nalebuff 8) The Dictator's Handbook by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita &…

❤20💯4👏3

15 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈9,740 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026

"There is something at the bottom of every new human thought, every thought of genius, or even every earnest thought that arises in any mind, which cannot be communicated to others, even if one were to write volumes about it and explain it for thirty-five years. Something always remains unexpressed, something that remains in the mind forever and with which one dies, without having communicated it to anyone." – Fyodo…

❤31💯4😢4

10 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC≈10,000 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

9 books to increase your lifespan: @Library

❤18👍4💯3

1 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈11,200 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the pal…

❤14💯13👍3👏1🔥1

20 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC≈11,400 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

3 books to understand why you're always tired: @Library

❤15👍5💯3

15 Jun 2026, 15:02 UTC≈12,100 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Rule 12: Pet a cat when you encounter one on the street. - 12 Rules for Life by Jordan Peterson @Library

❤25🤣6🕊5👍2

10 Jun 2026, 15:05 UTC≈11,600 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026

6 books every aspiring founder should read: 1. Zero to One by Peter Thiel 2. The Lean Startup by Eric Ries 3. The Mom Test by Rob Fitzpatrick 4. Founders at Work by Jessica Livingston 5. Disciplined Entrepreneurship by Bill Aulet 6. The Hard Thing About Hard Things by Ben Horowitz @Library

❤20🤔6👍5💯1🤷‍♂1

1 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC≈13,100 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026

“I like people too much or not at all. I've got to go down deep, to fall into people, to really know them.” – Sylvia Plath @Library

❤38🔥5💯4❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @library. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Without Hype
@Crypto_Without_Hype · 51,186
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Telegram Library” (@library), 9,267 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/library.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.