Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نظامی نیوز📡

Channel

نظامی نیوز📡

@NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

180,898subscribers

-2,435 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001277347123
TypeChannel
Username@NEZAMI_NEWS_IR
Description🚨رسانه رسمی نظامی نیوز تبلیغات: @NEZAMI_AD پشتیبانی گروه: @NEZAMI_GAP_BOT ارسال سوژه و نظرات: @NEZAMI_NEWS_BOT
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

180,898183,333182,115.56 August 2026 — 183,333 subscribers6 August 2026 — 183,155 subscribers7 August 2026 — 182,923 subscribers8 August 2026 — 182,699 subscribers9 August 2026 — 182,498 subscribers10 August 2026 — 182,331 subscribers11 August 2026 — 182,219 subscribers12 August 2026 — 181,980 subscribers13 August 2026 — 181,744 subscribers14 August 2026 — 181,395 subscribers16 August 2026 — 181,131 subscribers17 August 2026 — 180,898 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -2,435. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180,533–183,698 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:24180,898-233
16 Aug 2026, 08:55181,131-264
14 Aug 2026, 23:35181,395-349
13 Aug 2026, 14:07181,744-236
12 Aug 2026, 13:26181,980-239
11 Aug 2026, 12:43182,219-112
10 Aug 2026, 13:51182,331-167
9 Aug 2026, 12:35182,498-201
8 Aug 2026, 15:44182,699-224
7 Aug 2026, 18:07182,923-232
6 Aug 2026, 19:46183,155-178
6 Aug 2026, 03:04183,333first reading

Engagement

494 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.15%
avg views ÷ 180,898 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
494 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
494
of 494 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 477 of 494 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held494 (5 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total5,499,912
Reactions total56,897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
45,800
Videos
12,000
Links
2,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

55,214 reactions across 457 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬13,42924.3%
🔥11,79721.4%
👍11,18220.3%
🥴4,7008.51%
🤩3,8496.97%
❤‍🔥1,9993.62%
👎1,8783.40%
💔1,3422.43%
👏1,0641.93%
😍7451.35%
🤝6641.20%
😎6411.16%
😐4730.857%
🗿3260.59%
💯2260.409%
🤔1960.355%
🫡1410.255%
😱1200.217%
🤯1050.19%
😢980.177%
7 further kinds2390.433%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 477 of the 494 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,897reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 494 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 494 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 494 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC≈2,450 views50 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🚨🚨 #فوری | یک کشتی باری با پرچم اندونزی در باب‌المندب، در جنوب یمن مورد حمله قرار گرفت 🔻یمن اعلام کرد این شناور حامل تجهیزات نظامی متعلق به عربستان بود 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

🔥44🤩3💔2🤬1

17 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC≈5,410 views49 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔴 #مهم | سی‌بی‌اس: 🔻مذاکرات بین ایالات متحده و ایران همچنان در بن‌بست قرار دارد، پس از پایان مهلت مذاکرات ۶۰ روزه، و سرنوشت از سرگیری تردد دریایی از طریق تنگه هرمز همچنان نامشخص است‼️ 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

🤩37👍8💯3😍1

17 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC≈6,320 views104 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🔴 #تکمیلی | مسئول امنیتی کتائب حزب الله عراق موسوم به ابومجاهد العساف اعلام کرد، شروط مقاومت اسلامی عراق برای گفتگو با دولت عبارت‌اند از: 🔻خروج کامل نیروهای آمریکایی و پایان سلطه اقتصادی-سیاسی آمریکا، اخراج نیروهای ترکیه از شمال عراق، و انحلال نیروهای پیشمرگه کرد به‌دلیل ارتباطات مشکوک با آمریکا و اسرائیل‼️ 🔻او همچنین نخست‌وزیر علی الزیدی را به پیروی از توصیه‌های تام باراک متهم کرد و از اقدامات تحریک‌آمیز علیه خان

👍89🤬6🫡4🥴3❤‍🔥2

17 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC≈7,120 views140 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🚨🚨 #فوری | مسئول امنیتی کتائب حزب الله عراق «ابومجاهد العساف» در طی بیانیه ای اعلام کرد: 🔻شروط مقاومت اسلامی عراق برای مذاکره شامل خروج نیروهای آمریکایی و ترکیه ای و انحلال نیروهای کرد پیشمرگه است‼️ 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

👍125🥴6🤬5💯2🔥2

17 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC≈7,850 views96 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🔴 #مهم | تصاویر آتش سوزی بسیار عظیم ناشی از انفجار یک مخزن سوخت در سلیمانیه عراق 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

🤩73👍9🔥9🤬3👎1😐1

17 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈9,570 views89 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🚨🚨 #فوری | مرکز رسانه‌ای امنیتی عراق: 🔻جنگنده‌های نیروی هوایی این کشور با استفاده از هواپیماهای F-16، دو حمله هوایی موفق و دقیق علیه هدف تعیین‌شده انجام دادند‼️ 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

🔥56🤔22😍7👍4

17 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈9,470 views66 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🚨🚨 #فوری | شنیده شدن دو صدای انفجار در سلیمانیه عراق 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

👍62🤬3🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈10,000 views78 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🚨🚨 #فوری | گزارشاتی از حملات پهپادی به سلیمانیه عراق 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

👍60💯8🔥7🤬3

17 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC≈10,300 views118 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔴 #مهم | ترامپ تصویری از رهبر کره شمالی منتشر کرده است در حالی که پای تلفن می گوید: "سلام ترامپ، ما فوق‌العاده هستیم، نه؟" 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

🥴91😐15🗿5🤬2🤯2👍1🔥1😍1

17 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC≈10,800 views76 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔴 #مهم | هم اكنون، چهار هواپيماى سوخت رسان آمريكايى همزمان از فرودگاه بن گوريون در تل آويو اشغالى برخاستند و به سمت تنگه هرمز در حركت هستند 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

🤬38😐28👍7😍2👎1

17 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC≈11,000 views54 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔴 #مهم | روزنامه‌نگار بریتانیایی: 🔻آمریکا و اسرائیل آتش‌بس‌ها را نادیده می‌گیرند چون می‌توانند چنین کنند و چون در طول تاریخ، این رفتار طرف قدرتمندتر بوده است‼️ 🔻لویی چهاردهم: بندی در توافق بگنجانید که هر زمان بتوان به‌راحتی آن را نقض کرد‼️ 🔻تاریخ نگار یونانی توسیدید: قدرتمندان هر کاری را که بتوانند انجام می‌دهند و ناتوانان آنچه را که باید، تحمل می‌کنند‼️ 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

👍36👎12🔥3😎2🤩1

17 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC≈11,800 views55 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔴 #مهم | خودداری چند فروند هواپیمای مسافربری از فرود در فرودگاه دبی و چرخیدن آن‌ها در آسمان به دلایل نامشخص 🚨رسانه رسمی #نظامی_نیوز☑️ @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR

🔥39🤩9🤬7

Showing the 12 most recent of 494 posts we hold for @NEZAMI_NEWS_IR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 52,358 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نظامی نیوز📡” (@NEZAMI_NEWS_IR), 180,898 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEZAMI_NEWS_IR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.