چه کسی میداند؟ که تو در پیله ی تنهایی خود، تنهــــایی؟ چه کسی می داند؟ که تو در حسرت یک روزنه در فردایــی؟ پیله ات را بگشا، تو به اندازه ی پروانه شدن زیبایــی. ... ازصداي گذر آب چنان فهمیدم: تندتر ازآب روان، عمرگران میگذرد. زندگی را نفسی، ارزش غم خوردن نيست ! آرزویم این است آنقدرسيربخندي كه ندانی غم چيست🙏💐 #سهراب_سپهری ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whatsap_Story

Channel
استوری اینستاگرام وضعیت واتساپ
@whatsap_Story
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,555subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001275035820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whatsap_Story |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whatsap_Story |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 8,555 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 8,571 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 8,582 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 8,582 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.1%
- avg views ÷ 8,555 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,030
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (24 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 27,859 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 39s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
زَن ها میمانند تا پای مرگ؛ حاضرند رنگ خوشبختی نبینند، امّا کنار مَردی باشند که عاشقش هستند.. گاهی در کنارش بنشین لازم نیست که چیزی بگویی فقط باش و تکیه گاهش شو قوی ترین زنان هم گاهی نیاز به تکیه گاهی دارند تکیه گاهی امن که ته دلشان را قرص کند ارزش زن بسیار بیشتر از این حرف هاست که او را به حال خود وا گذاری و از کنارش بگذری روزی که این کار را بکنی، بدان که محبت را در دل زن خواهی کشت و او دیگر نسبت به تو مانند گذشته نخ…
بزرگترین کتابخونهی تلگرام منبع دانلود رایگان PDF کتاب؛ @Library
در این شب زیبا آرزویم این است که صفحهی غم و اندوه در دفتر زندگیتان همیشه سفید بماند.. اوقاتتون به وقت مهربانی لبخندتون بـه رنگ عشق 💫شبتون دور از دلتنگی 💫و در پناه خدای مهربان ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whatsap_Story
دلم برای خانه ای تنگ است ... که تمام خندههای کودکیم را در آن جا نهاده ام ... تمام بازیهایم.. تمام قد کشیدنهایم و تمام آرامشم... دلم برای خانهای تنگ است امروز که تمام رازهای دیروزم را درش جا نهادهام... تمام شیطنتها و سادگیهای کودکانهام.. تمام همبازیهای کودکیم و تمام قصههای شنیدنی زندگیم را ... دلم برای خانه ای تنگ است امروز که تا همیشه میدانم که نخواهمش دید.. ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whats…
گاهی همون جایی که باید ترس باشه آرامش پیدا میشه...! مثل این پرنده که روی دوش مترسک نشسته انگار فهمیده هیچ خطری نیست. زندگی هم همینه؛ وقتی دلت قرص باشه حتی روی شونههای ترس هم میتونی آروم بگیری. ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whatsap_Story
🚨 نم و نشتی را یکبار برای همیشه تمام کنید! 🚨 💧 سقف یا دیوار نم داده؟ 💧 ایزوگام قدیمی دوباره نشتی کرده؟ 💧 از هزینههای تکراری خسته شدهاید؟ وقتشه از عایق نانو کیمیا گستر استفاده کنید؛ راهکاری مدرن، بادوام و مقرونبهصرفه برای محافظت از ساختمان شما. ✨ مزایای عایق نانو: ✅ آببندی ۱۰۰٪ و تضمین جلوگیری از نفوذ آب ✅ عایق حرارتی و برودتی؛ کاهش مصرف انرژی ✅ مقاوم در برابر آفتاب، باران، سرما و گرمای شدید ✅ ضد ترک، ضد پوست…
برای همدیگه دعاهای قشنگ کنیم ﺩﻋﺎ کنیم هیچ کس ﺩﻟﺶ ﻧﮕﯿﺮﻩ، ﺍﮔﻪ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺧﺪﺍ ﯾﻪ هم صحبت ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺬﺍﺭﻩ ﺳﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺶ! ﺩﻋﺎ کنیم که هیچ کس ﺍﺷﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﺵ ﻧﯿﺎﺩ، ﺍگه هم اﻭﻣﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﻪ! ﺩﻋﺎ کنیم هیچ کس ﺩﻟﺶ ﭘُﺮ ﻧﺸﻪ، ﺍﮔﻪ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺮ ﺷﺪ، ﭘﺮ ﺑﺸﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻟﯽ! ﺩﻋﺎ کنیم هیچ کس ﻧﺎ ﺍﻣﯿﺪ ﻧﺸﻪ، ﺍﮔﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ، ﺧﺪﺍ ﺯﻭﺩ ﯾﻪ ﺍﻣﯿﺪ ﺩﯾﮕﻪ ﺑﻬﺶ ﺑﺪﻩ! ﺩﻋﺎ کنیم ﻫﺮ ﮐﯽ ﻫﺮ ﭼﯽ ﺗﻮ ﺩﻟﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻬﺶ ﺑﺮﺳﻪ! الهی که حکمت خدا با آرزوهامون یکی باشه ❄️کانال استوری اینستا…
از سری توصیه های طلایی.... از همون اول بیشتر از ظرفیت آدما بهشون بده تا بفهمی با کی طرفی وگرنه تا آخر عمر مجبوری با سیاست باهاش برخورد کنی آخرشم نه اون میفهمه تو براش چیکار کردی نه تو میفهمی اون آدمت بوده یا نه👌 ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whatsap_Story
همیشه سکوت نشانه ی تایید حرف طرف مقابل نیست. گاهی نشانه ی قطع امید از سطح شعور اوست ...! میشل فوکو ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whatsap_Story
این جمله به شاید به معنای اینکه روزهای تاریک و پر از غمی که الان در آن هستید، ابدی نیست. روزی میرسد که در همانجایی که امروز دلشکسته هستید، احساس قدرت و شادی خواهید کرد و آن رنجها دیگر شما را آزار نخواهند داد...🌱✌🏻 ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whatsap_Story
حیا، زیباترین زینت یک زن است؛ زینتی که نه با زمان کهنه میشود و نه با مد از ارزش میافتد. زن با حیا، ارزش خود را به نگاه دیگران گره نمیزند؛ او میداند وقار، سکوتِ بهجا، متانت و احترام به خویشتن، گرانبهاتر از هر زیبایی ظاهری است. ❄️کانال استوری اینستاگرام/وضعیت واتساپ👇 📸 @whatsap_Story
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @whatsap_Story. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,250,409 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AhangeeNaab · 105,362
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“استوری اینستاگرام وضعیت واتساپ” (@whatsap_Story), 8,555 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whatsap_Story.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.