اللّٰهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّد
❤12💘8

Channel
@WELCOMtoLIBRARY
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26,406subscribers
-272 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002250772674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WELCOMtoLIBRARY |
| Description | Привет - @Durov Эта группа не нарушает закон. И никаких порнографических или грубых постов.Пожалуйста,обратитевнимание! Наш официальный канал- @Telegram Без спам порнографии |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WELCOMtoLIBRARY |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 26,406 | -42 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 26,448 | -54 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 26,502 | -47 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 26,549 | -38 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 26,587 | -53 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 26,640 | -38 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 26,678 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 26,678 | first reading |
78 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (4 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 46,599 |
| Reactions total | 1,494 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,494 reactions across 78 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,082 | 72.4% | |
| 😁 | 80 | 5.35% | |
| 🍓 | 46 | 3.08% | |
| 😭 | 44 | 2.95% | |
| 🤣 | 39 | 2.61% | |
| 🗿 | 25 | 1.67% | |
| 🕊 | 24 | 1.61% | |
| 💘 | 23 | 1.54% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 1.47% | |
| 😢 | 19 | 1.27% | |
| ⚡ | 17 | 1.14% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 1.14% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 0.803% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 0.602% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.535% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 0.402% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 0.402% | |
| 🤓 | 5 | 0.335% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.201% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.201% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.268% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اللّٰهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّد
❤12💘8
📦 المنتجات المتوفرة: ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 Gemini Pro 18 Months ✨ حساب Capcut Pro 🎓 Coursera Premium Access – 1 Year 💼 ChatGPT Business Invite 🤖 Gamma Pro 12m 🤖 Supabase Pro 12m 🤖 Higgsfield Pro 12m 🤖 N8N Starter 12m | $18.00 🤖 Cursor Pro 12 Months 🤖 Notion Business 12m 🤖 Runway Pro 12m 🤖 Replit Core 12 months 🤖 Gumloop Pro 12 months 🤖 Jam Team 10 Seat 12m 🤖 ElevenLabs Creator 12m 🤖 Granola Business 12 months 🤖 Ch…
❤4🗿3👨💻1
Signed souheib
✅في الموضوع أكتب هكذا: 1⃣تحويل داخلي: أرغب في الاستفادة من إمكانية التحويل الجامعي، حيث إنني طالب جديد وقد أخطأت في اختيار التخصص أثناء التسجيل والتوجيه الأولي، وأرغب في تصحيح اختياري والانتقال إلى التخصص الذي أراه أكثر ملاءمة لرغبتي وتوجهي الدراسي. لذلك ألتمس منكم قبول طلب التحويل، وتمكيني من الالتحاق بالتخصص الذي اخترته، وشكرًا لتفهمكم 2⃣هذا تحويل خارجي الذي لا يملك شهادة الإقامة و يريد دراسة تخصص لا يوجد في ولاي…
❤9
Signed ĸiʅa
| لازم تفرقوا بين : | ⏣ بطاقة اقامة ⏣ شهادة اقامة ⏣ شهادة الايواء 🔴 الجديد هذه السنة من موقع التحويلات الجامعية بطاقة اقامة و شهادة الايواء مرفوضة تقبل فقط شهادة اقامة !! عكس السنوات الماضية كانت تقبل كل من شهادة اقامة وبطاقة اقامة و شهادة الايواء #𝘽𝘼𝙔𝙀𝙆 المالك @UNIVDZ_N1 القناة
🍓6❤2🥰1
Signed ĸiʅa
دخلو عند سهمين ذوك
❤6
كاين لخرجلو وكاين لا. منعرف شبيه سيت
❤11
🌟🌟: تم فتح موقع التحويلات الجامعية الطلبة الجدد
❤16
دعواتكم لأمي بالشفاء 😔💔
💔14❤6😭6🍓2
🍞 الخبز الأبيض: طاقة سريعة.. لكنها فارغة! ⚠️ 🧪 أولاً: مكونات خطيرة يُصنع من دقيق أبيض مكرّر (مجرد من النخالة والألياف)، وماء، وملح 🧂، وخميرة، وغالباً يُضاف إليه سكر ودهون مهدرجة 🛢️ ومحسّنات خبز. 🩺 ثانياً: أبرز الأمراض الناتجة · 📈 ارتفاع السكر المفاجئ: يتحول بسرعة إلى سكر في الدم، ويرهق البنكرياس. · ⚖️ السمنة: سعرات فارغة تزيد الشهية وتضعف الشعور بالشبع. · ❤️ أمراض القلب: يرفع الدهون الثلاثية والكوليسترول الضار. · 🧠 …
❤9🗿4
اللّٰهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّد
❤10💘2
وش هو التخصص لباغي تحول ليه❔❗️
❤7
Posted without readable text
❤9
Signed Future doctor
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @WELCOMtoLIBRARY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
لتعلّم مادة الإعلام الآلي، يُعدّ وجود الحاسوب ضروريًا جدًا من أجل التطبيق، لأن هذه المادة تعتمد أساسًا على الجانب العملي.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 114,371 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WELCOMtoLIBRARY named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📚 المكتبة / 𝑳𝐈𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐑𝐘” (@WELCOMtoLIBRARY), 26,406 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WELCOMtoLIBRARY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.