🟢رسانه فرمول یک نیوز ایران، رسانه فارسی زبان تخصصی فرمول یک.
اینستاگرام: http://instagram.com/f1newsir
سایت : https://f1newsir.com/
ارتباط : @adf1newsir
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,424–18,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 00:18
18,426
-9
13 Aug 2026, 12:37
18,435
+3
12 Aug 2026, 11:44
18,432
-1
11 Aug 2026, 08:28
18,433
-7
10 Aug 2026, 11:53
18,440
-1
10 Aug 2026, 01:16
18,441
first reading
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 18,426 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,300
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 73 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
74 (7 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
244,407
Reactions total
4,153
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈22,700
Videos
≈2,040
Links
≈7,290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 09s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,153 reactions across 73 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,034
24.9%
👍
739
17.8%
🔥
474
11.4%
👎
339
8.16%
💔
312
7.51%
🤣
240
5.78%
😍
151
3.64%
🤯
136
3.27%
😨
118
2.84%
❤🔥
115
2.77%
👀
112
2.70%
🤝
91
2.19%
🌚
79
1.90%
🕊
74
1.78%
👏
73
1.76%
🤓
27
0.65%
😭
13
0.313%
😢
12
0.289%
🏆
6
0.144%
🫡
4
0.096%
2 further kinds
4
0.096%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 74 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @f1newsir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 74 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🟣اظهارات بریاتوره درباره رویکرد اساسی در تشکیل تیم #F1 آلپین:
همه میدونن که استون مارتین بهترین متخصصان جهان را دارد، استرول یک پایگاه جدید در سیلورستون ساخته و... اما این تضمینی برای نتایج نیست. به همین دلیل، ما هرگز یک "غول" را به تیم دعوت نخواهیم کرد.
از تیم ما، راس براون، باب بل، پت سیمونز و جیمز الیسون خارج شدند. ما راه خود را قبلا پیدا کردهایم و به دنبال چهرههای مشهور از بیرون نیستیم‼️
ترسم نرسی به کعبه ای …
📺#گرندپریTV
👈🟣14 مانور دفاعی فوقالعاده در تاریخ مسابقات فرمول یک
👈🟣خلاصه مسابقه شانزدهم فرمول ئی لندن ۲۰۲۶
👈🟣بهترین سبقت های رقابت های استقامتی فصل ۲۰۲۶
👈🟣 انضباط فردی، ساخت هویت و ابرقدرتی به نام فاصلهگیری ذهنی
ẞ
🟢فرمول یک نیوز ایران|
🏎 @F1newsir
🌟دقیقاً ۵۰ سال پیش، ما شاهد بودیم که یک زن، لِلا لمباردی، برای آخرین بار در یک مسابقه فرمول یک شرکت کرد.
👩🏻تا به امروز، او همچنان تنها زنی است که توانسته در مسابقات #F1 امتیاز کسب کند.
للا راننده تیم های مارچ، ویلیامز و RAM بود✅
ẞ
🟢فرمول یک نیوز ایران|
🏎 @F1newsir
🇧🇷گابریل بورتولتو وفاداری خود به آئودی را نشان میدهد:
قصد ما یک پروژه بلندمدت است.
من یک قرارداد بلندمدت با آئودی دارم. سال آینده با آئودی خواهم بود، و نه فقط سال آینده، بلکه سالهای بعد هم.قصدم با آئودی، همانطور که همیشه از ابتدا گفتهام، یک پروژه بلندمدت هست؛ ماتیا (بینوتو) همیشه از ادامه تا ۲۰۳۰ صحبت میکند. پس ما هم به آن افق نگاه میکنیم.
ẞ
🟢فرمول یک نیوز ایران|
🏎 @F1newsir
در حالی که همه به نظر میرسد آکادمی #F1 بانوان را فراموش کردهاند، زنان همچنان در تلاش برای ورود به فرمول یک هستند!
به تازگی از مربی بورټولتو، که در زمینه آمادگی جسمانی فعالیت میکند، در مورد کمبود زنان در فرمول یک سوال شد؟
ما به موضوع هورمونها توجه میکنیم، که همانطور که میدانیم، میتوانند مشکلاتی ایجاد کنند، مانند دورههای قاعدگی و..
مدتی پیش با برونا تومازلی کار میکردم و ما در مورد این مسائل صحبت میکردیم.اما …
😬جانی هربرت حدس زد که نیوی در #F1 دیگر آنطورها که قبلاً بود نیست:
به دلایلی، آدرین نتوانست تیمی را گرد هم بیاورد که بتواند ماشینی خوب یا خودرویی بسازد که حداقل تا حدی با خواستههای تیم و منابع آن مطابقت داشته باشد. جالب است که آیا این پایان کار آدرین نیوی است، یا اولین نشانهای از این است که او دیگر انگیزه خود را از دست داده است؟ چنین اتفاقی حتی برای بهترینها در ورزش هم میافتد.
موافقید یا نیوی در آخر همه رو از ای…
💎🟢 قبول درخواست #تبلیغات کسب و کار و برند شما در کانال، ربات کانال و پیج و وبسایت فرمول یک نیوز ایران با بهترین قیمت و بیشترین بازدید.برای رزرو کافیست به ایدی زیر پیام بدهید👇
✅💬@bravestburak
🟠مکلارن در طراحی MCL40 برای فصل ۲۰۲۶ فاصله محوری خودرو را بیش از حد کوتاه در نظر گرفته که هدف اصلی آن کاهش وزن و رسیدن به حداقل وزن مجاز بوده است.
📐با این حال، این تصمیم باعث شده کفی خودرو کوچکتر شود و تیم نتواند به اندازه کافی از پتانسیل آیرودینامیکی آن استفاده کند.همین موضوع آزادی عمل مکلارن برای توسعه داونفورس را محدود کرده و تیم مجبور شده با آپدیتهای مختلف این ضعف را جبران کند.
🌟 در برخی شرایط نیز #F1 مرسد…
🟡پیرلی به توسعه تایر «سوپر اینترمیدیت» فرمول یک ادامه میدهد:
🌧️ پیرلی همچنان در حال کار بر روی مفهوم جدیدی از تایر مناسب هوای بارانی است که میتواند به طور بالقوه جایگزین تایرهای فعلی اینترمدیت و فول وت یا کاملا خیس با یک تایر خیس واحد و مناسب شود.
🛞هدف، ایجاد تایری است که قادر به پوشش دامنه وسیعتری از شرایط خیس باشد و حذف تقاطع دشوار بین تایرهای اینترمدیت و کاملاً خیس.
⚠️ توسعه پس از لغو تست خیس برنامهریزیشده…
❤14👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @f1newsir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 116,544 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فرمول یک نیوز ایران” (@f1newsir), 18,426 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f1newsir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.