Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

БЛОКНОТ ФИЛОСОФА

@philosnote

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,556subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001523592638
TypeChannel
Username@philosnote
DescriptionМедиа ОП «Практическая философия» НИУ ВШЭ. Здесь мы публикуем информацию о предстоящих мероприятиях, конференциях и новых исследованиях в области философии. Предложить публикацию/связаться — bloknotfilosofa@gmail.com или @stoklishko
Created6 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/philosnote

Growth

4,5484,5564,5526 August 2026 — 4,548 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,550 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,552 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,556 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,547–4,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:174,556+4
9 Aug 2026, 06:424,552+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:004,550+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:184,548first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 4,556 subscribers
Avg views / post
756
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held15 (26 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total11,347
Reactions total177
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,470
Videos
2
Links
2,250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7647.8%
🔥3018.9%
❤‍🔥2213.8%
🎉1710.7%
🐳127.55%
💔10.629%
😍10.629%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC299 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📖VII Веберовская конференция «Хозяйство и общество» 📌Центр фундаментальной социологии НИУ ВШЭ и журнал «Социологическое обозрение» проводят очередную конференцию, посвященную актуальным вопросам анализа современного общества в перспективе классической социологии! 💡К участию в дискуссии приглашаются исследователи в области теоретической и экономической социологии, социальной философии, интеллектуальной истории и сме

4❤‍🔥1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC444 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📖 Дайджест научных мероприятий! 1️⃣ Международная конференция «Науки о религии в зеркале современности» Конференция организована в память профессора М. М. Шахнович и посвящена современным проблемам наук о религии. В рамках конференции планируется проведение секций по темам: «Философия религии»; «Наука и религия»; «Религиозные образы и сюжеты в пространстве культуры»; «Методологические проблемы современного религио

5

7 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC669 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💜 Продолжаем знакомить вас с аспектами практики на нашей программе! 🌀 Сегодня рассказ студента 3 курса ОП «Практическая Философия» Виктора Голубева о прохождении практики в секторе этики Института Философии РАН! ✏️ О том, какие задачи выполняет студент-философ в ИФ РАН в сегодняшних карточках! Приятного чтения! #практиканафилосе@philosnote

8🔥8

6 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC930 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📖Международная научная конференция «Философская антропология и психоанализ: археология субъекта» к 170-летию З. Фрейда и 100-летию М. Фуко 💡Основные темы:  – К возможности психоаналитической философии и философского психоанализа – Философские основания психоанализа и психоаналитические истоки философии  – Перспективы психоаналитических исследований в философских, гуманитарных и социальных науках – Философские и

5

4 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC779 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📖 Философско-сатирический диалог Дени Дидро «Племянник Рамо» и китайский спор о природе человека 📖Циничный Рамо с предельной откровенностью обнажает свои пороки, заставляя задуматься: не есть ли эгоизм подлинная природа человека, а добродетель — лишь искусственная маска? Этот вопрос перекликается с древним китайским спором: Мэн-цзы верил, что человек от рождения добр, а Сюнь-цзы считал, что его натура зла и нуждаетс

6❤‍🔥6

4 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC751 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎓 25 июня состоялась торжественная церемония вручения дипломов бакалаврам программы «Философия» 2026 года! 📌Выпускной факультета гуманитарных наук прошёл в Культурном центре НИУ ВШЭ. Церемонии начались с видеороликов о студенческих годах и гимна Gaudeamus, после чего с напутствием к выпускникам обратился декан ФГН Феликс Евгеньевич Ажимов. ⭐️ Затем выступили со словами и руководители Школ, и академические руководит

🎉1712🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC617 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✏️ Новый месяц – новый дайджест! 1️⃣ Междисциплинарная конференция «Наша прелесть: воображаемые миры в литературе и их отражение в медиа» Конференция посвящена вопросам памяти и истории, языка и перевода, коллективного культурного опыта, которые возникают в пространствах воображаемых миров и находят отражение в умах людей. Планируется обсуждение широкого спектра тем: эстетика безобразного, категории добра и зла в в

3🔥3🐳2

1 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC729 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📚 Подача рукописей в спецвыпуск «Утопия вчера, сегодня и завтра» журнала «Метод»! 📌Тема спецвыпуска — утопия в её теоретическом и историческом измерениях, рассмотренная в контексте марксистской и постмарксистской мысли. 📌Тематические блоки: — Утопия и субъект: какого субъекта требует реализация утопии? Какого субъекта создает утопия? Психоаналитические, постмарксистские и иные подходы к вопросу о субъекте утопичес

5🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC876 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❗️Осталось меньше недели для подачи заявок на международную конференцию «Философия, культура, ценности в современном мире»! 📌Конференция состоится 26–27 октября 2026 года. Мероприятие пройдёт на базе Школы философии и культурологии НИУ ВШЭ. 📌На конференцию приглашаются культурологи, искусствоведы, философы, филологи, социологи, специалисты в области урбанистики, медиа, дизайна и аудиовизуальных исследований. 📌 Сре

5

30 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC855 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Диалектический подкаст от Ольги Алиевой и Сони Порфирьевой. Мы не очень верим, что философию можно пересказать: самое интересное начинается, когда текст читают вместе. Когда есть время остановиться, поспорить, не согласиться, вернуться на страницу назад или, наоборот, уйти далеко в сторону — и неожиданно понять, зачем вообще был нужен этот разговор. ⭐️ В уже вышедших выпусках подискутировали о роли страха и надежды

10❤‍🔥10🔥6💔1

29 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC984 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️Мы знаем, как вы проведёте вечер четверга! 📌30 июля в 19:00 в Тихвинском храме состоится лекция «Политическая теология Средневековья: как понимали власть?» 👤 Лекцию проведёт Александр Владимирович Марей – доцент Школы философии и культурологии НИУ ВШЭ 🌎Мероприятие пройдёт по адресу: улица Серпуховской Вал, 16 ❤️До встречи! #полезныематериалы@philosnote #нашипреподаватели@philosnote

🐳9❤‍🔥53😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @philosnote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,907 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БЛОКНОТ ФИЛОСОФА” (@philosnote), 4,556 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philosnote.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.