Sticker, posted without a caption
👾3
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋

Channel
@MapleAutumn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
618subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002068078215 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MapleAutumn |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MapleAutumn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 618 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 612 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,074 |
| Reactions total | 33 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
33 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 54.5% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 27.3% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
👾3
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
📣Maple检测1.2.6版本全量发布! [🌹更新内容] ✅依据玄学还原的检测,补齐了免解设备检测与改机型检测! ✅修复了部分机型误报问题 ✅根据某软件玄学检测逻辑 新增20+检测项在Ultra检测中 ✅重点增加了零宽扫盘的检测与扫描 新增扫盘检测 ✅体验优化:现在进入应用默认开启Ultra模式 避免扫描不全 ✅修复部分误报项
❤3👍2
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍4❤1
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
咋了呀
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
是否加强检测?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
📣Maple检测1.1.0全量版本更新! [😉更新内容] ✅新增机型伪装识别 系统属性一致性交叉验证 ✅针对10余个游戏与应用检测 补充了检测深度 还原检测逻辑 ✅修改了设备指纹唯一ID生成逻辑 补充还原极限应用ID留存机制 ✅包名检测重构:现用户可在检测结果页面自行控制开关,默认开启;开启状态下覆盖更多包名与残留扫描项 ✅公告优化:已关闭的公告不再重复弹出,仅内容更新后再次提醒 ✅新增检测完成后的帮助入口,可跳转至 Maple检测问题解决文档 (GitHub) ✅修复跨检测页切换时扫描卡在0%的问题
👍3❤1
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
别问设备ID怎么解决了! 把我的设备ID解决了你的设备ID就解决了😙 重装清理任何方式都可以试试🌹
❤2🥰1
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
✅Maple激活检测验证
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
📣Maple检测-专门针对高阶运行环境的检测! ⭐检测针对日常/游戏两大类使用场景开发检测,不同场景完全不同检测机制,适合不同用户 解决即可解决所有环境问题! 😀目前的检测都太广太泛 大多数检测并没有还原检测机制 没有参考意义 造成了通过检测-仍然有某些问题 某些设备完全通过不了所有检测-参考意义低 ⚠️本检测通过玄学手段 完整还原了日常/游戏应用的检测链路 ⭐普通模式通过后 代表你已经通过基础环境 使用正常风控类APP不会出现问题 ⭐Ultra模式代表着检测较严格的APP 通过后代表你不再会被误封(三方,修改等各种各样莫名的环境问题 找不到是如何导致的) 通过本检测Ultra⭐模式代表着你可以正常使用网银类APP,各类游戏(例如牛角洲,王者等)则不再会出现环境导致的三方/修改类问题 检测中均附有详细解决办法 欢迎各位在评论区反馈! 注:设备指纹分区还原了某牛角和绝大多数的设备ID记录机制😉 欢迎各位挑战
❤4
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
✅30一个CCMax 20x账号 家宽 @MapleAdm
❤1
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
#公益! CCMax免费!!速蹬 用完即止🤩
❤2
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
预告 还原了某牛角的设备ID记录机制😉 欢迎各位挑战 敬请期待
❤3
Signed 枫秋秋秋秋秋
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MapleAutumn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
是否加强检测?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 233,372 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“芙芙的小窝” (@MapleAutumn), 618 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MapleAutumn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.