🔍TG最强资源库 类似于百度 想要什么都能在这里找到 比如:公益科技辅助 各种各样的涩片 🥰 🥰 🥰 🥰 点击下方进入📱 👑 https://t.me/qcfx66 💬 https://t.me/qclflove
👍6❤1😍1
Signed TGBot

Channel
@qcrja
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37,783subscribers
+2,259 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002360232987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qcrja |
| Description | 广告位/合作 @qcmjw 每天一更新分享有用的文件 本频道会持续更新质量公益 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qcrja |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 37,783 | -31 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 37,814 | +19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 37,795 | +66 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 37,729 | +112 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 37,617 | -29 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 37,646 | +224 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 37,422 | +53 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 37,369 | +34 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 37,335 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 37,323 | +21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 37,302 | +53 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 37,249 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 37,245 | +14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 37,231 | +84 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 37,147 | +36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 37,111 | +77 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 37,034 | +43 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 36,991 | +93 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 36,898 | +71 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 36,827 | first reading |
673 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 673 (3 August 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 88,514 |
| Reactions total | 3,069 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 03:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,932 reactions across 651 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,812 | 69.4% | |
| ❤ | 698 | 10.1% | |
| 😍 | 502 | 7.24% | |
| 🥰 | 451 | 6.51% | |
| 😘 | 440 | 6.35% | |
| 🤩 | 21 | 0.303% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.058% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.029% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.014% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.014% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 673 of the 673 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,051 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 673 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔍TG最强资源库 类似于百度 想要什么都能在这里找到 比如:公益科技辅助 各种各样的涩片 🥰 🥰 🥰 🥰 点击下方进入📱 👑 https://t.me/qcfx66 💬 https://t.me/qclflove
👍6❤1😍1
Signed TGBot
🧧🎉红包发送成功🎉🧧 🔥必安集团发送了一个红包! 💵总金额: 4888 U💸 🌈剩余: 143/288 🥇 34.13 USDT - 睡着了 🥈 31.96 USDT - 牛奶花生 🥉 31.49 USDT - 陈默
👍7❤1😍1
😃😀😃 🤬公益直装😂🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠😂 RAX MOD国外顶级开发者开发,真正做到安全稳定,出现问题第一时间更新⭐ 支持游戏⬇️ 1️⃣.三角洲🎮 (适配 国服 国际服 台湾服) 2️⃣.无畏契约🫥 3️⃣.和平精英🎮 4️⃣ 失控进化 功能介绍:⬇️ 1️⃣独家一体过签名一体安装包🐮 2️⃣高清绘制真正做到丝滑游戏 3️⃣独家自瞄,安全稳定高效运作真正做到枪枪到肉 🌟 抓紧点击下方体验 😂加入频道 😂 😂加入频道😂 🔥频道 https://t.me/+IpbHYQRoIIs5ZWJk 全网收管理位 联系 @raxguang
👍4🥰1😍1😘1
Signed 全网收管理 @raxguang
😃😀😃😀😃😀 国庆假期临近许多兄弟们缺钱阿呆集团联合固话拔通场地推出新型项目 项目内容从兄弟们自身出发主打无风险零投入回报高操作方便打款速度 主打安全第一❗️赚钱第二的原则❗️两年老频道➕500万流水为做单人员保驾护航 🥇项目单价🥇1988+388+88=2464 一个小时 ➡️➡️➡️项目入口:[老频道老项目长期合作项目己开两年流水近500万认准阿呆集团放心安心] ⚠️https://t.me/adggnb888 ⚠️https://t.me/adggnb888 ⚠️https://t.me/adggnb888 😃😃😃😃 : @adggnbkefu 动态万人认可金牌客服只拿实力说话
👍5😍1😘1
Signed 阿呆 (全网收管理) @adggku
🔍TG最强资源库 类似于百度 想要什么都能在这里找到 比如:公益科技辅助 各种各样的涩片 🥰 🥰 🥰 🥰 点击下方进入📱 👑 https://t.me/qcfx66 💬 https://t.me/qclflove
👍4❤1🥰1😘1
Signed TGBot
💸 曜石黑盒正式发布 · 全网独家 💸 ——现在下载软件,软件里有免费拼多多退款教程,打字赚钱教程.... 🔍 核心功能 ⬇️ 手机号定位 ⬇️ 身份证正反 ⬇️ 支付宝码反 ⬇️ 全家户籍 ❄️ 补齐身份证 ❄️ 精准猎魔 ❄️ 个人大头 ❄️ ai脱衣 🛡 手机反户籍 🛡 酒店摄像直播 🛡 微反三件套 🛡 照片人脸反 🖥 刑侦全户 🖥 抖音去水印 🖥 短信轰炸 🖥 电话轰炸 📱 无违规永久思路 🛰️ 无违规概率永久思路 🆕 新增几个功能:三角洲每日密码,顶级补齐,开房查询,口令反户,抖音反户...... 更快 · 更清晰 · 更稳定 点我进入频道获取卡密 点我进入频道获取卡密
👍7😍1😘1
👑北青和平最新人物范围 👑功能: ✅人物1.5范围 ✅支持全模式 ✅9.26最新值 🤴此文件仅支持安卓 ➡️➡️北青主频道 https://t.me/QXHNJ 😃😃北青副频道 https://t.me/BQnb69 😃😃期九期主频道 https://t.me/MQnb91 😃😃期九期副频道 https://t.me/yqobb 😃😃泛滥各大文件 https://t.me/sngf666888 低价刷赞刷/qq会员/卡网
👍8❤1😘1
庆祝频道人数37K 给大家发一个红包
👍7❤2
💕 恭喜您获得红包资格💕 ⚜️已发放 ¥81,652 ❗️今日剩余 168 份 🛜最新领取 用户***杰 领取188.66 RMB 用户***婷 领取58.80 RMB 用户***豪 领取666.66 RMB ⏰红包30分钟后失效💤
👍7🥰1😍1😘1
😃😀😃 🤬公益直装😂🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠😂 RAX MOD国外顶级开发者开发,真正做到安全稳定,出现问题第一时间更新⭐ 支持游戏⬇️ 1️⃣.三角洲🎮 (适配 国服 国际服 台湾服) 2️⃣.无畏契约🫥 3️⃣.和平精英🎮 4️⃣ 失控进化 功能介绍:⬇️ 1️⃣独家一体过签名一体安装包🐮 2️⃣高清绘制真正做到丝滑游戏 3️⃣独家自瞄,安全稳定高效运作真正做到枪枪到肉 🌟 抓紧点击下方体验 😂加入频道 😂 😂加入频道😂 🔥频道 https://t.me/+IpbHYQRoIIs5ZWJk 全网收管理位 联系 @raxguang
👍11🥰1😘1
Signed 全网收管理 @raxguang
和平9.29最新全枪强锁 功能: 单强锁自瞄 注意:此文件仅支持安卓 #和平精英
👍8🥰1😍1
和平9.29最新人物内透 功能; 人物内透 掩体分辨 HDR=发光内透 支持全模式 注意:此文件仅支持安卓 #和平精英
👍9🥰3❤1😍1😘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 673 posts we hold for @qcrja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@qcrja edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qcrja named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小月公益直装内核和平&PUBG&三角洲” (@qcrja), 37,783 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qcrja.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.