Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Астрофизика с Тим

Channel

Астрофизика с Тим

@kosmos_int

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

57,702subscribers

-578 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001464634426
TypeChannel
Username@kosmos_int
DescriptionМир, полный демонов: Наука — как свеча во тьме. Сотрудничество @astrotims
Created4 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kosmos_int

Growth

57,70258,28057,9916 August 2026 — 58,280 subscribers7 August 2026 — 58,263 subscribers7 August 2026 — 58,215 subscribers9 August 2026 — 58,163 subscribers9 August 2026 — 58,102 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58,035 subscribers11 August 2026 — 57,990 subscribers12 August 2026 — 57,941 subscribers14 August 2026 — 57,706 subscribers15 August 2026 — 57,738 subscribers16 August 2026 — 57,702 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -578. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,615–58,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 22:0657,702-36
15 Aug 2026, 14:2857,738+32
14 Aug 2026, 00:3757,706-235
12 Aug 2026, 16:5757,941-49
11 Aug 2026, 18:5457,990-45
10 Aug 2026, 20:5158,035-67
9 Aug 2026, 23:3458,102-61
9 Aug 2026, 00:5158,163-52
7 Aug 2026, 23:2858,215-48
7 Aug 2026, 00:0558,263-17
6 Aug 2026, 09:4658,280first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 6 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
847
Videos
238
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 36s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,804 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,34235.3%
🔥63016.6%
👍40010.5%
😁3589.41%
😱2446.41%
😍2255.91%
🤯1764.63%
🥰1574.13%
1513.97%
👏1213.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,804reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 12 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kosmos_int. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 December 2025 to 20 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 06:58 UTC≈5,390 views272 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

«От продажи PayPal я получил 180 миллионов долларов. 100 миллионов я вложил в SpaceX, 70 миллионов — в Tesla и ещё 10 миллионов — в SolarCity. В итоге мне даже пришлось занимать деньги, чтобы платить за аренду жилья.» — Илон Маск (На фото — 2008 год, после третьей подряд неудачной попытки запуска ракеты Falcon 1)

77👍43😁2720😱20🔥19🥰19🤯17

7 Jun 2026, 08:58 UTC≈39,800 views325 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Симуляция падения в черную дыру от NASA

🔥13955😁3317👏17😍14😱14👍13

27 May 2026, 15:16 UTC≈8,980 views353 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Video

🌍 А что, если однажды небо действительно загорится?... Специально для вас сделали реалистичный сценарий падения астероида. Если зашло - дайте реакцию 👍 💫 И напишите, что показать следующим: космос, катастрофы или что-то ещё?

🔥11556👍33🤯33😁25😱23👏2018

15 May 2026, 09:50 UTC≈9,600 views262 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Video

"Танец" черных дыр от NASA

98👍2826🔥22😍20🥰16😁15👏14

8 May 2026, 14:03 UTC≈10,900 views350 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

😱 Трамп: - Мы покажем снимки НЛО. Снимки НЛО: Официальный сайт Пентагона

😁19134😱20😍19👍18🤯18👏14🔥13

9 Apr 2026, 17:36 UTC≈12,800 views444 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Метеор, пролетающий над горой Фудзияма

239🥰50😍43👍32😱1814🔥14😁14

21 Mar 2026, 06:25 UTC≈74,800 views325 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

Сверхмассивная чёрная дыра TON 618⁠⁠ — самая крупная из всех, когда-либо обнаруженных 😨

🔥137😱63👍3824🤯1413🥰12👏9

10 Feb 2026, 09:01 UTC≈109,000 views320 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

NASA в специальном ролике показало, насколько огромны известные чёрные дыры.

128👍45😱42🔥34🤯3111🥰8👏7

23 Jan 2026, 12:57 UTC≈18,700 views349 reactions6 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Еще 100 лет назад многие астрономы считали Млечный Путь единственной галактикой во Вселенной. Теперь мы видим скопления из сотен галактик… На этом снимке телескоп «Hubble» запечатлел скопление галактик Abell 3827.

182🔥65👍37🤯1712😍12🥰10😁6

9 Jan 2026, 08:45 UTC≈17,400 views300 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите на «лобовое столкновение» двух галактик: это очень редкое явление 🤩 Космический телескоп «Хаббл» сделал впечатляющий снимок двух сталкивающихся галактик: из-за сильного гравитационного взаимодействия они превратились в одно светящееся кольцо. Переплетённые галактики известны под общим названием Arp-Madore 417-391 и находятся на расстоянии около 670 млн световых лет от Земли в созвездии Эридана. Его можно

149👍60🔥33😱21😍12😁7👏65

21 Dec 2025, 08:35 UTC≈15,400 views138 reactions2 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚀 NASA позволяет оставить имя на пути к Луне. Ты вводишь своё имя и PIN-код — и цифровой чип с этими данными отправляется в космическую миссию. https://www3.nasa.gov/send-your-name-with-artemis/#user-information

80😁22🔥15👍8👏43😍3😱2

6 Dec 2025, 10:45 UTC≈17,700 views366 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

💫 Ловите топовые обои по тематике фильма "Интерстеллар".

220😍54👍45🔥24🤯10😁4👏32

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kosmos_int. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,007,603 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Emiliuv
@emiliuv · 92,968
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 16 August 2026
Конспекты | Биология и Химия
@konspekty_ege · 94,131
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Астрофизика с Тим” (@kosmos_int), 57,702 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kosmos_int.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.