Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Илм-фан | Science | Наука

@themantiq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,735subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001224496448
TypeChannel
Username@themantiq
Created26 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/themantiq

Growth

4,7204,7384,7296 August 2026 — 4,720 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,720 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,730 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,738 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,735 subscribers4,7356 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,717–4,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:054,735-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:414,738+8
7 Aug 2026, 08:224,730+10
7 Aug 2026, 00:004,720no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:534,720first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 4,735 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (28 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total28,655
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 21 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @themantiq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC989 viewsread 12 August 2026

Қисқа видеоларга қарамлик ўсмирларнинг ўқишдаги стрессга чидамлилигини пасайтириши мумкин TikTok, Instagram Reels ва YouTube Shorts каби қисқа видеолар ҳаётимизнинг оддий бир қисмига айланиб улгурди. Бир неча сониялик видеолар кетма-кет чиқаверади, ҳар бири эса мияга янги ва тезкор рағбат беради. Аммо янги тадқиқотга кўра, қисқа видеоларни назоратсиз ва мажбуран томоша қилиш одати ўсмирларнинг ўқиш билан боғлиқ одд

11 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC774 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мияда мураккаб вазифаларда мотивацияни ушлаб туришга ёрдам берадиган орексин нейронлари аниқланди. Нагоя университети нейробиологлари гипоталамусда жойлашган орексин нейронларининг мақсад сари ҳаракатни давом эттиришдаги ролини ўрганишган. Инсон миясида бундай нейронлар сони 20 мингдан ошмаслиги мумкин. Улар уйғоқлик ва иштаҳани бошқаришда ҳам муҳим роль ўйнайди. Тажрибаларда каламушларга озиқ-овқат олиш учун тобор

9 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,100 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Ўсмирнинг яхши ўқиши ва дўстлари билан яхши муносабатда бўлиши учун энг асосий омиллардан бири — яхши уйқу Кўпинча бола ёки ўсмирнинг ўқишдаги муваффақияти ҳақида гап кетганда, унинг қанча вақт телефон ишлатиши, қанчалик кўп спорт билан шуғулланиши ёки қандай овқатланишига эътибор қаратамиз. Аммо янги тадқиқот бу омиллар орасида биз етарлича қадрламайдиган яна бир нарса борлигини кўрсатди: уйқу. Калифорния универси

8 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мия салбий кутилмани ҳақиқий оғриққа айлантириши мумкин Одам бирор нарса оғритишини олдиндан кутса, бу кутилма унинг оғриқни қандай ҳис қилишига таъсир қилиши мумкин. Бу ҳодиса ноцебо эффекти деб аталади. Масалан, инсонга бирор муолажа оғриқли бўлиши айтилса, ҳатто тўқимага қўшимча зарар етказилмаган ҳолатда ҳам у оғриқни кучлироқ ҳис қилиши мумкин. Энг қизиғи, оғриқ фақат зарарланган тўқимадан келадиган сигнал эм

8 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC998 viewsread 12 August 2026

Биз шакарни нега шунчалик яхши кўрамиз? Ширин нарса кўрсак, кўпчилигимиз уни ейиш истагини ҳис қиламиз. Мева, асал, ширинликлар — миямиз улардаги энергияни жуда «қадрлайди». Лекин, нега инсон ширин таъмни шунчалик яхши кўради? Янги тадқиқотлар бу саволга жавоб излар экан, шакар инсон эволюциясида биз ўйлагандан ҳам муҳимроқ роль ўйнаган бўлиши мумкинлигини кўрсатмоқда. 2017 йилда олимлар 140 дан ортиқ примат турин

6 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,310 views0 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Ўрта ёшдаги 3 одат деменцияни қарийб 13 йилга кечиктириши мумкин Айниқса, 45 ёшдан кейин бу жуда муҳим. Олимлар 12 409 нафар инсон маълумотларини таҳлил қилди. Иштирокчиларнинг саломатлиги ўртача 25 йилдан ортиқ кузатилган. Тадқиқот натижаларига кўра, қон босими меъёрда бўлган, қандли диабети бўлмаган ва чекмайдиган одамларда деменциянинг ривожланиши ушбу учта хавф омилига эга инсонларга нисбатан тахминан 13 йилга

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ўзбекистон ортиқча вазн бўйича МДҲ давлатлари орасида биринчи ўринда Мамлакатда катта ёшли аҳолининг қарийб 64 фоизи ортиқча вазнга эга деб баҳоланган. Our World in Data платформасининг Жаҳон соғлиқни сақлаш ташкилоти маълумотлари асосида тузилган рейтингига кўра, агар фақат аҳолиси 1 миллиондан ортиқ давлатлар ҳисобга олинса, Ўзбекистон ортиқча вазн тарқалиши бўйича дунёда 48-ўринни эгаллайди. Семизлик муаммоси Ў

5 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Фермада ўсган болаларда астма ва аллергия нега камроқ учрайди? Қишлоқда, айниқса чорвачилик фермаларида ўсган болаларда астма, аллергия ва айрим бошқа иммун тизими касалликлари шаҳарда ўсган болаларга нисбатан анча кам учрайди. Бу ҳодиса илмий адабиётларда «ферма эффекти» деб аталади. Энди эса олимлар бу ҳодисанинг эҳтимолий сабабини аниқлашга яна бир қадам яқинлашишди. Янги тадқиқотда чорвахоналар ҳавосида учрайди

5 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,380 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Тестостероннинг жуда паст ҳам, жуда юқори бўлиши ҳам депрессия хавфини ошириши мумкин Кўпчилик тестостерон қанча кўп бўлса, шунча яхши деб ўйлайди. Аммо янги тадқиқот натижалари бу тасаввур тўғри эмаслигини кўрсатмоқда. Олимлар 11 йил давомида иштирокчиларни кузатиб, қизиқ натижага келишди: ўз ёши учун тестостерон даражаси меъёрдан анча паст ёки анча юқори бўлган эркакларда депрессия ва хавотир ривожланиш хавфи юқо

3 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈1,760 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ўйлаш ҳақиқатдан ҳам жуда кўп энергия сарфлайдими? Кун давомида оғир ақлий меҳнат қилганимиздан сўнг ўзимизни жуда чарчагандек ҳис қиламиз. Шунинг учун кўпчилик «кўп ўйлаш миянинг катта қисми энергиясини сарфлайди» деб ҳисоблайди. Аммо янги таҳлиллар бу тасаввур тўлиқ тўғри эмаслигини кўрсатди. Инсон мияси тана вазнининг атиги 2% ини ташкил қилса ҳам, у организм ишлаб чиқарадиган энергиянинг тахминан 20%ини истеъм

3 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 12 August 2026

Онг фақат мияда эмасми? Янги тадқиқот марказга митохондрияларни қўймоқда Мактабда ҳаммамиз митохондрияни «ҳужайранинг энергия станцияси» деб ўрганганмиз. Аммо Колумбия университети биологи Мартин Пикар бу органеллаларнинг вазифаси бундан анча кенгроқ бўлиши мумкинлигини таъкидламоқда. Унинг фикрича, митохондриялар нафақат энергия ишлаб чиқаради, балки мия, тана ва ҳатто онг ўртасидаги боғлиқликда ҳам муҳим ўрин тута

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @themantiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 229,837 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Илм-фан | Science | Наука” (@themantiq), 4,735 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themantiq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.