KIDODU-MAILS. 🍰 pinned a video

Channel
KIDODU-MAILS. 🍰
@kidodu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,937subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001704474028 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kidodu |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kidodu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 16,937 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 16,933 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 16,935 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 16,929 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 16,922 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.64%
- avg views ÷ 16,937 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 278
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (23 May 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,054 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 50s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
389 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 153 | 39.3% | |
| ⚡ | 81 | 20.8% | |
| 👀 | 58 | 14.9% | |
| 🍓 | 51 | 13.1% | |
| 🆒 | 46 | 11.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 389reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 47 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kidodu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ (Lembaran Bercerita: 2014’s.|Dibutuhkan.) kursi rotan tua menjadi saksi sebagaimana kerasnya ia men-tulis tangan dengan pena hitam tua yang berjasa. @chimescale di balik setiap keberhasilan, selalu ada jalan terjal yang menuntut untuk dilalui. namun dengan adanya @chimescale, setiap kesulitan perlahan menemukan jalan keluarnya. & hanya dengan harga Rp12.000, kamu telah membuka pintu men…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ╭◜◝ ◜ ╮ ╭◜◝ ◜◝ ◝╮ ( dotty ) ( kittie ) ╰◟◞ ╭◜◝ ◜◝ ◝ ╮◞◟◞ ╯ ( ♡ lolita... ) ╰◟◞ ◟◞ ◟◞ ╯ PROMO CLASS AGUSTUS moodboard class . ゚ ༝ 15.000 🎀. = 10.000 design class . ゚ ༝ 20.000 💭 . = 15.000 bundle clas…
guyss, ini orang kenapa rewel banget yaa??? ada yang kenaal diaa nggaa???. jujuur, dari kemarin di chat in teruss beneran risih dahh, bete banget t_t. namanya itu kalau ga salah nayi nayi gitulaa. dia awalnya ngechat aku, nanyaa doang sih. tapi dia awalnya ceritaa kalau dia pusing banget join class sana sini tapi ngga ada yang masuk ke otaak, terus diaa nanya katanya ”kamu tau nggaa class yang oke”. nah akumah jelas…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ (Lembaran Bercerita: 2014’s.|Dibutuhkan.) kursi rotan tua menjadi saksi sebagaimana kerasnya ia men-tulis tangan dengan pena hitam tua yang berjasa. @chimescale di balik setiap keberhasilan, selalu ada jalan terjal yang menuntut untuk dilalui. namun dengan adanya @chimescale, setiap kesulitan perlahan menemukan jalan keluarnya. & hanya dengan harga Rp12.000, kamu telah membuka pintu men…
akuu lagi lemes bangeet guys, dan lagi sibuuk jugaa. btw aku lagi sibuuk mantengin class nya @chimescale, karenaa materi hampir tiap up, benefit bertambah tapi harganya teteeep 10.000 😭😭😭. gaaa booong, kok adaa yaa class se ikhlass ini??? udahan materinya gampang bangeet di pahamin laagi, dan materinya pun nggaak pelit. pleaseee admin class semoga masuk surgaaaaa t__t ❣️❣️❣️❣️. ayooo guys, joooin @chimescale!
HELO BB. kaalian maau tutor manips ndaakk? akuu mau ngasih kalian tutorial manipss nih heheee. tetaaaapi, kalian kayanyaa better join class di @chimescale deeh kalau kepingin! kenapaa? karena materinyaa lebih lengkaaap tauu, dan disitu ngajaarinnya bener bener gampang di mengerti bangeet! paraaah! selain itu di @chimescale jugaa results nyaa cakep cakeep ih, suka bangeeet hasilnyaaa. pembelajaran nya bener beneeer di…
HELO BB. kaalian maau tutor manips ndaakk? akuu mau ngasih kalian tutorial manipss nih heheee. tetaaaapi, kalian kayanyaa better join class di @chimescale deeh kalau kepingin! kenapaa? karena materinyaa lebih lengkaaap tauu, dan disitu ngajaarinnya bener bener gampang di mengerti bangeet! paraaah! selain itu di @chimescale jugaa results nyaa cakep cakeep ih, suka bangeeet hasilnyaaa. pembelajaran nya bener beneeer di…
guys aku dapet info dari group editing gituu, katanya banyak yaa sekarang yaang open class tapi abal abal gituu??? ih ngeri banget ya, pasti gaa worth it banget:(((. taapi tapi jangan sedih guyss, sini aku kasih tau kalau sekarang tuu adaaa class murce & nggaa zonkk yaitu @chimescale! beneran guyss, isinyaa nggak abal abal dan lengkap bangeet sama materi
guyss, ini orang kenapa rewel banget yaa??? ada yang kenaal diaa nggaa???. jujuur, dari kemarin di chat in teruss beneran risih dahh, bete banget t_t. namanya itu kalau ga salah nayi nayi gitulaa. dia awalnya ngechat aku, nanyaa doang sih. tapi dia awalnya ceritaa kalau dia pusing banget join class sana sini tapi ngga ada yang masuk ke otaak, terus diaa nanya katanya ”kamu tau nggaa class yang oke”. nah akumah jelas…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ (Lembaran Bercerita: 2014’s.|Dibutuhkan.) kursi rotan tua menjadi saksi sebagaimana kerasnya ia men-tulis tangan dengan pena hitam tua yang berjasa. @chimescale di balik setiap keberhasilan, selalu ada jalan terjal yang menuntut untuk dilalui. namun dengan adanya @chimescale, setiap kesulitan perlahan menemukan jalan keluarnya. & hanya dengan harga Rp12.000, kamu telah membuka pintu men…
Halo guys, gua lagi hiring orang buat yang mau join class dengan harga 12.000 ini 🤯😵💫 langsung aja kepoin channelnya di 🤯😘 @HOWTODOTHATT yuk keburu harganya semakin naik 😜🩵✌🏻. Thank you guys!
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @kidodu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 820,155 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@lunabeesite · 7,2043 postsleurreicy's archive.
@leurrearsip · 92 postsarchiveour 𐙚
@arcbonheur · 181 post🪷. Chamill Store Archive
@archivecham · 151 postBLUE FLEURS Archive
@BlueFleurs · 71 postarchive!
@chetayies · 441 postarchive! @ geyllato’s
@flavoqr · 71 postBackrest.
@inikerjaansiapa · 3351 post🪼. 𝐈𝐕𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐀 𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐒
@IvankaArchives · 261 postlouriette – s archive ୨୧
@louriettes · 161 post@STAREVOIR 'S ARCHIVE.
@PieceH · 101 postarchive @mythleey
@rbreakup · 61 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KIDODU-MAILS. 🍰” (@kidodu), 16,937 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kidodu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.