#ping menurut kalian video hfw tanpa deco tuh start berapa ya jualnya?

Channel
PROFILFESS: open! 🏇🏻
@Profilfess
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,113subscribers
+2,579 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003033574736 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Profilfess |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Profilfess |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 17,113 | -79 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 17,192 | -17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 17,209 | -16 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 17,225 | -17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 17,242 | -46 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 17,288 | +45 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 17,243 | +12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 17,231 | -37 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:34 | 17,268 | +44 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:14 | 17,224 | +61 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 17,163 | +77 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 17,086 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 17,100 | +56 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 17,044 | +138 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 16,906 | +454 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 16,452 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 16,453 | +86 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 16,367 | +99 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 16,268 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 16,262 | first reading |
Engagement
932 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.661%
- avg views ÷ 17,113 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 113
- 176 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.81%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 176
- of 932 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 176 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 932 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 19,914 |
| Reactions total | 187 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 42s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
973 reactions across 191 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🆒 | 361 | 37.1% | |
| 🤩 | 269 | 27.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 244 | 25.1% | |
| 👀 | 73 | 7.50% | |
| 🎉 | 26 | 2.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 932 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 973 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 932 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#ping wdyt pon? Aneh nggaa...
🤩1
#ping poniess, better apel hijau atau apel merah buat storypuzzle¿?
❤🔥1
#ping list material yang sering up dimana ponies?
#pour ponies, ada yg sama egk s, kalo keasikan belajar di satu div, pasti kalo bikin yang lain malah jadi kureng, inilah yang sedang sender rasakan, keasikan belajar bikin moodboard sampe pas mau ngedit manips hasilnya malah kureng 🙃🙃, sampe waktu itu sender pernah tolak cust karna ngerasa editannya jadi kureng 🥲
❤🔥1
#ping . Kira kira ini ditambahin apa lagi ya?? aga ngerasa kosong gitu, anw ini belum selesai ya jadi aga berantakan hehe :> (free kritsar>__)
#ping hi ndeul, moo saran dung, kayaa kuraang shadow nya ya? jujur bingung peletakan shadownya gimanaa.. saranin dungg oiyaa ada tambahan.. dua fotonya bener dari fansite yah, daan akuu suda dapet izin oleh dua duanya di X , ini buat pu yah untuk ig akuu, dan buatt credit ttep aku pakaii, dan kayanya nanti creditnya aaku perjelas lagii❤️❤️ mau minta arahan mending tambahin shadow nya apaa nggaa gituu, timacii yaa💘
❤🔥6🤩3
#ping nahh gini harusnya, sudah pas blum yaa? kebanyakan putihnya gaa pinknya bikin sakit mata gaa..
#pals hello, aku butuh admin class pf, class nya udah jalan kok. butuh beberapa admin lagi hehe, kerja nya fleksibel kok yang penting up tutorial minimal 2 per minggu nya. untuk gaji nya per upload yaa. sediain result yaa
#ping wdyt? paboleh minta kritsar nyaaa. thankiessss
#ping hi wdyt yh... after sebulanan gk ngedit menips, kritik dan saran dung..
🤩9
#ping ukuran story board tuh berapa yaa? apa bener 9:16 ? soalnya kaya keliatan panjang banget😔
Showing the 12 most recent of 932 posts we hold for @Profilfess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@wafflepop · 5,5612 postsHɆӾSPURG.
@Hexspurg · 2,3711 post🚹 #REALOUSH.SITE!
@Realoush · 4,3991 post。* 🎀 cawsite ’s. ⌨️
@cawsite · 2,8511 postKIDODU. (open pp guyc)
@kidodu · 17,2271 post🐩 ‘liloupie’ : .. 🎀
@liloupie · 3,5271 post✚ ƧETTLĘ
@secttle · 4,8801 post(chart.theskiest)
@theskiest · 15,8241 postㅤ ᪲ ֺ ° ۪ Summiko♡ ᪲ ۪۪ ֹ 𝅄
@wxaln · 1,7651 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@theskiest · 15,82410 postsKIDODU. (open pp guyc)
@kidodu · 17,2278 posts𝒟.𝒞. (minimal subs kalau pake material sini)
@demacuit · 8,3644 postsWaterparkv. (CEK PINNED.)
@waterparkv · 8,7474 postswaffle-pop ♡
@wafflepop · 5,5613 postsPF: RECORD. 📦
@Profilfesss · 172 posts。* 🎀 cawsite ’s. ⌨️
@cawsite · 2,8511 postDotFess: Daily
@DotFess · 31,4061 postHɆӾSPURG.
@Hexspurg · 2,3711 post🐩 ‘liloupie’ : .. 🎀
@liloupie · 3,5271 post🚹 #REALOUSH.SITE!
@Realoush · 4,3991 post✚ ƧETTLĘ
@secttle · 4,8801 postTrackest
@trackest · 4821 postㅤ ᪲ ֺ ° ۪ Summiko♡ ᪲ ۪۪ ֹ 𝅄
@wxaln · 1,7651 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PROFILFESS: open! 🏇🏻” (@Profilfess), 17,113 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Profilfess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.