Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

c

@crackpotsite

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,324subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002377391045
TypeChannel
Username@crackpotsite
Description✱ It is forbidden to reupload, inspo, repost without processing and also without permission. leave=banned forever ask/anything text me @callsean_bot pp : @ppcracks moots : @crackmootsrobot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crackpotsite

Growth

10,31910,32810,323.56 August 2026 — 10,328 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,326 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,320 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,321 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,319 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,325 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,324 subscribers10,3246 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,318–10,329 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:3410,324-1
12 Aug 2026, 01:3410,325+6
10 Aug 2026, 23:3310,319-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:3410,321+1
8 Aug 2026, 20:5610,320-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:3210,326-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:4610,328first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 7 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.39%
avg views ÷ 10,324 subscribers
Avg views / post
660
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.489%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held27 (7 March 202610 August 2026)
Views total7,255
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Videos
2
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

461 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15032.5%
🔥12226.5%
🆒6213.4%
💘326.94%
❤‍🔥214.56%
🤯153.25%
🏆81.74%
👾81.74%
💯81.74%
71.52%
👀71.52%
🎉61.30%
👏61.30%
🥰61.30%
💋30.651%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crackpotsite. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC203 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Kak? Rpc dooong😞 di store kamu aktif banget update catalogue nya, tapi gak bisa bales chatku... tolong kabarin ya kak, i need you so much buat jajan di store @fearlyrose

🔥2🤯2

10 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC255 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

⚠️ Grup Dialihkan ke Anda: @FEARLYROSE Pemilik grup @fearlyrose sebelumnya telah mengalihkan kepemilikan grup mereka kepada Anda. Anda menjadi pemilik grup baru dan bertanggung jawab atas isinya.

2🥰2

10 Aug 2026, 01:43 UTC250 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝘱𝘯𝘨.𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘴 | ♥️..💬 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶! 𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘬 𝘥𝘢𝘯 𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘪𝘢𝘱 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘨𝘶 𝘬𝘢𝘮𝘶, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨. https://t.me/Fearlyrose acaline to cloy the hiclousia : (as an coquetté–acres.)

2❤‍🔥1🏆1

9 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC321 viewsread 13 August 2026

Hello kak?? It’s been like 2 days, I’m still waiting btw😔 Kalau emang gabisa handle, please tell meee biar aku cari seller lain kayak @folkynd yang jualan mb se cakep itu..

9 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC438 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

hi kak, aku mau laporan. Maaf sebelumnya pake akun kosongan, tapi cuma mau ngasih info ini aja dari temenku. Katanya kalau mau jajan mending ke @folkynd kak, soalnya murah murah

2

9 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC483 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

(Discord, Urban.) Beside تشققات Avenue © Blastof-From-Coarse: Mediocre Idea Enrichment Section, @ظهر District ➕🇺🇸 Center-Traffic: Burghal-Manhattan: Stretching Crowded, CREATIVITY (✰) ★ Moodboard ★Storyboard 02.AM ★ StoryPuzzle ★ HFW Hi, Let's Check, Item-Incredible: ( https://t.me/FOLKYND/476 ) 🔝

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @crackpotsite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 416,797 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“c” (@crackpotsite), 10,324 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crackpotsite.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.