Kak? Rpc dooong😞 di store kamu aktif banget update catalogue nya, tapi gak bisa bales chatku... tolong kabarin ya kak, i need you so much buat jajan di store @fearlyrose
🔥2🤯2
Channel
@crackpotsite
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,324subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002377391045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crackpotsite |
| Description | ✱ It is forbidden to reupload, inspo, repost without processing and also without permission. leave=banned forever ask/anything text me @callsean_bot pp : @ppcracks moots : @crackmootsrobot |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crackpotsite |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 10,324 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 10,325 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 10,319 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 10,321 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 10,320 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 10,326 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 10,328 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (7 March 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,255 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
461 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 150 | 32.5% | |
| 🔥 | 122 | 26.5% | |
| 🆒 | 62 | 13.4% | |
| 💘 | 32 | 6.94% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 4.56% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 3.25% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 1.74% | |
| 👾 | 8 | 1.74% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 1.74% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 1.52% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 1.52% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.651% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crackpotsite. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Kak? Rpc dooong😞 di store kamu aktif banget update catalogue nya, tapi gak bisa bales chatku... tolong kabarin ya kak, i need you so much buat jajan di store @fearlyrose
🔥2🤯2
⚠️ Grup Dialihkan ke Anda: @FEARLYROSE Pemilik grup @fearlyrose sebelumnya telah mengalihkan kepemilikan grup mereka kepada Anda. Anda menjadi pemilik grup baru dan bertanggung jawab atas isinya.
❤2🥰2
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝘱𝘯𝘨.𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘴 | ♥️..💬 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶! 𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘬 𝘥𝘢𝘯 𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘪𝘢𝘱 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘨𝘶 𝘬𝘢𝘮𝘶, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨. https://t.me/Fearlyrose acaline to cloy the hiclousia : (as an coquetté–acres.)
❤2❤🔥1🏆1
Hello kak?? It’s been like 2 days, I’m still waiting btw😔 Kalau emang gabisa handle, please tell meee biar aku cari seller lain kayak @folkynd yang jualan mb se cakep itu..
hi kak, aku mau laporan. Maaf sebelumnya pake akun kosongan, tapi cuma mau ngasih info ini aja dari temenku. Katanya kalau mau jajan mending ke @folkynd kak, soalnya murah murah
❤2
c pinned a video
(Discord, Urban.) Beside تشققات Avenue © Blastof-From-Coarse: Mediocre Idea Enrichment Section, @ظهر District ➕🇺🇸 Center-Traffic: Burghal-Manhattan: Stretching Crowded, CREATIVITY (✰) ★ Moodboard ★Storyboard 02.AM ★ StoryPuzzle ★ HFW Hi, Let's Check, Item-Incredible: ( https://t.me/FOLKYND/476 ) 🔝
❤1
boookinnnggg
pp booking yuu masih banyak yang kosoong
jangan lupa pp @ppcracks yah
c pinned Deleted message
c pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @crackpotsite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 416,797 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“c” (@crackpotsite), 10,324 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crackpotsite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.