Channel
@Troveert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15,533subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002310889664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Troveert |
| Description | Amidst new yorke’s clamorous streets, where iron spires claw at heaven and walls echo rebellion. lies @TroveertBot & @TroveertPp & @TroveertMutual_Bot 🝊 “emporium—a haven where the city’s spirit meets raw elegance and untamed art.” |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Troveert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 15,533 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 15,543 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 15,546 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 15,549 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 15,553 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 15,551 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 15,551 | first reading |
54 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (19 April 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,262 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
342 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 110 | 32.2% | |
| 🔥 | 91 | 26.6% | |
| 🆒 | 67 | 19.6% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 9.06% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.92% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.75% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 1.46% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 1.17% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 1.17% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 1.17% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.877% | |
| 🎅 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.292% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Troveert. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Channel ini bakal closedown dalam waktu dekat. Yang masih mau save materialnya bisa langsung chat gue @liloupie. daripada galau ketipu, mendingan hepi abis nemu class baru MAAF YAAA BAAAANGGGGG! GAAKAN CLOSEDOWN SOALNYA GUE ABIS NEMU SATU CLASS YANG GACORRRR ABISSSSSSS! LIAT @liloupie YANG CUMA NGASIH HARGA RP. 10.000 — 15.000 TAPI UDAH DAPETIN BENEFIT SEBANYAK INII??
yaudah lah, kabur guys. Maklumin aja gaada tanggung jawab 🤣🤣 paling nanti berulah lagi ini bocah, ytta aja. Pokoknya kalau si @liloupie berulah lagi kabarin, biar langsung kita fw semua materi claasnya yg gacor adorable itu
Sampe sekarang gaada kabar, gaada kepastian. Gua chat juga kagak ade di botnya atau adminnya yang nyaut. Ga niat bangun class? YA MASA SIHHH class @liloupie KAYAK GINI? MATERI NYA AJA SELALU CAKEP, GACOR, TAKJUB! GAUSAH DIRAGUIN LAGI KALAU SAMA @Liloupie. GAS JOIN SEKARANG!
aku ditipu owner class, kan aku join class permanen, masa yang permanen malah cintaku pada @liloupe cihuy ahay
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ╭◜◝ ◜ ╮ ╭◜◝ ◜◝ ◝╮ ( dotty ) ( kittie ) ╰◟◞ ╭◜◝ ◜◝ ◝ ╮◞◟◞ ╯ ( ♡ lolita... ) ╰◟◞ ◟◞ ◟◞ ╯ PROMO CLASS AGUSTUS moodboard class . ﾟ ༝ 15.000 🎀. = 10.000 design class . ﾟ ༝ 20.000 💭 . = 15.000 bundle clas…
Ada yang mau gua kasih saldan? Tapi syaratnya YANG YSSA YSSA AJA BOSS 🙈🙈 yang @sweetpeia @sweetpeia aja 😝😝 mending saldan lo yang sisa gocek itu habisin buat join class @sweetpeia yang dapet banyak benefit gacor dan bantu kalian kasih banyak akses serta fasilitas buat ngedit 😍
Gaada kimpul, kita ganti join @sweetpeia yang cuma 10k doang tapi bisa bantu lo buat improve bahkan nemenin lo dari 0 bukan kayak doi yang ngilang lhoya 😝😝 buruan deh @sweetpeia nungguin kalian buat join dan jadi editor berkelas gacor slebew
❤1
Ga habis pikir anj 😭😭 bayangin dah lupada cuma keluar 1% dari hasil jualan lu dan angka 1% masih kebanyakan buat diitung modal join @sweetpeia 😭 harus nyobain sih, worth it banget dapet benefit sebanyak itu cuma 10k doangg
Jujur dari segala banyaknya opini kalian, kalian semua kalah sama gua yang beropini kalo @sweetpeia emang worth it banget, cuma keluar 10k lu pada udah diajarin segala macam dan masih ada benefit lain. Siapa setuju sama gua??? 😏
KAAANN APA KATA GUAAA??? EMANG KALIAN MUBAZIR KALO SKIP @SWEETPEIA YANG HARGA JOINNYA CUMA 10K UDAH DIAJARIN DARI A SAMPE Z CARA NGEDIT YANG BAIK DAN BENERRR, THEME TERBARU YANG TRENDY DAN MASIH BANYAAK BENEFIT LAINNYA YANG BISA LU DAPET
Tapi lho, bener kata sebelah kalo @sweetpeia emang se bermasalah itu. Coba lu bayangin dah, lu cuma keluar 10k doang udah dikasih banyak benefit yang worth it banget buat kalian belajar ngedit, apa nggak kemurahan??? Emag dasar lo @sweetpeia 😡😡
Two-Step Verification settings changed. Dear xxxx, your Two-Step Verification password and/or email were changed on 01/07/2026 at 17:13:52 UTC. Daripada panik mending langsung cus check @sweetpeia yang katanya nyediain class gado-gado alias class pf super lengkap! Harga nya juga ga kalah murah sama paketan ayam geprek plus es teh loh ya ✌🏻
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @Troveert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 644,339 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Troveert named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TROVEERT” (@Troveert), 15,533 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Troveert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.