ㅤ
II ./ MIND CIRCLES
Hope flickers then slips away leaving fatigue and doubt to guide steps. Time stretches meaning thins even passion feels misplaced. 🕷️🩸
@ODDSEATBOT FOR ANY SHOUTS, COMPLAINTS, QUESTIONS AND OTHR SHOUTS. @NotesAtNight (PP)
ㅤ
Created
Between 1 December 2025 and 13 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,745–9,838 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:56
9,827
+15
9 Aug 2026, 17:01
9,812
+50
7 Aug 2026, 03:05
9,762
+6
6 Aug 2026, 22:46
9,756
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.63%
avg views ÷ 9,827 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.378%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
52 (13 May 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
9,061
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
35
Videos
1
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 30s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
348 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
173
49.7%
🔥
47
13.5%
🤩
31
8.91%
💋
27
7.76%
💯
24
6.90%
🆒
14
4.02%
👀
12
3.45%
👌
11
3.16%
🫡
9
2.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 348reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yu
sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸
💸 link.dana.id/kaget?c=skh65x
Bingung cari class mb & st yang worth it dimana? Mending langsung check @sweetpeia aja! Benefits nya udah pasti worth it 100%. Dan pastinya dibimbing sampai paham. Free konsultasi editan secara private!
Two-Step Verification settings changed. Dear xxxx, your Two-Step Verification password and/or email were changed on 01/07/2026 at 17:13:52 UTC.
Daripada panik mending langsung cus check @sweetpeia yang katanya nyediain class gado-gado alias class pf super lengkap! Harga nya juga ga kalah murah sama paketan ayam geprek plus es teh loh ya ✌🏻
huhu kak sorry pesanan aku belum beres yaa? 🥲😓 ini udah lewat deadline loh.. kalau sampai jam 18:00 belum kaka send result nya bakal aku laporin ya ke @bantaipenipu atas kasus class worth it yang resultnya imut dan ganteng 😜 so tunggu apalagi mending join sekarang!! atau pantengin channel nya karena suka promo dadakan 🤫✌🏻
Channel ini bakal closedown dalam waktu dekat. Yang masih mau save materialnya bisa langsung chat gue @liloupie.
daripada galau ketipu, mendingan hepi abis nemu class baru
MAAF YAAA BAAAANGGGGG! GAAKAN CLOSEDOWN SOALNYA GUE ABIS NEMU SATU CLASS YANG GACORRRR ABISSSSSSS! LIAT @liloupie YANG CUMA NGASIH HARGA RP. 10.000 — 15.000 TAPI UDAH DAPETIN BENEFIT SEBANYAK INII??
Sampe sekarang gaada kabar, gaada kepastian. Gua chat juga kagak ade di botnya atau adminnya yang nyaut. Ga niat bangun class?
YA MASA SIHHH class @liloupie KAYAK GINI? MATERI NYA AJA SELALU CAKEP, GACOR, TAKJUB! GAUSAH DIRAGUIN LAGI KALAU SAMA @Liloupie. GAS JOIN SEKARANG!
yaudah lah, kabur guys. Maklumin aja gaada tanggung jawab 🤣🤣 paling nanti berulah lagi ini bocah, ytta aja. Pokoknya kalau si @liloupie berulah lagi kabarin, biar langsung kita fw semua materi claasnya yg gacor adorable itu
⚠️ Channel Dialihkan ke Anda: Howtodothatt
Pemilik channel @Howtodothatt sebelumnya telah mengalihkan kepemilikan channel mereka kepada Anda. Anda menjadi pemilik channel baru dan bertanggung jawab atas isinya.
Jika ini merupakan kesalahan atau Anda tidak ingin memiliki channel ini, Anda dapat menolak pengalihan dengan menekan 'https://t.me/HowToDoThatt/70'
KENAPA? KENA GOCEK YA CINTA? WADUH, DARI PADA KENA TFO C…
Kak orderan aku kapan selesainya ya? udah seminggu loh ini, sampai berlumut deh aku! Kalau gini sih, aku mendingan belajar profneeds aja ah di @Howtodothatt, modal 12.000 udah bisa belajar di 4 aplikasi berbeda! Fuyooo. Gas lah, ikut aku kak, sama-sama join classnya @Howtodothatt!
Halo kak selamat (..), usn kamu ufs ngga yya? kalau iya, boleh hint pricenya ngga ya biar aku siapin budget nih. Eh tapi kayaknya mending aku siapin budget buat ikut classnya @Howtodothatt ngga sih? masa class segini lengkapnya cuma 12.000? mana updatenya rutin setiap minggu! udah ah, aku mau join ke class ini aja. Materinya juga ngga itu-itu aja, bye kak!
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤ★ YOUR PROFILE NEEDS CLASS! ★
ㅤupgrade your skill editing and protofolio
ㅤㅤㅤㅤonly in @Howtodothatt! 🪲🩷.
(a). LEARN MORE THAN ONE APPS EDIT.
(b). BENEFIT CLASS FROM HOW TO DO THAT.
(c). WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT US?!
ㅤㅤPRICE ONLY 12.000, GRAB IT FAST!
ㅤㅤ𝟶𝟷. REGISTRATION FORM.
ㅤㅤ𝟶𝟸. CLASS REGULATION.
ㅤㅤ𝟶𝟹. CONTACT PERSON.
GRAB IT FAST DARLING! SEE YOU IN THE CLASS! WITH LOVE, H…
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @oddseat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 154,424 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@oddseat named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bantaipenipu named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“2AM: ”@oddseat” 🗄️🩸” (@oddseat), 9,827 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oddseat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.