Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

خودکشی

@khodcoshi1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001884533747
TypeChannel
Username@khodcoshi1
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 21 July 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/khodcoshi1

Growth

638 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:3163no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:4663first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
4
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 00s
Average length
2m 45s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1436.8%
👍1334.2%
💔513.2%
🔥25.26%
😢25.26%
👌12.63%
👏12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2023 to 4 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Dec 2025, 15:46 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

تجربه مرگ انجی فنیمور رازی که بعد از خودکشی فهمیدم … ❌ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFFLlbxItp0 @nazeraramesh4

👍1

1 Oct 2025, 07:01 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

تسلیم تام و کمال سوال: دیگر نمیخواهم زندگی کنم؟ خسته ام دیگر تحمل این وضع را ندارم ... #اکهارت_تله خوانش_حسین @nazeraramesh2

😢2

23 Jul 2025, 11:29 UTC227 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔶«مطالبی برگرفته از کتاب‌ها، مصاحبه‌ها و گزارش‌های علمی مانند آثار دکتر ساشا پلاکو و منابع معتبر NDE »🔶 1. جان (John) – آلمان • شرح ماجرا: جان در ۲۶ سالگی پس از یک افسردگی شدید، اقدام به خودکشی با دارو کرد. • تجربه NDE: او در حالت بیهوشی کامل، می‌گوید: “احساس کردم در نوری گرم و آرام غرق شدم… نه قضاوتی بود، نه تنبیهی… فقط عشق. صدایی شنیدم که گفت: هنوز وقتت نرسیده.” 🔹نتیجه: او پس از بازگشت، نه‌تنها افسردگی‌اش کاهش

3

14 Jun 2025, 04:19 UTC186 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

طبیعت هرگز اجازه نمی دهد دونفر شبیه هم باشند. خداوند آن چنان خلاق است که هرگز نسخه کپی کاربنی نمی سازد. پس هر انسانی باید زندگی خویش را زندگی کند. تو موجودی تصادفی نیستی. جهان هستی به تو نیاز دارد. بدون تو چیزی از جهان هستی کسر است. هیچکس دیگر نمیتواند جایت را پر کند. بدون تو جهان هستی دلش برایت تنگ میشود. اشو @iiosho

5

9 Apr 2025, 21:17 UTC223 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

تجربه مرگ تقریبی بن تجربه نزدیک به مرگ در اثر خودکشی ❌ ارواح گمشده و فراموش شده https://www.youtube.com/@Y-fringe/videos @nazeraramesh4

31 Mar 2025, 23:50 UTC252 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

تو ارزشمندی، قدر خودت رو بدون 🫂❤️ ⁣ ⁣ سخنران : داریل آنکا (بشار)

24 Mar 2025, 21:24 UTC235 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

: تجربه مرگ کریستین کلمینو ملاقات با خود برترم https://www.youtube.com/@Y-fringe/videos @nazeraramesh4

3 Feb 2025, 04:48 UTC321 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🟥🟥 گفتگوی دو دانشمند برجسته آلمانی در حیطه تجارب مرگ تقریبی در ارتباط با تحقیق وسیعی که در زمینه خودکشی و همزمان تجربه مرگ تقریبی در سال ۲۰۲۴ انجام گرفته است. #دکتر ولفگانگ کنول و پروفسور اولیور لازار 🟥 فقط همین مقداری که تقدیم شده در مورد خودکشی صحبت کردند. https://instagram.com/gelareh_sadatakhavi?igshid=1eg1om4rjrgjz

👏1🔥1

3 Feb 2025, 04:40 UTC325 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🟥🟥در گزارشات تجارب نزدیک به مرگ در کسانی که اقدام به خودکشی کرده اند، یک آمار بسیار بالایی از امتناع مجدد آن مشاهده می شود. آنها گمان می کنند که بعد از خودکشی شان همه چیز خاموش می شود و تمام می شود و آنها به آرامش می رسند. 🔲هر دو این تصورات کاملا اشتباه و بی اساس است. انسان بلافاصله در جهان دیگری متولد می شود. 🔲 با توجه به اینکه در مسیر تجارب مرگ جهانی به غیر از این جهان کاملا برایمان روشن شده است، کسانیکه از تجارب م

1🔥1

24 Aug 2024, 07:14 UTC386 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @nazerarameshPhoto

با خودکشی به هیچ جایی رهنمون نمی شوی، فقط هوشیاری ات را وارد زهدان کم سطح تری می کنی، زیرا نتوانسته ای در سطح بالاتر زندگی ات را اداره کنی. 💜اشو @oshowords

💔51👌1

9 Aug 2024, 09:07 UTC383 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

#سوال_از_اشو سوال از اشو (چه چیزی کمک می‌کند تا از خودکشی، که در چند نسل یک خانواده ای شایع شده جلوگیری شود؟) پاسخ اشو را بشنوید.....

2👍1

15 Apr 2024, 20:15 UTC468 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

🔲◾️هانس ویلهلم (Hans Wilhelm)یک عارف، نویسنده و تصویرگر بیش از 200 کتاب برای همه سنین است. از جمله برخی از آنها با بایرون کیتی‌مشترک نوشته شده اند. کتاب های او بیش از 40 میلیون نسخه فروخته و به 30 زبان ترجمه شده است. وی با دکتر الیزابت کوپلر راس از پیشگامان پژوهش مرگ، همکاری نزدیک داشته است. 🔲◾️ نظرات تحقیقات بیش از ۶۰ سال وی پیرامون مرگ و تناسخ.(قسمت اول) https://instagram.com/gelareh_sadatakhavi?igshid=1eg1om4rjrg

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khodcoshi1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,282,627 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خودکشی” (@khodcoshi1), 63 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khodcoshi1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.