6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,528–5,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 20:08
5,550
+14
11 Aug 2026, 21:23
5,536
+5
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
5,531
-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:40
5,533
+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:35
5,531
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:23
5,531
first reading
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.46%
avg views ÷ 5,550 subscribers
Avg views / post
358
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
51 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
18,274
Reactions total
631
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
631 reactions across 50 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
492
78.0%
👍
57
9.03%
🔥
36
5.71%
🙏
24
3.80%
🕊
16
2.54%
😍
3
0.475%
🎉
1
0.158%
👎
1
0.158%
🤣
1
0.158%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 631reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چگونه میتوان تشخیص داد که استاد درون وارد عمل شده است؟
پاسخ اشو:
اولین نشانه این است:
احساس خوبی پیدا میکنید.
نسبت به خودتان احساس خوبی پیدا میکنید.
به یاد داشته باشید که شما همیشه درباره خود احساس بدی دارید. تقریبا هرگز با کسی روبرو نمیشوم که درباره خودش احساس خوبی داشته باشد. همه در حال محکوم کردن خود هستند. همه فکر میکنند بد هستند.
وقتی خود را بد میدانید چگونه انتظار دارید دیگران دوستتان داشته باشند؟…
شم…
#سوال_از_اشو
چگونه از درگیری با مسائل و مشکلات دوری کنیم ؟؟؟
#پاسخ
من به شما کلیدی میدهم که همه قفلها با آن گشوده می شود.
با این کلید هیچ دری بسته نمی ماند و آن این است:
خود را با هیچ چیز یکی ندان، تو خویشتنی هستی جدا از تمام مسائل
هرگز به خود نگویید
من خشمگین هستم ...
من غمگین هستم ...
من متعصب هستم...
به یاد داشته باشید خشم مانند ابریست که از بالای سر شما عبور میکند غم و اندوه ، حرص ، شهوت ، وابستگی و تمام چیز…
عرفان؛ آخرین پناهِ نفس
گاهی انسان از خودنماییهای معمول خسته میشود.
دیگر نمیخواهد با ماشینش، لباسش، پولش یا موقعیت اجتماعیاش به دیگران ثابت کند که «کسی» است.
اما نفس نمیمیرد؛ فقط شکلش را عوض میکند.
حالا میگوید:
«من آدم معمولی نیستم؛ من یک انسان معنویام.»
و از اینجا، نمایش جدید شروع میشود.
لباس ساده میپوشد، اما از سادگی خودش لذت میبرد که دیگران آن را ببینند.
از بینیازی حرف میزند، اما دوست دارد دیگر…
وقتی عرفان هم وسیلهی خودنمایی میشود
نفس میتواند هر چیزی را به خدمت خودش بگیرد.
اگر پول داشته باشی، میتواند بگوید: «من از تو ثروتمندترم.»
اگر قدرت داشته باشی، میگوید: «من از تو قدرتمندترم.»
اگر دانش داشته باشی، میگوید: «من بیشتر از تو میدانم.»
و اگر وارد عرفان شوی، همان نفس میتواند لباس معنویت بپوشد و بگوید:
«من از تو آگاهترم.»
«من بیشتر از تو میفهمم.»
«من بیدارم و تو هنوز در خوابی.»
«من انرژیهای بالا…
آیا هرگز شده که وقتی تنها نشسته ای افکارت را مشاهده کنی؟
آیا هرگز اراجیفی که مدام در ذهنت می گذرد را مشاهده کرده ای؟
امیدواری که با این افکار مهمل و پوچ به کجا برسی؟
آنها در تمام طول روز و حتی در تمام طول شب نیز ادامه دارند.
افکار دایره وار در حال چرخش دائمی هستند.
تمام افکار حتی کوچکترین آنها انرژی مصرف می کنند.
دانشمندان به این نتیجه رسیده اند که مقدار انرژی مصرفی برای حفر زمین در هر ساعت ، برابر است با مقدار ان…
انسان آگاه مثل آسمان است،
او در دنیا زندگی میکند
گرسنگی می آید، سیری، تابستان، زمستان، روزهای خوب، روزهای بد، اتفاقات خوب، بسیار مسرور، با ثبات، رضایتمندی، اتفاقات بد، افسردگی، در ته دره تاریک، سوخته، همه چیز می آید و میرود
و او فقط نظاره گر است، به راحتی مینگرد، و میداند که هر چیزی سپری میشود.
خیلی چیزها می آیند و میروند. اما او خود را با هیچکدام مانوس نمیکند.
مانوس نکردن رهبانیت واقعی است.
و رهبانیت بزرگترین …
ذهن بهسادگی دستبردار نیست.
حتی وقتی چیزی را به دست میآوری، خیلی زود به تو میگوید: «حالا چیز دیگری لازم است.» و تو دوباره حرکت میکنی؛ دوباره میدوی، دوباره امیدوار میشوی و دوباره خوشبختی را به آینده منتقل میکنی.
به این ترتیب، زندگی تبدیل به یک انتظار بزرگ میشود؛ انتظار برای روزی که قرار است همهچیز درست شود.
اما آن روز هرگز نمیرسد، زیرا ذهن همیشه میتواند یک «بعداً»ی تازه بسازد.
اگر امروز پول بیشتری داشته…
توده مردم از تو مي خواهند جزيی از آنها شوي، مي خواهند كه عقل و هوش ات را تسليم آنها بكني. مي خواهند به ساز آنها برقصي و به رنگ آنها در آيی،
اين ريشه اصلي نابودي هوشمندي انسان است
و وقتي هوشمندي از بين برود ،
ممكن نيست بداني شادماني چيست.
هر كودكي شادمان بدنيا مي آيد و تقريبا هر كودكي مسموم مي شود.
تا بيايد بفهمد كه با خود چه آورده است، با عنوانهايی زيبا فلج و از كار افتاده مي شود.
ممكن است آنرا تعميد بنامند.
اينها پن…
❤10👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @nazeraramesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 383,814 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اوشو .ناظر” (@nazeraramesh), 5,550 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nazeraramesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.