Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Професіональний Фанат Спорту. Віталій Волочай

Channel

Професіональний Фанат Спорту. Віталій Волочай

@v1latsports

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,156subscribers

+123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233552388
TypeChannel
Username@v1latsports
Created3 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/v1latsports

Growth

17,03317,15617,094.56 August 2026 — 17,033 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,033 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,040 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,050 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,062 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,084 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,079 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,094 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,115 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,137 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,142 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,153 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,156 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net +123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,015–17,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 07:1117,156+3
17 Aug 2026, 09:2417,153+11
15 Aug 2026, 13:4417,142+5
14 Aug 2026, 04:5517,137+22
12 Aug 2026, 22:0417,115+21
11 Aug 2026, 18:3317,094+15
10 Aug 2026, 18:1117,079-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:1217,084+22
8 Aug 2026, 16:5617,062+12
7 Aug 2026, 14:4517,050+10
6 Aug 2026, 18:0017,040+7
6 Aug 2026, 03:3017,033no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:2417,033first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.3%
avg views ÷ 17,156 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,740
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held65 (1 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total437,850
Reactions total9,097
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 54s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,871 reactions across 62 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,47827.9%
😁1,51117.0%
🤣7378.31%
🔥6237.02%
🤯5696.41%
😭3814.29%
👍3624.08%
💯3363.79%
😢3303.72%
🤬2923.29%
🤡2322.62%
🎉1942.19%
🥰1711.93%
😍1051.18%
💩901.01%
🥱670.755%
510.575%
🤮440.496%
👏390.44%
❤‍🔥370.417%
29 further kinds2222.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,097reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 65 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @v1latsports. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈2,890 views63 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @maincast_sportVideo

😀 Вигравай джерсі ФК Харків за коментар під новим випуском «УПЛ Вечірній» Переходь на ютюб, напиши привітання футбольному клубу Харків з 10-річчям і все — ти береш участь в розіграші👇🏻 📺 YouTube ❤️ TG Maincast Sport | Ми в App Store | Ми в Google Play 📺

51🤮7🔥4🏆1

17 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈4,560 views106 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Вмикайте Вечірній. На Київстар ТБ, На Світ ТБ, в кабельних мережах, на сайті чи на Ютубі Будемо розбиратись:)

😍8214🤡54🤝1

17 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,620 views42 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Буде сьогодні про що побалакати😀😀😀

35🤡5👍2

17 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈4,580 views46 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @whowillscore

Полісся – Зоря, 18:00 Іван Нестеренко – 7.50 (betking, суперсаб), 0.625 юніти Антон Глущенко – 10.0 (betking, суперсаб), 0.625 юніти

🔥39🤣51🤔1

17 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈4,670 views38 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Тупо геній на каналі 😀😀😀😀

💯33🤣4🤔1

17 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈5,130 views56 reactionsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEUXqBsFeh8 Сьогодні о 20:00 третій випуск Вечірнього, з підсумками третього туру Будемо розбиратися чи фолив Назарина, що там у Динамо, куди несуться Карпати, будемо вибирати гол тижня, Василь Обараз буде тактично знову щось розбирати, сьогодні це буде трохи по Динамо і трохи по Карпатах А також розіграємо футболку ФК Харків від клубу на честь їх дня народження!

40👍9🤝5👌1🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC≈6,230 views257 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @novak_buildupPhoto

В Жироні великий скандал. Як і минулого літа, в команді багато гравців, що хочуть піти. Але тепер серед головних бунтарів українці. Циганков не зіграв у жодному з товариських матчів. Тоді цю відсутність можна було приховати мовчанням щодо можливих травм чи інших проблем. Але сьогодні стартував сезон Сегунди. Циганков потрапив до заявки Жирони на матч. Щоправда, українець не був навіть на лавці запасних. Циганков с

🤯185🤡25😁239🐳4👎4🙈4👍3

16 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈5,900 views265 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @sportsuspilnePhoto

🥇 Нікіта Шеремет – чемпіон Європи з плавання на дистанції 50 метрів вільним стилем! У фіналі Євро-2026 Шеремет встановив новий рекорд України – 21.13 сек! З цим результатом він виграв "золото"! У цьому ж фіналі змагався Владислав Бухов, який фінішував п'ятим з результатом 21.58 сек.

215🔥32🏆12👍5💘1

16 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈6,720 views174 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Оце халф-тайм шоу у Харкова, а не ця пародія з Нью Йорка

🤣13725👍9🤮2👀1

16 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈6,870 views147 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

О 17:00 коментую матч між Чемпіонами Англії та володарями Кубка Англії за Комуніті Шилд Трансляція матчу буде на платформі Сетанти, або ж на каналі Сетанта Преміум, який доступний лише на Київстар ТБ. Тобто на Мегого чи на Світ ТБ цього матчу не буде Майте на увазі

92😢30👍10🤮7🤣4😡3🤔1

16 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC≈6,920 views145 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Пономарьов псіханув

😁125🤣13👍3💩3🥱1

15 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈6,870 views221 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Ярослава на класі 🫡🏅

183🏆21💯14🦄2💅1

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @v1latsports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTCFinal Results1,010 voters approx.

Найкращий гол другого туру УПЛ:

  1. Максим Брагару (Полісся 😀)46%
  2. Джовані Герберт (Кривбас 😀)42%
  3. Рой Наві (Кривбас 😀)12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTCAnonymous Poll2,250 voters approx.

Обирай найкращий гол першого туру УПЛ:

  1. Владислав Велетень (Полісся 😀)49%
  2. Микола Миронюк (Епіцентр 😀)6%
  3. Георгі Робакідзе (Чорноморець 😀)44%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 134,657 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Спортивна назва
@sportvukr · 103,746
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
ЛЕВИ НА ПОЗАШЛЯХОВИКУ 🇺🇦
@lvinajeepe · 88,179
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
Лебидло
@lebigaa · 427,132
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Професіональний Фанат Спорту. Віталій Волочай” (@v1latsports), 17,156 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v1latsports.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.