Nowa aktualizacja rynkowa WAŻNE: RZADKA ANOMALIA NA BITCOINIE 📊 CO DALEJ? 🔗LINK: https://youtu.be/afnE5yOrG1E?is=FzOa_h8XXX8I9_l5
👍14❤8👌1🤝1🫡1

Channel
@kdpwiadomosci
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
47,054subscribers
-1,139 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001685823161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kdpwiadomosci |
| Description | ✅ Bezpłatny kanał informacyjny numer 1 dla branży kryptowalut. 🔹 Analizy, zestawienia, set-upy, altcoiny. Tutaj wszystkie istotne linki 👇 https://rebrand.ly/darmowa_grupa 📊 (jedyny oficjalny profil) - reszta to oszuści. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kdpwiadomosci |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 47,054 | -208 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 47,262 | -34 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 47,296 | -26 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 47,322 | -43 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 47,365 | -45 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 47,410 | -105 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 47,515 | -53 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 47,568 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:46 | 47,587 | -28 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:03 | 47,615 | -39 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 47,654 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 47,678 | -28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 47,706 | -27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 47,733 | -24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 47,757 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 47,771 | -19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 47,790 | -28 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 47,818 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 47,826 | -43 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 47,869 | first reading |
91 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 91 (29 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 358,800 |
| Reactions total | 5,225 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,956 reactions across 91 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,803 | 48.2% | |
| ❤ | 2,361 | 23.7% | |
| 🌚 | 610 | 6.13% | |
| 🔥 | 428 | 4.30% | |
| 😁 | 282 | 2.83% | |
| 😭 | 275 | 2.76% | |
| 💯 | 186 | 1.87% | |
| 🍾 | 176 | 1.77% | |
| 🤔 | 144 | 1.45% | |
| 👌 | 141 | 1.42% | |
| 🤝 | 136 | 1.37% | |
| 🙈 | 133 | 1.34% | |
| 🫡 | 74 | 0.743% | |
| 🤯 | 46 | 0.462% | |
| 🎉 | 39 | 0.392% | |
| 👏 | 39 | 0.392% | |
| 😢 | 27 | 0.271% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 0.131% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 0.1% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.05% | |
| 8 further kinds | 28 | 0.281% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,956 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nowa aktualizacja rynkowa WAŻNE: RZADKA ANOMALIA NA BITCOINIE 📊 CO DALEJ? 🔗LINK: https://youtu.be/afnE5yOrG1E?is=FzOa_h8XXX8I9_l5
👍14❤8👌1🤝1🫡1
Jak w zegarku. 21 września napływy do ETF-ów na BTC wyniosły $999 mln. Były to największe napływy od ATH w październiku rok temu. Zwykle tak duże zakupy ETF-ów są na lokalnych szczytach. Teraz nie było inaczej. 21 września był lokalnym szczytem na rynku. Warto pamiętać o tej dynamice, bo naprawdę często się sprawdza i zawsze gdy widzimy takie ogromne napływy, warto się na chwilę zatrzymać i zastanowić, czy rynek…
👍234❤26👌9🔥5😁5🐳1🙈1
Dane inflacyjne poniżej oczekiwań Headline PCE w ujęciu miesięcznym wynosioło 0.3% i tu nie mamy zaskoczeń. Jednak w ujęciu rocznym spodziewano się 3.7%, a mamy 3.4% Natomiast Core PCE w ujęciu miesięcznym jak i rocznym poniżej oczekiwań. Bitcoin i kryptowaluty lokalnie reagują bardzo pozytywnie na te dane. BTC znowu zbliżył się do $85,000.
👍66❤17🎉4🤔4
Uważam, że kolejne pół roku na rynku kryptowalut może zaskoczyć wiele osób 📌 Czemu? Daje bardzo małe szanse na to, że cykliczny dołek jest przed nami. ➡️Gdy po potencjalnej korekcie w Q4 nie spadniemy poniżej $70,000 i na dodatek zaczniemy odbijać pod koniec roku, to możemy zobaczyć coś w stylu efektu kuli śnieżnej. Ten cały kapitał na uboczu, który czekał na dołek w październiku, zacznie wchodzić na FOMO, do teg…
👍60❤31🤝7
⚠️ Nowe Q&A już na kanale Ujawniam mój dalszy plan na rozgrywanie Bitcoina. ▶️ZAPRASZAM: https://youtu.be/mOMmgkOVgG8
👍45❤6😁4🤝2🙈2
🪙 Chainlink właśnie zaprezentował CCIP 2.0 Nazwali to infrastrukturą pod kolejne 600 bilionów dolarów, które mają przenieść się na blockchain. Krótkie podsumowanie najważniejszych cytatów, które CBO Chainlinka przekazał w filmie: ➡️"Jesteśmy na skraju największej transformacji jaką kiedykolwiek widzieliśmy. Czeka nas rewolucja w jaki sposób dokonujemy transakcji, wymieniamy wartość i jak działają finanse." ➡️"Każ…
👍79❤31🤯10🔥9🎉2
➡️ Dziś po południu nagrywam Q&A, wleci na YT najpewniej utro. Zbieram pytania tutaj na relacji: https://www.instagram.com/marek_stiller Pytajcie o co chcecie, odpowiem na około 25 najciekawszych. 📷 IG: marek_stiller PS. Przy okazji warto zostawić follow, bo wrzucam tam treści, które nie pojawiają się na Telegramie
👍66❤13😁6
Tydzień temu na Mentoringu pisałem, że przed nami ważny weekend. Wtedy czekaliśmy na pierwsze zamknięcie się świecy tygodniowej nad 50 MA 📈 Dziś już wiemy, że w końcu Bitcoinowi się to udało i to było tak naprawdę jedno z dwóch najważniejszych potwierdzeń przejścia z bessy do hossy. Drugim było to, że przebiliśmy top z maja i wyznaczyliśmy wyższy szczyt, co zmieniło makro strukturę rynku ze spadkowej na wzrostową.…
👍87❤23😁8🔥5
Jedna z największych giełd krypto zhakowana na ~350 milionów USD ❗️ Dziś w nocy giełda BitGet padła ofiarą jednego z największych haków w historii tej branży. Po raz kolejny głównymi podejrzanymi są osoby z grupy Lazarus. To oni również dokonali największej kradzieży w historii rynku krypto na początku 2025, gdy zhakowali Bybita. ➡️W 2026 mieliśmy już kilka negatywnych newsów o CEX-ach. Niektóre po prostu kończą d…
👍37❤17🤯5🙈5🤝3😱3🐳1😁1
Altcoin, którego kupowaliśmy na Dniach Otwartych ZPP, jest najlepiej performującym projektem z top100 za ostatnie 24h. Chodzi o BCH, którego kupowaliśmy 16 września po 217$. Aktualna cena - około 350$, prawie 60% zysku na SPOT. Dostęp do tego zagrania był bezpłatny, wrzuciłem je na mój Mentoring ZPP, już po starcie Dni Otwartych. Czyli każdy kto poświęcił 5 minut, żeby się zapisać - mógł je zobaczyć. Przedwczora…
👍37❤22😁10😭6🤝2🎉1🔥1
Bitcoin się dzisiaj ładnie trzyma tych $86 tysięcy. Na rynku panuje obecnie ekstremalna chciwość Niby wszystko wygląda super; krypto rośnie, a dodatkowo wczoraj: -dostaliśmy rekordowy od miesiąca short squeeze (prawie $1mld) - dostaliśmy rekordowe, najwyższe od 11 miesięcy napływy do BTC ETF ($999mln) Natomiast ja na tym etapie jestem coraz ostrożniejszy. Bitcoin od dołka urósł już 51%. Po drodze zaliczył tylko j…
🍾176❤43🙈15👍12😁7🌚4🤯4🎉2
Bitcoin przebił wczoraj 87 tysięcy USD i na wykresie świec tygodniowych stworzył nam wyższy szczyt. To pierwsza taka sytuacja od początku tej bessy, która daje kolejne potwierdzenie, że rynek niedźwiedzia właśnie się kończy. A wiecie, co to oznacza? Że kolejne miesiące najpewniej dadzą wiele okazji do skutecznego rozgrywania rynku. Macie ten komfort, że jesteście dzisiaj aktywni na tym rynku, przetrwaliście ostatn…
👍36❤21😁9🎉7🌚2🏆1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @kdpwiadomosci. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kdpwiadomosci edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Co we wrześniu/październiku?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KDP - Marek Stiller 🎯” (@kdpwiadomosci), 47,054 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kdpwiadomosci.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.