Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prezes krypto | Robert

Channel

Prezes krypto | Robert

@Prezes_krypto

Not marked by Telegram, checked 11 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,232subscribers

-293 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002201078316
TypeChannel
Username@Prezes_krypto
DescriptionWidziałem już wszystko na rynku kryptowalut Ponad 10 lat w kryptowalutach 😎 Kontrakty terminowe i inwestycje Link do mnie: @Robert_NowakCrypto
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Prezes_krypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,2328,5408,3867 August 2026 — 8,525 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,524 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,501 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,483 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,466 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,442 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,411 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,439 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,513 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,528 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,520 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,494 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,525 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,540 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,501 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,462 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,444 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,419 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,399 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,374 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,361 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,345 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,339 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,312 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,274 subscribers9 November 2026 — 8,232 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,186–8,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 16:368,232-42
6 Nov 2026, 15:578,274-38
3 Nov 2026, 23:578,312-27
31 Oct 2026, 17:118,339-6
28 Oct 2026, 22:088,345-16
25 Oct 2026, 19:468,361-13
23 Oct 2026, 05:088,374-25
19 Oct 2026, 23:178,399-20
17 Oct 2026, 02:118,419-25
14 Oct 2026, 05:308,444-18
10 Oct 2026, 11:388,462-39
4 Oct 2026, 19:208,501-39
25 Sept 2026, 08:588,540+15
15 Sept 2026, 02:178,525+31
11 Sept 2026, 20:198,494-26
7 Sept 2026, 00:178,520-8
2 Sept 2026, 10:168,528+15
30 Aug 2026, 16:588,513+74
27 Aug 2026, 12:188,439+28
24 Aug 2026, 11:388,411first reading

Engagement

275 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.67%
avg views ÷ 8,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
385
113 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
113
of 275 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 105 of 113 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held275 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total43,486
Reactions total5,727
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,540
Videos
≈133
Links
≈6,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,771 reactions across 136 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1,20920.9%
🎉1,15820.1%
👍1,14919.9%
🔥1,13419.6%
❤1,10819.2%
🫡30.052%
🍾20.035%
🏆20.035%
😎20.035%
🍓10.017%
😇10.017%
🤩10.017%
🥰10.017%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 275 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 275 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 113 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 21:10 UTC581 views67 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📊Inwestorzy detaliczni opuścili rynek… Analiza popytu detalicznego wskazuje, że w trakcie tej korekty inwestorzy gwałtownie ograniczyli swoje zaangażowanie na rynku bitcoina. ✅Średni miesięczny wskaźnik zmian popytu spadł obecnie niemal do -10%. Taka zmiana zachowań nastąpiła zaraz po tym, jak popyt detaliczny wzrósł o ponad 17% w miarę zbliżania się ceny bitcoina do poziomu 80 000 dolarów. 👀Jest to najniższy wskaź…

🔥15🎉14👍13👏13❤12

13 Nov 2026, 20:02 UTC605 views57 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

AEVO ❗️Moneta nie zdołała utrzymać poziomu 0,02690$, ponieważ napotkała silną presję sprzedaży, co doprowadziło do spadku o 32%, przez co ponownie powracamy do poziomu wsparcia na 0,01693$. ⚠️Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, sytuacja na rynku altcoinów jest obecnie wyjątkowo niekorzystna, ponieważ aktywność kupujących znacznie spadła – w przypadku większości monet nie obserwuje się popytu, a dynamika bitcoina, biorąc pod uwag…

👍15❤13🔥12🎉10👏7

13 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC621 views57 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

UNI ⚠️Przez prawie cały październik i początek listopada kurs utrzymywał się w przedziale 6,008–7,087 USD, jednak aktywo nie wytrzymało presji i ostatecznie spadło. Ten ruch może oznaczać początek pełnej korekty. 👀Straciliśmy poziom wsparcia na 6$, a na tych poziomach nie obserwujemy jak dotąd aktywnego wykupu ze strony dużych nabywców spotowych, dlatego nic nie stoi na przeszkodzie, aby sprzedający dalej obniżali …

❤14👍13👏12🎉10🔥8

13 Nov 2026, 16:48 UTC632 views69 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Każdy z was może ze mną współpracować Witaj w moim zespole 🤝Napisz, jeśli jesteś zainteresowany sygnałami — @Robert_NowakCrypto

👏16🎉15👍15🔥13❤10

13 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC650 views61 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

✅Od 2014 roku kurs bitcoina zamykał się poniżej swojej 200-tygodniowej średniej w mniej niż jednym na dziesięć tygodni. Dziś rano po raz pierwszy od sierpnia spadł poniżej tego poziomu. ✍️ Skontaktuj się ze mną 👨‍💻 Handluję tutaj

🔥18❤12👏12🎉11👍8

13 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC654 views57 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

otworzył nową pozycję ✍️ Skontaktuj się ze mną 👨‍💻 Handluję tutaj

🔥22❤10👍9🎉8👏8

13 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC674 views64 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

👮‍♂️TRM Labs zaprezentowało Beacon Concierge, platformę umożliwiającą organom ścigania szybkie śledzenie i blokowanie nielegalnych środków w kryptowalutach w różnych blockchainach. 💥Możliwości i skala systemu: Do sieci podłączonych jest ponad 200 uczestników, w tym giełdy kryptowalut i emitenci stablecoinów. Odpowiadają oni za około 80% wolumenu obrotu kryptowalutami. Sieć Beacon przechwyciła już podejrzane środki o…

🎉20🔥14👏12👍10❤8

13 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTC674 views61 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📊Inwestorzy detaliczni aktywnie sprzedają swoje aktywa, podczas gdy cena bitcoina spada, ale duzi inwestorzy nadal posiadają znacznie więcej BTC niż w grudniu. Inwestorzy detaliczni wpadają w panikę, ale posiadacze dużych portfeli nie wycofują się ✍️ Skontaktuj się ze mną 👨‍💻 Handluję tutaj

🔥18❤14👏13👍9🎉7

13 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC694 views66 reactionsread 14 November 2026

👀Wielokrotnie ostrzegałem was przed spadkiem ceny bitcoina do poziomu 70 tys. i poniżej. ❗️Co więcej, nadal uważam, że jest za wcześnie, by mówić o cyklu hossy. Nie jestem nawet pewien, czy bessy już się skończyła. Wszystko jest zbyt spokojne – nie ma dużych likwidacji pozycji, bankructw funduszy ani firm, nie ma też poważnych światowych kryzysów ani spraw sądowych. 👀Nie ma nawet paniki. Ludzie spokojnie podchodzą …

❤15🎉15🔥14👍11👏11

12 Nov 2026, 20:55 UTC744 views69 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚠️Ponad co trzeci bitcoin, których łączna wartość przekracza 500 miliardów dolarów, jest obecnie narażony na ryzyko związane z przyszłymi komputerami kwantowymi. 👀Dane Glassnode wskazują, że 7,12 miliona BTC, czyli 35,4% całkowitej podaży, posiada klucze publiczne, które są już widoczne w łańcuchu bloków. Większość adresów bitcoinowych ujawnia swój klucz publiczny przy pierwszej wysyłce środków z danego adresu. ❗️W…

🎉19🔥16👏13👍12❤9

12 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC740 views59 reactionsread 14 November 2026

💥W obliczu spadku kursu BTC obserwuje się intensywną wyprzedaż ze strony inwestorów detalicznych, jednak duzi inwestorzy nadal posiadają znacznie więcej BTC niż w grudniu. Inwestorzy detaliczni wpadają w panikę, ale posiadacze dużych portfeli nie opuszczają rynku. ✍️ Skontaktuj się ze mną 👨‍💻 Handluję tutaj

🎉18👍14🔥12👏11❤4

12 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC735 views73 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

👀Nawet na rynku hossy bitcoin zamyka się na nowym cyklicznym maksimum zaledwie mniej więcej raz na dziesięć dni. Większą część trendu hossy trzeba spędzić w oczekiwaniu, a nie na wzroście ✍️ Skontaktuj się ze mną 👨‍💻 Handluję tutaj

👏18👍17🎉16❤11🔥11

Showing the 12 most recent of 275 posts we hold for @Prezes_krypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @Prezes_krypto as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Łukasz Michałek (Rare Crypto Signals)
@rarecryptosignals · 35,242
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
KDP - Marek Stiller 🎯
@kdpwiadomosci · 45,871
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prezes krypto | Robert” (@Prezes_krypto), 8,232 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Prezes_krypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.