Channel
@karbalashia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001785028066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @karbalashia |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 21 November 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/karbalashia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 82 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 68 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 68 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 November 2022 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,190 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2022 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سخن باطل و غیر ثقلینی مطهری ❌مرتضی مطهری: و امامحسین ( ع ) را شیعیانش کشتند ، لذا در همان زمان هم میگفتند : قلوبهم معه و سیوفهم علیه 📚حماسه حسینی 1 جلد 1 صفحه 171 ابطال این سخن طبق دهها مطلب همین کانال ثابت می شود.
👍1
قاتلین امام حسین صلوات الله علیه که خدا لعنتشان کند شیعه که هیچ، حتی یکتاپرست هم نبودند. آیا موحدی پیدا می شود تا مرا یاری کند؟! ●قَالَ وَ لَمَّا رَأَى الْحُسَيْنُ صلوات الله علیه مَصَارِعَ فِتْيَانِهِ وَ أَحِبَّتِهِ عَزَمَ عَلَى لِقَاءِ الْقَوْمِ بِمُهْجَتِهِ وَ نَادَى هَلْ مِنْ ذَابٍّ يَذُبُّ عَنْ حَرَمِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ (صلی الله علیه و آله) هَلْ مِنْ مُوَحِّدٍ يَخَافُ اللَّهَ فِينَا هَلْ مِنْ مُغِيثٍ يَرْجُو الل…
👍1💔1
موثق بودن حضرت مختار علیه الرحمة نزد امام حسین صلوات الله علیه ●...ثُمَّ طَوَى الكِتابَ وخَتَمَهُ ، ودَعا بِمُسلمِ بنِ عَقيلٍ فَدَفَعَ إلَيهِ الكِتابَ ، وقالَ لَهُ : إنّي مُوَجِّهُكَ إلى أهلِ الكوفَةِ وهذِهِ كُتُبُهُم إلَيَّ ، وسَيَقضِي اللّه ُ مِن أمرِكَ ما يُحِبُّ ويَرضى ، وأنَا أرجو أن أكونَ أنَا وأنتَ في دَرَجَةِ الشُّهَداءِ ، فَامضِ عَلى بَرَكَةِ اللّه ِ حَتّى تَدخُلَ الكوفَةَ، فَإِذا دَخَلتَها فَانزِل عِندَ أو…
📣💌رسالة من الشعب العراقي إلى إخوتهم الزائرين الإيرانيين حفظهم الله ووفقهم 💞نامه اى از عراقيها به برادران وخواهران ايرانى خود به مناسبت ايام اربعين بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم أخي الزائر الإيراني العزيز: أهلاً بك في أرض العراق التي قال فيها الإمام الصادق عليه السلام: تربة تحبنا ونحبها لا تسأل عن ثمن الخدمات التي يقدمها لك أخوك العراقي، فأنت في العراق بلد الضيافة والكرم، ولن نقصر في خدمة الحسين عليه السلام ما دمنا أحياء …
❤1
❌ قاتلان سید الشهدا علیه السلام از شیعیان نبودند! 1⃣ حضرت سيّدالشهداء عليه السلام در روز عاشورا در ضمن سخنانى، دشمنان اهل بيت عليهم السلام را اين گونه توصيف نمودند و فرمودند: همانا شما در زمره سركشان امت، پشت كنندگان به قرآن، هم دم هاى شيطان، گروهى معصيت كار، تحريف كنندگان قرآن، از بين برنده سنّت ها، قاتلان فرزندان انبيا و... هستيد. شما فرزندان ابن حرب و پيروان (معاويه) هستيد و هدف شما فقط از بين بردن ماست. ✅ اين س…
#قاتل_حسین_علیهالسلام_کیست؟ #مطاعن_اهل_البدع #دشمن_شناسی #مطاعن_عمر #عمر_شناسی شمر بن ذی الجوشن : من به فتوای عمر بن خطاب لعنهماالله در قتل حسین علیه السلام عمل کردم😡‼️[ مصادر مخالفین ] ┄┅━✺❖✺━┅┄ ⫸ اهلسنت روایاتی دارند که حكم حاكم محترم است ولو اينكه جانیِ جائر باشد ، مال مردم را بگيرد و آنها را شلاق بزند ، در نواميس مردم تصرف كند به انواع فحشا و منكرات مشغول باشد بر تمام اُمت است كه امر او را إطاعت كنند و گوش …
شیعیان؟؟؟ نه خیر! یک مشت ملحد با امام حسین صلوات الله علیه جنگیدند. ●أَشْهَدُ أَنَّكَ ... جَاهَدْتَ اَلْمُلْحِدِينَ ●شهادت می دهم که تو (یعنی امام حسین صلوات الله علیه) ... با ملحدین جنگیدی. مصباح الزائر : ص 252 ، المزار الكبير : ص 435 ح 4 ، كامل الزيارات : ص 375 ح 621 نحوه، المصباح للكفعمي : ص 663 بحار الأنوار - ط مؤسسةالوفاء جلد 101 صفحه 230 مفاتیح الجنان زیارت مطلقه سوم امام حسین صلوات الله علیه این کانال مطا…
❤2
🔰 #پرسش_و_پاسخ از حضرت آیت الله میلانی مد ظله العالی 🔄 به زبانهای #فارسی #انگلیسی ❓پرسش "محرم زمان خوب نگریستن است نه خوب گریستن، نماد شعور است نه شور، منتظران مهدی به هوش باشند که حسین را منتظرانش کشتند." با سلام این متن و پاراف اخیراً بین مردم زیاد رد و بدل میشود و حتی گاهی بر زبان منور الافکارها هم صادر میشود. من به نظر قاصرم نباید با آموزههای دینی و روایی ما سازگار باشد، علی الخصوص این قسمت آخر که منتظران ام…
❤1
خُطبَةُ فاطِمَةَ الصُّغرى في أهلِ الكوفَةِ خطبه حضرت فاطمه صغری صلوات الله علیها در کوفه (بخش اول) ●وَ رَوَى زَيْدُ بْنُ مُوسَى قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي عَنْ جَدِّي الامام الصادق صلوات الله علیهم قَالَ خَطَبَتْ فَاطِمَةُ الصُّغْرَى صلوات الله علیها بَعْدَ أَنْ وَرَدَتْ مِنْ كَرْبَلَاءَ فَقَالَتْ: الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ عَدَدَ الرَّمْلِ وَ الْحَصَى وَ زِنَةَ الْعَرْشِ إِلَى الثَّرَى أَحْمَدُهُ وَ أُومِنُ بِهِ وَ أَتَوَكَّل…
خُطبَةُ فاطِمَةَ الصُّغرى في أهلِ الكوفَةِ خطبه حضرت فاطمه صغری صلوات الله علیها در کوفه (بخش دوم) ●...أَمَّا بَعْدُ يَا أَهْلَ الْكُوفَةِ يَا أَهْلَ الْمَكْرِ وَ الْغَدْرِ وَ الْخُيَلَاءِ فَإِنَّا أَهْلُ بَيْتٍ ابْتَلَانَا اللَّهُ بِكُمْ وَ ابْتَلَاكُمْ بِنَا فَجَعَلَ بَلَاءَنَا حَسَناً وَ جَعَلَ عِلْمَهُ عِنْدَنَا وَ فَهْمَهُ لَدَيْنَا فَنَحْنُ عَيْبَةُ عِلْمِهِ وَ وِعَاءُ فَهْمِهِ وَ حِكْمَتِهِ وَ حُجَّتُهُ عَلَى…
خُطبَةُ فاطِمَةَ الصُّغرى في أهلِ الكوفَةِ خطبه حضرت فاطمه صغری صلوات الله علیها در کوفه (بخش سوم وآخر) ●...وَيْلَكُمْ أَ تَدْرُونَ أَيَّةُ يَدٍ طَاغَتْنَا مِنْكُمْ وَ أَيَّةُ نَفْسٍ نَزَعَتْ إِلَى قِتَالِنَا أَمْ بِأَيَّةِ رِجْلٍ مَشَيْتُمْ إِلَيْنَا تَبْغُونَ مُحَارَبَتَنَا وَ اللَّهِ قَسَتْ قُلُوبُكُمْ وَ غَلُظَتْ أَكْبَادُكُمْ وَ طُبِعَ عَلَى أَفْئِدَتِكُمْ وَ خُتِمَ عَلَى سَمْعِكُمْ وَ بَصَرِكُمْ وَ سَوَّلَ لَك…
#اللهم_عجل_لولیک_الفرج #بیست_وپنجم_جمادی_الاول_شهادت_سلیمان_صردخزاعی و جمعی از شیعیان . بیست و پنجم ماه جمادی الاول سال ۶۵هجری قمری مطابق با بیستم دی سال ۶۳هجری شمسی جناب سلیمان بن صرد خزاعی علیه السلام و جمع کثیری از شیعیان، اولین خونخواهان امام حسین علیه السلام به شهادت رسیدند. #جناب_سلیمان_صرد ازاصحاب پیامبر وامیرالمؤمنین علیهماالسلام بودند و درجنگها در رکاب مولا شمشیر میزدند. ایشان یکی ازبزرگان و #اعاظم_شیعه درک…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @karbalashia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 457,899 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آیا شیعیان امام حسین علیه السلام را شهید کردند؟” (@karbalashia), 82 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karbalashia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.