Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Traders por el mundo

Channel

Traders por el mundo

@oficialtradersporelmundo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,693subscribers

-271 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001734481054
TypeChannel
Username@oficialtradersporelmundo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oficialtradersporelmundo

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,69313,96413,828.514 August 2026 — 13,964 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,958 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,947 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,934 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,928 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,918 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,905 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,903 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,890 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,875 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,870 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,866 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,864 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,861 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,855 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,852 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,838 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,831 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,823 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,806 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,779 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,748 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,739 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,730 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,706 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,693 subscribers14 August 202619 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 37 days, net -271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,652–14,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:2013,693-13
17 Sept 2026, 03:1913,706-24
15 Sept 2026, 01:5813,730-9
13 Sept 2026, 11:4013,739-9
11 Sept 2026, 18:3713,748-31
9 Sept 2026, 05:5713,779-27
5 Sept 2026, 20:1413,806-17
3 Sept 2026, 19:4213,823-8
2 Sept 2026, 08:5613,831-7
1 Sept 2026, 07:1613,838-14
31 Aug 2026, 10:3613,852-3
30 Aug 2026, 11:1713,855-6
29 Aug 2026, 14:4613,861-3
28 Aug 2026, 11:4713,864-2
27 Aug 2026, 08:4213,866-4
26 Aug 2026, 08:3313,870-5
25 Aug 2026, 07:5213,875-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:4513,878-12
22 Aug 2026, 21:1513,890-13
21 Aug 2026, 13:2813,903first reading

Engagement

155 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.72%
avg views ÷ 13,693 subscribers
Avg views / post
510
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.319%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
81
of 155 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held155 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total41,282
Reactions total54
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 57s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 46 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3337.5%
👍2427.3%
🔥2225.0%
👏66.82%
😁11.14%
😐11.14%
🤔11.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC439 viewsread 2 September 2026

Aquellos que quieran información del canal de señales https://wa.me/message/YTVIQDMJNVP3O1

2 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC408 viewsread 2 September 2026

Recuerden que el único requisito es estar bajo nuestro Ib en el Broker de pepperstone

2 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC416 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Les regalo unas entradas que mandó al canal de señales!!

Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @oficialtradersporelmundo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

Que opinan? Quieren señales y parámetros de entrada de los análisis diarios 🇨🇦🇪🇺🪙

  1. Sii, al fin 🙌🏻90%
  2. No, voy a seguir viendo los análisis por mi cuenta10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CAPITAL TRADING®
@CapitalTradingPE · 22,176
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
TRADING LAB
@institucionaltradinglab · 26,068
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
Wealthy Trades
@wealthytradesacademy · 118,839
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
SV3 TRADING 📉 Grupo FREE | Forex Signals 🇪🇸🇬🇧
@Signalsfreeforex · 39,550
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
PabloGilTraderOficial
@PabloGilTraderOficial · 47,951
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Trading Algorítmico MQL5
@mql5es · 45,474
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 August 2026
Alex Ruiz | Canal Oficial
@joinalexruiz · 34,821
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Traders por el mundo” (@oficialtradersporelmundo), 13,693 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oficialtradersporelmundo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.