Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
10,300 average views per post against 11,724 subscribers — an engagement rate of 88.1%. Across the 7,490 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,611 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.83% and 17.6%, with a median of 8.86%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
26 of 26 published in the window (0 exact, 26 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
268,530
Mature posts only
90.3% over 25 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -369. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,669–12,148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:23
11,724
-128
11 Aug 2026, 05:05
11,852
-148
10 Aug 2026, 02:41
12,000
-18
9 Aug 2026, 03:12
12,018
-26
8 Aug 2026, 06:01
12,044
-40
7 Aug 2026, 02:58
12,084
-9
6 Aug 2026, 23:32
12,093
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
88.1%
avg views ÷ 11,724 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (22 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
268,530
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈717
Videos
≈462
Links
≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
26m 15s
Average length
2m 38s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📻⬜️دکتر روح الله مدبر تحلیلگر خبرگزاری اسپوتنیک روسیه در گفتوگوی زنده با رادیو ملی گفتوگو به بررسی اهداف سفر نخست وزیر روسیه 🇷🇺 به قرقیزستان و اجلاس شورای بین دولتی مقامات ارشد کشورهای اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا پرداخت.
📎 لینک کامل گفتوگو با رادیو ملی گفتوگو در ابتدای کپشن خبر 🔼
⬜️روح الله مدبر:آمریکا به ایران تجاوز کرده
اما ظریف به روسیه میتازد!!!
⬜️روحالله مدبر: ترامپ صبح تا شب با ادبیات تهدید صحبت میکند اما چرا یک بار هم کسی از جریان غربگرا مثل ظریف جواب تهدیداتش را نمیدهد و همواره مدعیاند چین و روسیه به درد نمیخورند.
🔽
این جریان و ظریف مدعی بود اگر کاندیدای مد نظرشان در انتخابات رای نیاورد، جنگ میشود. امروز ظریف باید به واسطه دوقطبی سازی های ضد امنیت ملی اش به افکار عمومی پاسخ…
📝⬜️روح الله مدبر تحلیلگر خبرگزاری اسپوتنیک روسیه در یادداشت اختصاصی روزنامه اخبار صنعت:
🔽
برنامه محور آنگلوساکسونی تبلیغ انحراف فکری سرآغازی برای ایجاد انقلاب های رنگی و کودتاهای سیاسی .
◀️محور آنگلوساکسونی در راستای تحقق خواسته های خود با تبلیغات فراوان اذهان عمومی جوامع مختلف را به سمت ارزش های غربی پیش می برد و آنها را به این سمت سوق می دهد که از ارزش ها و سنت های جامعه خود دور شوند و فرهنگ اروپایی را مورد توجه …
⬜️روحالله مدبر: مسئله ظریف با روسیه شخصی است، ظریف از اینکه در دوره توافق ذلت بار برجام آقای لاوروف آمد قاطعانه به وی اعلام کرد که مکانیسم ماشه خطاست ، از روسها کینه دارد.
🔸
حتی صالحی عضو تیم مذاکره اومد گفت آقای لاوروف چندین بار به ما هشدار داد زیر بار مکانیسم ماشه نرید ، مکانیسم ماشه امنیت ملی ایران رو تهدید میکنه ، خطرناکه اینکارو انجام ندید به ظریف هم چندین بار گفت!
🔸جالبه خود آقای لاوروف میگه ظریف بعد میره …
⬜️ روحالله مدبر: ترامپ به ایران هتاکی میکند و از توافق خارج میشود، آن وقت پزشکیان به یک برگ تفاهمنامه با قاتل رهبر گرانقدر شهید میگوید مرکز ثقل روابط خارجی!!!
🔽
اصلا روسیه و چین ماندهاند که آقا فاز شما چیست؟! آمریکا، کشور متجاوز است و نصف روز را فقط به ایران فحاشی و تهدید میکند.
قطعا چیزی به اسم حقوق بینالملل وجود ندارد، اگر بود آمریکا این جنایات را در حق ملت عزیز ایران نمیکرد.
◀️امروز اولین اصل در امنیت مل…
◀️پزشکیان توافق نظامی با آقای پوتين را رد کرد!
⬜️روحالله مدبر: روسیه در صورت وجود توافق دفاع متقابل میتوانست به صورت مستقیم از ایران حمایت کند اما حذف بند دفاع متقابل از توافق راهبردی ایران و روسیه مانع چنین اقدامی شد.
🇷🇺روسیه با تامین اطلاعات ماهوارهای و پرتاب ماهوارههای ایرانی، نقش مهمی در انهدام اهداف آمریکا توسط ایران داشته اما ظاهرا عدهای توقع دارند که آقای پوتین، خودش لباس رزم بپوشد و به نفع ایران وارد …
⬜️روحالله مدبر: ظریف، اتقوالله!
◀️ روحالله مدبر: روسیه گفته که ما تحت هیچ فشاری حمایت از ایران را کم نخواهیم کرد. همین الان روسیه مانع از اجماع جهانی علیه ایران در سازمان ملل شده وگرنه قطعنامه فصل هفت علیه ایران تصویب میکنند.
◀️اتفاقا الان ظریف با روسستیزی میخواهد روابط ایران و روسیه را تخریب کرده و اجماع جهانی علیه ایران ایجاد کند. آقای ظریف اتقوالله.
◀️خط انرژی را دنبال کنيد
🌐 مصاحبه کامل را در یوتیوب و آ…
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⬜️روح الله مدبر: زلنسکی از حمله به کشتی ایرانی امتیاز گرفت و هیچ عذرخواهی نکرد.
🗣
روحالله مدبر، کارشناس مسائل اوراسیا، در گفتوگو با شیوا آبشناس، خبرنگار اسپوتنیک در تهران، اعلام کرد که رژیم کییف هیچ عذرخواهی رسمی از ایران به دلیل حمله به کشتی ایرانی در دریای کاسپین انجام نداد و توییت وزیر خارجه این رژیم پس از گفتوگو با عراقچی، گستاخانه و تهدیدآمیز بود.
♥️به گفته وی، زلنسکی با افتخار مسئولیت این حمله را ب…
✔️⬜️دکتر روح الله مدبر در گفتوگو با خبرگزاری تاس روسیه🇷🇺:
✔️
رژیم کیف با حمله به تفرجگاههای ساحلی روسیه، راه آلمان نازی را ادامه میدهد
◀️مدبر خاطرنشان کرد، واضح است که جنایات رژیم کیف در کشتار غیر نظامیان با حمایت و هماهنگی کامل کشورهای ناتو انجام میشود.
🌐هر کشور و سازمان بین المللی که در برابر جنایات رژیم کیف سکوت کند در این جنایات شریک است
https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/27985509
⬜️روحالله مدبر، کارشناس مسائل روسیه:
◀️استمرار و تکرار مواضع ضد روسی گسترده ظریف، قطعاً مغایر با منافع و امنیت ملی ایران است/ نوک پیکان انتقادات ظریف به جای آمریکای متجاوز، سمت دوستان حقیقی ایران است.
🔹
اینجانب در ابتدا ظریف را به تقوا و عدم هر نوع اختلافافکنی علیه امنیت ملی توصیه میکنم؛
چراکه در شرایط جنگی که محور فاشیستی آنگلوساکسونی علیه ایران ایجاد کرده است، ایشان علیه دوستان و متحدین حقیقی ایران، بهویژه رو…
📻 صوت_جلسه دوره آموزشی دانشگاه "حضرت امام صادق علیه السلام"
🎙بخش اول؛ تاریخچه
📝🇷🇺 موضوع: جریان شناسی رسانه های روسیه
⬜️سخنران:
دکتر روح الله مدبر
پژوهشگر و مدرس مسائل روسیه 🇷🇺
تحلیلگر خبرگزاری اسپوتنیک⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
🗓️ تاریخ برگزاری: مردادماه 1405
✉️
✔️دوره جریان شناسی رسانه های بین المللی.
🔽
استفاده از محتوی این فایل صوتی آموزشی، شرعا و قانونا با ذکر منبع سخنرانی دکتر مدبر مجاز است.
📎فایل صوتی در ابتدای کپشن 🔼
📹⬜️دکتر روح الله مدبر: باید از NPT خارج شد.
🔽
استراتژی آمریکا استمرار توهین،تهدید و کسب حداکثر امتیاز در میز مذاکرات یک طرفه است.
جریان غربگرای امضا کننده مکانیسم ماشه و برجام همواره بر خلاف منافع ملت ایران به آمریکا امتیازات گسترده داده اند.
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @drromodaber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 809,183 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@drromodaber named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ir_sputnik named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرنامه نامحرمانه” (@drromodaber), 11,724 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drromodaber.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.