Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
10,800 average views per post against 12,554 subscribers — an engagement rate of 86.4%. Across the 7,801 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.63% and 16.9%, with a median of 8.53%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
25 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
271,220
Mature posts only
89.7% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,597–15,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 14:05
11,799
-143
9 Nov 2026, 17:51
11,942
-99
8 Nov 2026, 09:40
12,041
-160
7 Nov 2026, 03:07
12,201
-325
6 Nov 2026, 02:00
12,526
-28
4 Nov 2026, 22:36
12,554
-1
3 Nov 2026, 21:20
12,555
-4
2 Nov 2026, 18:21
12,559
-8
1 Nov 2026, 21:46
12,567
-49
31 Oct 2026, 19:56
12,616
-47
30 Oct 2026, 19:46
12,663
-98
29 Oct 2026, 16:50
12,761
-535
28 Oct 2026, 18:47
13,296
-72
27 Oct 2026, 18:30
13,368
-31
26 Oct 2026, 17:36
13,399
-81
25 Oct 2026, 14:08
13,480
-44
24 Oct 2026, 12:15
13,524
+2,494
23 Oct 2026, 09:15
11,030
-1,685
22 Oct 2026, 06:44
12,715
-65
21 Oct 2026, 01:39
12,780
first reading
Engagement
87 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
108.3%
avg views ÷ 11,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,800
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
38
of 87 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
87 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
485,380
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈755
Videos
≈512
Links
≈1,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 21m
Average length
2m 15s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 26 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (68.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⬜️روح الله مدبر: رژیم کییف هیچ راهی جز پذیرش کلیه شروط روسیه ندارد
♥️تحلیل روح الله مدبر، کارشناس مسائل بین الملل در خصوص برگزاری نشست سه جانبه روسیه، اوکراین و آمریکا در ابوظبی.
🛰 Sputnik Iran | Rubika | Bale | Web
☢️⬜️روحالله مدبر:وقت تغییر راهبرد هستهای ایران فرا رسیده است؟
⬜️روحالله مدبر، کارشناس مسائل بینالملل: اگر رئیسجمهور بودم، همان صبح حمله آمریکا به بیت رهبری تصمیم میگرفتم ایران به سمت بازدارندگی هستهای برود.
🔹
معتقدم اگر ایران از NPT خارج بشه و آزمایش سلاح هستهای انجام بدهد، روسیه فقط یک محکومیت لفظی و تشریفاتی خواهد کرد.
🔹حتی یک گرم از اورانیوم غنیشده ایران نباید از کشور خارج یا رقیقسازی بشه. نباید تجربه گ…
⬜️روح الله مدبر: ناتو داشت ایران را تست میکرد؛ ما چه کردیم؟!
🌐⬜️دکتر روحالله مدبر، کارشناس روابط بینالملل و مسائل روسیه، با انتقاد از نحوه مواجهه مسئولان با حمله به کشتی ایرانی و کشتهشدن ملوان کشورمان، این اقدام را یک آزمون برای سنجش واکنش ایران از سوی ناتو توصیف کرد.
⬜️مدبر با تأکید بر ضرورت پاسخ مقتدرانه به چنین اقداماتی گفت: در شرایط جنگی باید پیام قدرت با پشتوانه صادر شود و تصمیمگیریها در یک اتاق فرماندهی…
⭕️⬜️روحالله مدبر:ایجاد معماری امنیتی مشترک در منطقه با مشارکت ایران و روسیه
⬜️مدبر، کارشناس مسائل روسیه در گفتوگو با #جریان:
◀️سفر سرلشگر محسن رضایی به مسکو و دیدار با آقای ولادیمیر پوتین در راستای پیام رهبر انقلاب و با هدف ترسیم نقشه راه توسعه مناسبات راهبردی ایران و روسیه در شرایط جدید منطقهای و بینالمللی انجام شده است.
◀️از مهمترین محورهای این سفر، بررسی راهکارهای تعمیق همکاریهای دو کشور، رفع موانع اقتصادی …
🌐⬜️روح الله مدبر تحلیلگر خبرگزاری اسپوتنیک روسیه در گفتوگو با روزنامه اخبار صنعت:اروپا در پشتیبانی از تجاوز آمریکا علیه ایران نقش مستقیم داشت
🌐
تحلیلگر خبرگزاری اسپوتنیک روسیه با اشاره به نقش مستقیم کشورهای اروپایی در تجاوز آمریکا و اسرائیل علیه ایران، گفت: حمایت های لجستیکی، اطلاعاتی، مالی و سیاسی اروپا از این تجاوز، بر اساس شواهد و دادههای عیان قابل بررسی است و محدود به اقدامات پنهان اطلاعاتی نیست.
📎لینک گفتوگو…
⬜️روح الله مدبر در جدال،تهدید ضمنی اروپا به حمله موشکی ایران: سقف ۲۰۰۰ کیلومتری برداشته شد
همراه با دکتر روح الله مدبر،
یکشنبه هفدهم ابان بعد از نیمه شب زنده از یوتیوب جدال
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA33Yx-z6wI
📻⬜️دکتر روحالله مدبر تحلیلگر خبرگزاری اسپوتنیک روسیه در گفتوگوی زنده با رادیو ملی گفتوگو آخرین تحولات بحران اوکراین را تشریح نمود.
⬜️
مدبر در این گفتگو همچنین به تبیین دقیق ماجرای کشف شکنجهگاههای غیر رسمی رژیم کییف در پتروپافلیوسکا و جنایات نظامیان اوکراین به دستور زلنسکی و ناتو علیه مردمی که مخالف حضور در جنگ هستند پرداخت.
📻 فایل صوتی کامل گفتوگو با رادیو ملی گفتوگو در ابتدای کپشن خبر
🔼🔼🔼🔼🔼🔼
⭕️📻 دکتر روحالله مدبر تحلیلگر خبرگزاری اسپوتنیک روسیه در گفتوگوی زنده با رادیو ملی ایران به تحلیل پیام مهم رهبری انقلاب و محور های گفتوگوی آقای پوتین رئیس جمهور روسیه و سرلشگر رضایی دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی ایران و سایر اهداف سفر هیأت عالی امنیتی ایران به روسیه پرداخت.
📻 ⭕️
فایل صوتی کامل گفتوگو با رادیو ایران در ابتدای کپشن خبر
🔼🔼🔼
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️📹روح الله مدبر، تحلیلگر مسائل بین الملل به اسپوتنیک: کشف شکنجهگاههای غیر رسمی رژیم فاشیستی کییف خبر بسیار مهمی است که جامعه جهانی را به شوک فرو برده است
🗣مدبر در ادامه افزود: لازم است اشاره کنم سال 2014 هم که کودتا و انقلاب رنگینی را رژیم کییف، فاشیست های نئونازی آن صورت دادند مصادیق مشابهی از این شکنجگاه ها را در بخشهای مختلف حومه کییف ایجاد کرده بودند و مردمی را که حامی دولت قانونی بودند را در آنجا …
⬜️روح الله مدبر در برنامه به وقت ایران پاسخ داد:تحلیل روسها از جنگ محتمل بعدی چگونه است؟
🗣روحالله مدبر؛ کارشناس مسائل روسیه
📹برنامه 288 | 14 آبانماه 1405
📹برنامه به وقت ایران - شبکه خبر
📹 هرشب حوالی ساعت ۱۹:۱۰
🔻🔻🔻
کانال رسمی برنامه به وقت ایران شبکه خبر
@bevaqteiran
⬜️روح الله مدبر در گفتوگو با برنامه به وقت ایران پاسخ داد:محتوای جلسه سرلشگر رضایی با آقای پوتین چه بود؟
📹روحالله مدبر؛ کارشناس مسائل روسیه
📹برنامه 288 | 14 آبانماه 1405
📹برنامه به وقت ایران - شبکه خبر
📹 هرشب حوالی ساعت ۱۹:۱۰
🔻🔻🔻
کانال رسمی برنامه به وقت ایران شبکه خبر
@bevaqteiran
⬜️به نام خدا
خدا رو شکر، در برنامه روز دوشنبه گذشته با رفیق و برادر عزیزم آقای علیزاده، خبر ناگفته ای در خصوص دعوت جناب آقای پوتین رئیس جمهور محترم فدراسیون روسیه از آقای سرلشگر رضایی دبیر محترم شورای امنیت ملی به روسیه را اعلام نموده بودم که خدا رو شکر، این ملاقات مهم و ارسال پیامی بسیار ویژه صورت گرفت.
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @drromodaber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@drromodaber edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@drromodaber named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ir_sputnik named in 19 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
جنگ پژوهی🪖 @updateworlddnews · 49,493 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
نرخ دلار، یورو، پوند | بن بست | Bonbast @bonbast_exchange · 20,076 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرنامه نامحرمانه” (@drromodaber), 11,799 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drromodaber.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.