Channel
@ibvnrsgnc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
85subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002117457671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ibvnrsgnc |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ibvnrsgnc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 85 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 85 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (13 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,011 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 50.0% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 32.1% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نقد الفقيه السيد علي السيستاني لمنهج تعويض الاسانيد: في شهر رمضان سنة ١٣٨٣هـ الموافق سنة ١٩٦٤م كان السيد علي الحسيني السيستاني -حفظه الله- يدرس الرجال وعلوم الحديث، وتعرض في بحوثه لنقد منهج الاردبيلي -رحمه الله- ورسالته في تعويض الاسانيد الضعيفة. هناك رسالة قررها بشكل مختصر السيد محمد الحسيني الجلالي -رحمه الله- لبحث استاذه السيد السيستاني. قال السيد الجلالي:«وحيث ان الاستاذ المحقق السيد علي السيستاني -دام ظله- ب…
وثائق pinned a photo
بعد 5 سنوات من الخدمة في المجموعة -طريق النجاة- وتوالي الإدارات عليها وعدة حوارات وكانت نعم المجموعة التي كانت شوكة في عيون المخالفين، جاء الإجماع بين الفريق الإداري الرئيسي للنجاة وبمباركة الأستاذ عراق الحسين وهو الأب الروحي للمجموعة وبموافقتي كمالك شرعي للمجموعة وبرضا الأستاذ مسلم الموالي كمالك رسمي للنجاة تقرر ما يلي: 1- تحويل المجموعة الى مجموعة فقهية يتملكها الأستاذ علي سلام 2- إخلاء الذمة للقيادة السابقة المتمث…
🕊1
📌من أصعب المسائل التي يبتلى بها المحاور -ومن أقبح المسائل- أن يقول قولا ويتحاشى أن يتراجع عنه حتى لو أنه علم ببطلان كلامه لاحقا، فقط لكونه أظهره أمام الناس يخاف التراجع عنه.
❤1👎1🕊1
ما ينوصف المشهد.. شلون بيوم العاشر؟ السلام على المغسل بدم الجراح، السلام على المجرع بكاسات الرماح، السلام على المضام المستباح، السلام على المنحور في الورى، السلام على من دفنه أهل القرى، السلام على المقطوع الوتين، السلام على المحامي بلا معين، السلام على الشيب الخضيب، السلام على الخد التريب، السلام على البدن السليب، السلام على الثغر المقروع بالقضيب، السلام على الرأس المرفوع..
😢2🕊1
وثائق pinned «https://t.me/cvxuqr قناة فيها من درر آل محمد (صلوات الله عليهم) ومن لطائف العلم ما ينفعكم في الدنيا والآخرة.. القناة بإدارة فيليكس ومحسن (زادهما الله علماً ورفعةً وفضلاً)»
https://t.me/cvxuqr قناة فيها من درر آل محمد (صلوات الله عليهم) ومن لطائف العلم ما ينفعكم في الدنيا والآخرة.. القناة بإدارة فيليكس ومحسن (زادهما الله علماً ورفعةً وفضلاً)
❤2🕊1
🔸 عِظَمُ خطر علم الرجال وشأنِه يقول السيد أبو القاسم الخوئي (رحمة الله عليه) في تقريظه لكتاب «ثقات الرواة» لتلميذه السيد حسن الموسوي الإصفهاني: إن علمَ الرجال من أخطر العلوم الإسلامية التي اهتمَّ بها علماء المسلمين وركّزوا عليه في مختلف عصورهم وأدوارهم؛ حرصًا منهم على سلامة دينهم من الدس والكذب، وصيانة شريعتهم من الوضع والاختلاق. وقد ركنوا إليه في أحكام الشريعة باعتباره معيارًا يتميَّز به الضعيف والقوي من الأحادي…
❤2🕊1
يُعد كتاب (معجم رجال الحديث) هو الأكمل في الزمن الحاضر، وذلك بفضل جامعيّته واشتماله على أكثر الخصائص المتقدمة، بحيث يتمكن الباحث بالرجوع إليه من تحقيق أحوال رواة الكتب الأربعة وأسانيدها؛ نعم، قد يجد غير المطّلع على علم الرجال صعوبة في التعاطي معه؛ وذلك لكتابته بلغة تخصصية. - الاستناد في معرفة رجال الأسناد (مركز الإمام محمد الباقر الفقهي) : ج١ - ص١٨.
للسيد الخوئي فضل على الحوزة العلمية إلى يوم القيامة 🎙️ سماحة آية الله الشيخ هادي آل راضي دامت بركاته #الخوئي #آل_راضي
❤1
🔸شهادة أحد ثقات محدثي الشيعة في القرن الثاني الهجري على وفرة الحديث المسطور عن آل الرسول ﷺ: ▪️قال أبو جعفر محمد بن يعقوب الكليني (تـ٣٢٩هـ) في الكافي (ج١، صـ١٤٤): "علي بن إبراهيم، عن محمد بن عيسى بن عبيد، عن يونس بن عبد الرحمن، عن سماعة بن مهران، عن أبي الحسن موسى (عليه السلام)، قال: قلت: أصلحك الله، إنا نجتمع، فنتذاكر ما عندنا، فلا يرد علينا شيء إلا وعندنا فيه شيء مُسَطَّر، وذلك مما أنعم الله به علينا بكم، ثم يرد عل…
❤2
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ibvnrsgnc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 816,541 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وثائق” (@ibvnrsgnc), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibvnrsgnc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.