Channel
@hleoann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
853subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002463299791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hleoann |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hleoann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 853 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 853 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,336 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Reverse 첫 카드깡 Reverse에서 거의 50% 확률로 스톰 에메랄다를 뽑을 수 있는 이벤트 하길래 200불넣고 시도해봄. 모나드 네트워크라서 트젝 빠를거라 생각했는데 트젝 하나 넣을 때마다 50초씩 걸림;; 총 6번 뽑기 했는데 되팔고 다시 뽑고 하는데 거의 30분 걸린거같음;; 겁나 욕하면서 마지막 깡 했는데 1등상품 나와버리는걸 보면 리버스는 마조히스트다.
❤1
대장은 간다했다
실제로 벌어졌습니다. 로빈후드 캐시캣 상장.. ROBINHOOD: New Listing: CASHCAT
2026년 8월 3일 부동산 세법개정안 부동산 보유 및 차익거래에 대한 세금을 대폭 인상됐다고 합니다. 주식 말아먹어 코인도 훼방 놔 부동산은 또 보유도 못하게해 어쩌라는거지? https://youtu.be/mFxq4qnBh7E?si=X3A_SR_CWx6LD2hj
가상자산 과세 유예 청원 링크
GMc모닝 맥날에서 네이버페이로 1만원 이상 결제 시, 이벤트 기간 내 인당 최대 5만 네이버포인트까지 적립 기간: 8월 1일~ 8월31일 이번달은 맥날데이로 지정해야겠네
❤1
님들 그거 아시나요? 🟠인스타 릴스 볼 때 화면 확대 했다가 줄이면 영상만 깔끔하게 시청할 수 있음 🟠유튜브 숏츠 볼 때 화면 꾹 누르고 메뉴 숨기기 누르면 영상만 깔끔하게 시청할 수 있음
움직이지 마세요. 그래요 당신 말이에요.
염병하네
😱1
1. 토큰 스왑을 매도처리하고 스테이블코인끼리 스왑해도 22% 떼가고 이런건 다른 국가들도 하고있으니까 납득은 됩니다. 모든 과정에서 발생하는 수익에 대해 22% 세금을 떼겠다는 의지로 해석하면 되니까 뭐.. 2. 해외거래소와의 손익통산은 자진신고시 근거자료 제출하면 받아줄 것 같습니다. 자동 수집까지 바라기도 어려울듯.. 제일 우려스러운건 크립토에 상대적으로 익숙한 텔레그램 커뮤니티에서조차 이건 어떻게 처리되는거냐는 질문이 마구 나오는데 아직 명확하게 제시된 기준이 하나도 없다는 것. 자진신고 기반으로 운영해보고, 필요시 보완하겠다는데 결국 보완에 이르기까지는 수많은 코인러들의 행정처리 과정에서의 불편과 언제 올지 모르는 국세청으로부터의 호출에 대한 불안이 발생할 수 밖에 없음. 소수 납세자를 대상으로 납세 예정 금액이라도 산정해서 …
🚨 2027년부터 코인 수익에 세금 22% ① 매매·대여 수익 과세 - 2027년 1월 1일 이후 발생한 가상자산 수익부터 적용 - 연간 순이익에서 250만원 공제 - 초과분에 22% 과세 (소득세 20%＋지방소득세 2%) - 첫 신고는 2028년 5월 ② 코인끼리 교환해도 과세 - BTC→ETH, USDT→알트코인 같은 교환도 매도로 간주 - 원화로 출금하지 않아도 교환 시점의 원화가치로 수익 계산 ③ 기존 보유자는 2026년 말 가격이 중요 - 2027년 이전부터 보유한 코인의 취득가격은 실제 매수가와 2026년 12월 31일 시가 중 높은 금액 적용 - 따라서 2026년 말까지 오른 가격은 상당 부분 과세 대상에서 제외되는 구조 예시: 2027년 순이익 1,000만원이면 1,000만원－250만원에 22% 적용 → 세금 16…
📊 2026년 에어드롭 규모 TOP 프로젝트 2026년 에어드롭 규모를 보면 상위권에서 Perp DEX 프로젝트들의 존재감이 두드러졌습니다. 1️⃣ Sentient, $133M으로 1위 2️⃣ EdgeX·KAIO·Backpack 등 대형 에드 프로젝트 다수 포함 3️⃣ Tria $11.8M·GRVT $4.6M·Pharos $2.1M으로 순위권 ✍️퍼프덱스는 쓴 돈을 돌려받는 느낌이라 순수 에드라고 보긴 애매하네요. 하반기에는 프로젝트들이 합리적으로 토큰 좀 나눠줬으면!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hleoann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 640,937 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Based로 졸업하고 싶은 Leo” (@hleoann), 853 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hleoann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.