Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تفقه در بازبینی حجاب و احکام زنان

@hijabandtruth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

310subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001288715554
TypeChannel
Username@hijabandtruth
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hijabandtruth

Growth

3083103096 August 2026 — 308 subscribers6 August 2026 — 308 subscribers7 August 2026 — 309 subscribers13 August 2026 — 310 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 308–310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:26310+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:03309+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:31308no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:06308first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC311 viewsread 6 August 2026

🚨 هشدار : در این کانال ، «دین» نقد نمی‌شود بلکه «برداشت های غلط از دین» نقد می‌شود ❌ ما در این کانال سعی داریم با زدودنِ غبارِ فتواها و نظراتِ منسوبینِ به دین، چهره حقیقی اسلام و هدف اصلی دین که رسیدن انسان به کمالِ اخلاق بوده را نشان دهیم. شیخ بهایی(ره) می‌گوید: آبادی میخانه ز ویرانی ماست جمعیت کفر از پریشانی ماست اسلام به ذات خود ندارد عیبی هر عیب که هست از مسلمانی ماست - هرگونه سواستفاده و بیان ناقص یا با غرض ا

6 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC333 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔸 شهید مرتضی مطهری : "روحانیّت شیعه، از عقل و قرآن وحشت دارد!" "هر ملتی روحیه مخصوصی پیدا می کند. فعلاً در جامعه شیعه مذهب ما، به علل و جهاتی این روحیه پیدا شده که از دو چیز وحشت دارند و میل ندارند به آن دو تا نزدیک شوند و آنها را باز کنند: یکی عقل است، و دیگری قرآن. روحانیت شیعه فعلاً در حالی است که از این دو وحشت دارد!" یادداشت های استاد مطهری، ج ۱۳، ص ۲۵۲ 🛑 @hijabandtruth

5 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC296 viewsread 6 August 2026

مبارزه‌ی زنان هرات برای آزادی 🛑 @hijabandtruth

1 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC333 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @peacetheology

#الهیات_صلح #عدالت #جنسیت از نظر فارابی، زن و مرد قوه متخیله و قوه ناطقه یکسان دارند‏(فارابی، 1995ب‌، ص 95). از طرفی برای انسانِ کامل شدن، باید با قوه متخیله به منبع وحی متصل شد. پس زنان نیز امکان و قوۀ دریافت وحی و انسان کامل شدن را دارند. از طرفی رئیس مدینه فاضله باید انسان کامل باشد. پس زنان نیز می توانند رئیس مدینه فاضله باشند. این قوا در زنان و مردان به طور یکسان وجود دارد ولی به فعلیت رسیدن این قوا ممکن است در

28 Jun 2026, 11:22 UTC405 viewsread 6 August 2026

♦️حمایت بی بدلیل امام سجاد علیه السلام از زنانی که بعد از واقعه حرّه همسران و خانه خود را از دست دادند زمخشری از علمای اهل سنت می‌نویسد: زمانیکه یزید بن معاويه، مسلم بن عقبه را فرمان داد تا اهل مدینه را قلع و قمع کند و پس از آن که مدینه ویران شد، علی بن الحسین علیهماالسّلام سرپرستی ۴۰۰ زن بی‌سرپرست و بی‌خانمان را عهده‌دار شد و به آنها در خانه‌هایش پناه داد. یکی از آن زن‌ها می‌گفت: «به خدا، زندگی‌ای که در خانه این

26 Jun 2026, 09:22 UTC377 viewsread 6 August 2026

مطلبی بسیار جالب از رساله براخوت (یهودیان ارتودکس/افراطی) در این خصوص بزودی قرار داده می‌شود❗️ لطفا کانال را به دوستداران فقه معرفی بفرمایید 🙏

16 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC479 viewsread 6 August 2026
File

👆🏻حجاب، واجب دینی یا شعار سیاسی؟ مروری بر کتاب «حقیقة الحجاب و حجیة الحدیث» اثر محمد سعید عشماوی 🛑 @hijabandtruth

16 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTC490 viewsread 6 August 2026

👆🏻عشماوی در نخستین مقالۀ بخش اولِ کتاب باعنوان «حجاب در اسلام»، با تشریح آیات قرآن و احادیث پیامبر دربارۀ حجاب، نظریۀ اصلی خود را در این باب مطرح می‌کند و می‌نویسد «حجاب شعاری سیاسی است» سه آیۀ قرآن از نگاه او محل بحث‌اند: آیۀ حجاب (احزاب: ۵۳)، آیۀ خِمار (نور: ۳۱) و آیۀ جَلابیب (احزاب: ۵۹). او معتقد است مخاطبان آیۀ حجاب فقط همسران پیامبرند. مطابق روایات سبب نزول، این آیه ضمن اینکه آداب مهمانی در منزل رسول خدا را بیا

16 Jun 2026, 10:29 UTC324 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔺حجاب، واجب دینی یا شعار سیاسی؟ مروری بر کتاب «حقیقة الحجاب و حجیة الحدیث» اثر محمد سعید عشماوی 🛑 @hijabandtruth

14 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC416 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🔷 برای کسانی که بخاطر حجم زیاد صفحات، مطالعه کتاب حجاب شرعی در عصر پیامبر ( از امیرحسین ترکاشوند ) را به تعویق انداختند، دیدن خلاصه کتاب به کوشش حسین شاهمرادی توصیه می‌شود. لینک یوتیوب 🛑 @hijabandtruth

11 Jun 2026, 12:47 UTC395 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Pejman_Ghasemi

⚛️ نکاتی انتقادی در باب تفسیر و تاریخ قرآن ✍️پژمان قاسمی 1️⃣ تفسیر قرآن پیشینه‌ای طولانی دارد که به اوایل دوره‌ی تدوینِ متن قرآنی، پس از رحلت پیامبر اسلام بازمی‌گردد. این امر گویای آن است که ایشان هیچ آیه‌ای از قرآن را تفسیر نکردند؛ یا دقیق‌تر بگویم، در عصر ایشان هیچ آیه‌ای مبهم نبود تا نیازمند تفسیر باشد. این دیدگاهی جدید نیست؛ چنان‌که میرزای قمی نیز نیازمندیِ قرآن به تفسیرِ پیامبر را یاوه‌گویی دانسته است. 2️⃣ آ

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @hijabandtruth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jun 2026, 13:17 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

✅به نظر شما، آیا حجاب در جهت ترویج حیا و عفت توصیه شده است؟ (پاسخ به این سوال بزودی قرارداده می‌شود) لطفا نظرسنجی را برای دیگران هم ارسال کنید 🛑 @hijabandtruth

  1. بله55%
  2. خیر45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 6 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,038,903 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تفقه در بازبینی حجاب و احکام زنان” (@hijabandtruth), 310 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hijabandtruth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.