Channel
@hersantite
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,989subscribers
+62 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003323540418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hersantite |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hersantite |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 3,989 | +42 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 3,947 | +19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 3,928 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 3,927 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 33,431 |
| Reactions total | 3,119 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,344 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 2,344 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
James Mason reads and comments on an article about the White Australia Party’s legal arguments in the High Court of Australia. You don’t even need ElevenLabs to have AI James Mason read out articles; the real James Mason does it for free.
⚡76
Public servants should be punished severely when they break the law
⚡108
So I just checked out the official Australian citizenship practice test. According to this, "free speech underpins Australia's democratic system." Would our elected officials pass this test?
⚡142
Challenging a law that criminalises our association and advocacy with 15-year-long jail sentences is hardly an exercise in attention-seeking. Liberals, even when they’re on the right side of the battle, feel the need to cuck in some of the most pointless and bizarre ways.
⚡152
Australia's leading free speech advocacy group has applied to make submissions during the White Australia Party's upcoming High Court challenge to the government's prohibited hate group laws. The Free Speech Union said the Constitution needed to protect all Australians, regardless of what political movement they belonged to. "The next censored views might be yours" https://www.noticer.news/free-speech-group-interv…
⚡100
The government would prefer nationalist terrorism rather than work with nationalists to prevent it
⚡149
Australian nationalist Michael Nelson has been jailed for 21 days after being convicted of "offensive behaviour" for wearing a meme T-shirt and performing a Nazi salute in Melbourne's CBD, even though the gesture was legal at the time. Fellow activist Nathan Bull was also convicted but had his sentencing adjourned until September. https://www.noticer.news/michael-nelson-jailed-salute-shirt-melbourne/ Follow: @Noti…
⚡127
They will tell you that what you believe is a “load of lies” but will never enumerate any of the lies you are alleged to have told. This sellout can only point to the fact that we think we are “the good guys”. How exactly is that a lie? Just like every other political ideology, Fascists genuinely believe we are the good guys. I would like to hear how they – who are probably moral subjectivists anyway – can explain h…
⚡126
Hi I'm Yan Zakharin, 21 years old, Ukrainian refugee who came here when I was only 17 due to having relatives in Australia who invited me to come here because of the war in Ukraine. When I came here I was living regular life, working and exploring nature with friends. Eventually I was looking for real brotherhood and the answer was always in front of me, but in a back of my head I was afraid of getting deported. And…
⚡170
Every belief system and its adherents can be considered a cult
⚡124
The Noticer has been banned from X, not because our content broke the rules, but because Jewish lobby groups claim the name of our news site is "hateful". This is an attack on free speech and independent journalism, but it's bigger than us - the right needs to unite and fight for free speech and against online censorship while we still can. This article explains what happened, and addresses claims made about us by …
⚡118
Internal enemies should be dealt with gently and external enemies harshly
⚡132
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @hersantite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 18,269 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hersantite” (@hersantite), 3,989 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hersantite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.