Yes, this means the Liberal-Nationals Coalition allowed this to become law via abstaining.
💯54🌚25🤯13😈8🤨2👻1🔥1🤣1

Channel
@ausvstheagenda
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,846subscribers
-123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001156025596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ausvstheagenda |
| Created | 25 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ausvstheagenda |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 8,846 | -19 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 8,865 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 8,873 | +4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 8,869 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:48 | 8,879 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 8,887 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 8,897 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 8,905 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 8,923 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 8,928 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 8,941 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 8,955 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 8,969 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 8,971 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 8,969 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 8,969 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,296 reactions across 27 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 1,706 | 39.7% | |
| 🤯 | 398 | 9.26% | |
| 😈 | 303 | 7.05% | |
| 🌚 | 271 | 6.31% | |
| 💯 | 256 | 5.96% | |
| 👏 | 211 | 4.91% | |
| 🤔 | 120 | 2.79% | |
| 🎉 | 114 | 2.65% | |
| 😁 | 107 | 2.49% | |
| 🙏 | 104 | 2.42% | |
| 🍌 | 93 | 2.16% | |
| 💅 | 76 | 1.77% | |
| 😢 | 58 | 1.35% | |
| 🌭 | 57 | 1.33% | |
| ❤ | 56 | 1.30% | |
| 👍 | 47 | 1.09% | |
| 🍾 | 33 | 0.768% | |
| 😴 | 33 | 0.768% | |
| 👻 | 26 | 0.605% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 0.512% | |
| 25 further kinds | 205 | 4.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,337 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Yes, this means the Liberal-Nationals Coalition allowed this to become law via abstaining.
💯54🌚25🤯13😈8🤨2👻1🔥1🤣1
One Nation’s attempt to remove ASIO’s power to question people for the “promotion of communal violence” failed. The Greens and David Pocock voted against expanding questioning powers to cover serious threats from radical Islamic extremism. Liberal Senators Jonathon Duniam and Maria Kovacic supported elements of the bill alongside Labor. In March 2003, then-Labor frontbencher Anthony Albanese fiercely opposed Howar…
🌚33😈28🤯11🥰3❤2🕊1🤓1
🚨BREAKING: Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2.0 has passed in the Senate and will now become law. 26 YES, 15 NO. Liberal Senator Alex Antic was the only Coalition member to speak against the bill. The Greens and One Nation also opposed it, with Malcolm Roberts speaking against the bill. David Pocock also voted NO. Only Labor voted for the bill. Continued…
🤯37😈31👍4🥰3❤2🙏2✍1👨💻1
There are 12 amendment sheets on this bill. In summary: The Coalition filed nothing. Not one amendment. On a bill expanding ASIO’s interrogation powers, the opposition asked for zero changes. Labor reached a deal with the Liberal Party earlier this year to pass the legislation, agreeing to reinstate the sunset clause until mid-2029. One Nation wants to add “serious threats from radical Islamic extremism” as a bra…
🙏70👍12❤10🤯9✍1🤓1
Tomorrow is the day the Albanese Government and the Coalition team up to make ASIO’s compulsory questioning powers permanent. “Debate” starts at 12.15pm at the latest, and at 1.15pm there’s a hard deadline to vote on the entirety of the legislation. ASIO will be able to compel you to turn up and answer questions. There is no right to silence. Refuse to answer, and it’s 5 years jail. Tell anyone it’s happening, and…
🤯38👀10😈7😨3❤1👌1👾1🔥1
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says “multicultural Australia is the only Australia that has ever existed” while accusing Pauline Hanson of making Australia weaker by trying to create division in society.
🤣121🍌29😈16🙈11🦄6🙉5🤨4🌚3
🚨BREAKING: Jacinta Allan has announced her retirement from politics.
👏93🤣44🍾13😁5❤4🍌3💅2
Not a single one of these kids actually knows why they’re protesting.
💯85🤣80👀6💅4🌭3🤯3😨2❤1
The ABC is openly targeting Australian right-wing content creators - publishing an article naming @auspill, March for Australia, @NoticerNews and others while pushing to have their accounts demonetised and removed from the platform. This isn't the first time. The ABC came after me in 2021 for the same thing after I began outperforming them across social media. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-06/ragebait-how-fa…
👏30🤔18😈12👍11⚡4🔥2🫡2❤1
Just seen that @NoticerNews has been banned on X, which is ridiculous. But what pisses me off is that ECAJ had the audacity to claim it was false that they were involved in drafting the hate speech laws, despite AG Michelle Rowland saying powerful Jewish lobby groups would be consulted on the “structuring” of the laws, while ECAJ Co-Executive Peter Wertheim gave evidence during the two-day PJCIS hearing before the l…
💯96👍6❤4⚡3🤔3
Victorian Premier Ben Carroll says “I am not Daniel Andrews, I am not Jacinta Allan” and promises to do things differently. Carroll served as Jacinta Allan’s deputy and held several ministerial roles under the Andrews Government.
🤣129😴27😈15💅9🤔5😁4❤3🍌3
🚨BREAKING: Jacinta Allan has announced her resignation as Victorian Premier.
🎉114🍾18👏17😈7😐6🤔5🔥3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ausvstheagenda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anthony Khallouf @ausvstheagenda” (@ausvstheagenda), 8,846 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ausvstheagenda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.