Channel
@tomsewelluncensored
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,904subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002393152277 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tomsewelluncensored |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tomsewelluncensored |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 10,904 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 10,909 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 10,911 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 10,914 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 10,911 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 10,913 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 10,915 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 10,913 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 10,911 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 10,907 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 10,906 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 10,906 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (22 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 195,010 |
| Reactions total | 13,947 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,300 reactions across 34 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 11,300 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,947reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Commonwealth prosecutors are quoting a Stalinist secret police functionary as an authority for why the Australian Constitution doesn’t apply to racists. During the period wherein he was working for the secret police, called the Great Purge by historians, 800,000 people were executed or worked to death in harsh labour camps called Gulags. https://t.me/TheAustralianVanguard/625
🫡170
“End immigration before it ends us.” | ✋ NC | 🇳🇿 WNZ |
🫡346
There is an ideal metaphysical and moral system in the cosmos, which Fascists should try to discover and accord with
🫡281
🚨 BREAKING Last night, we were fortunate enough to spend five minutes with Yan Zakharin as he spoke candidly about his deportation back to Ukraine. Yan appeared to be in good spirits and remained optimistic about his prospects in Ukraine, despite the current climate and the uncertainty surrounding his future. He has spent almost eight months in detention following his arrest over an allegation that he threw a stic…
🫡294
Jewish lobbyists such as David Ossip from the Jewish Board of Deputies, spent most of last week complaining to the Royal Commission that protests were “antisemitic” and somehow endangering Jews. In this clip, the Counsel for the Royal Commission describes how the phrase "Abolish the Jewish Lobby" invoked an antisemitic trope, and was interpreted by Jews to mean the abolishment of Jews, and how the "neat lines of Whi…
🫡347
We are back on X, but now under attack on Meta, please follow us on all of our platforms, including Gab, where we are going to start posting more regularly, in case the bans worsen. We should have been using it all along to reward Andrew Torba for creating an actual free speech platform, instead of a fake one like X. Full info in this thread: https://x.com/NoticerNews/status/2086659355747967138 Gab: https://gab.com…
🫡236
Jew Josh Frydenberg is not satisfied with only the banning of White Australia and Hizb ut-Tahir, but wants to see other groups and organisations banned as well. They will never be satisfied until even the most vaguely patriotic organisations are banned. They want to eventually use this legislation to ban their entire nationalistic political opposition.
🫡348
Patriotic Aussies are planning nationwide protests against the government's "hate speech" laws, banning of rival political parties and online censorship.. "Free speech is under attack" https://www.noticer.news/patriots-holding-free-speech-rallies-australia/ Follow: @NoticerNews
🫡278
The traitorous Labor government and their uniparty colleagues have launched an unprecedented assault on freedom of speech, they can't beat us in the free marketplace of ideas so they've moved to criminalise patriotic dissent in a desperate bid to hold onto power. Patriots must assemble in every city across Australia on August 30 to once again March For Australia, we must take a stand for free speech and push for our…
🫡319
Freedom of speech is under attack in Australia. Over recent years, state and federal governments have introduced an unprecedented wave of laws restricting speech, political expression and association. At the same time, Australians are demanding change. Immigration has reached historic levels. Housing and the cost of living have spiralled out of control. Trust in our institutions is declining. On issue after issue,…
🫡254
August 30th could be our last chance. Tell your mates 🇦🇺
🫡320
In Australia, all men are equal, but some are more equal than others. Here are the most equal groups in Australia according to government policy: 1. [redacted to shield the author from criminal liability] 2. Home invaders 3. Foreign rapists https://t.me/NoticerNews/3897
🫡228
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @tomsewelluncensored. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 25,717 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tom Sewell” (@tomsewelluncensored), 10,904 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomsewelluncensored.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.