4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103–165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 10:35
158
+47
9 Aug 2026, 06:48
111
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:01
111
+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:51
110
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
76.6%
avg views ÷ 158 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
20 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
2,419
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
34
39.1%
👏
18
20.7%
💯
11
12.6%
🤣
9
10.3%
😁
6
6.90%
❤
4
4.60%
🔥
4
4.60%
🤬
1
1.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
In Australia, all men are equal, but some are more equal than others.
Here are the most equal groups in Australia according to government policy:
1. [redacted to shield the author from criminal liability]
2. Home invaders
3. Foreign rapists
https://t.me/NoticerNews/3897
📢 🇦🇹 ⚖️ Martin Sellner on X: In 2018, the Identitarian Movement was almost as strong as we are today.
Then they shut down all our social media accounts.
Then they closed all our bank accounts.
Then they carried out dozens of house raids and started a huge trial in Austria, destroying our entire infrastructure, accusing us of forming a "criminal organization." We were acquitted.
Then they launched another wave of …
Two young patriotic activists have altered a number of far-left "Aussie" posters in Brisbane to say "Indian" and "Chinese" instead.
https://www.noticer.news/patriots-change-aussie-posters-brisbane/
Follow: @NoticerNews
The issue is not that she has been charged, it is:
a) she has been refused bail when the primary reason for keeping someone in jail before a trial is risk of reoffending and there is next to no risk of reoffending.
b) the double standards applied to criminals who initate violent crimes who regularly receive bail vs someone taking the law into their own hands to combat crime
c) the system can only justify punishing vi…
An Aussie woman has been refused bail after she allegedly bashed a home invader with a baseball bat, chained him up by the neck, and forced him to take her to a local park to find stolen goods.
https://www.noticer.news/raymond-terrace-female-vigilante-bashes-chains-intruder/
Follow: @NoticerNews
To add this too, as we've wrote about this several times. Our primary enemy isn't the Far Left. It isn't migrants. It isn't even the jews. Not that they aren't enemies of course.
It's the system itself that's the primary enemy. All others are mere symptoms. Once you replace the primary, the secondary will shrivel away into dust.
https://t.me/totallyawesomefriends
In case you missed it.
X article from earlier in the week that summarises all the constitutional arguments put forth by the White Australia Party’s lawyers, and the attempted replies from the Commonwealth.
Share with friends and family so they understand the case and the legal arguments.
Read time: 6 - 8 minutes.
You can read it without leaving telegram at the link below.
https://hitlerx.com/LonePatriot14/status…
A more concise summary of the Government's arguments:
1) it was wrong to ban the Communist Party in 1950 because Jews were the founders of Communism and the primary ethnic group responsible for its spread.
2) the former NSN members should be banned from all forms of political and social activity because they were critical of Jewish political groups.
3) the Australian constitution should be subservient to the will of…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stephenwellsaus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 235,254 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stephen Wells” (@stephenwellsaus), 158 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stephenwellsaus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.