Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nationalist Service Foundation (NSF)

@NSF_Aus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

171subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001503653257
TypeChannel
Username@NSF_Aus
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NSF_Aus

Growth

1719 Aug 2026, 05:16 — 171 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 09:53 — 171 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:169 Aug 2026, 09:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170–172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 09:53171no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:16171first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 171 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.0
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (22 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total480
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 47s
Average length
2m 47s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1144.0%
👍520.0%
🤬416.0%
28.00%
🔥28.00%
14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Individuals who dream of a better future - of surpassing the current systemic downward spiral - aspire to freedom. Those who have translated their will into actions and into reality are those who live in freedom, beyond the golden chains. The thing we need to understand is, not all can be so lucky as to dream, and even fewer can be called upon by higher powers to act for our race and kin. However; for those of us

🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Those who adhere to state mandates are natural slaves. Think back - regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for themselves and their children: were they truly acting in freedom and informed consent, or were they constrained by a fear of existing outside the safety net into which the system has effectively confined them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_slavery

💯3

3 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC26 viewsread 9 August 2026

Trump and Netanyahu invade Spanish North Africa using pet, Morocco. 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇲🇦❌🇪🇸 You think that Morocco randomly enabled >60,000 plus Moroccans to siege and storm Spain's territory in North Africa (Ceuta)? Impossible. >60,000 military aged men did not suddenly just co-ordinate to invade Spain on a whim. What's more, as soon as the 'Gates of Toledo' were opened, these men immediately started a crime spree of breaking a

3 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC4 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NoticerNewsPhoto

We have been banned from X for the above reasons but are appealing, thanks for all the support. We get notifications for DMs still, but can't read or open them. It's interesting that last week the Executive Council of Australian Jewry attacked us in a submission to a parliamentary committee (their accusations are false and we were in the middle of responding when we got banned), and then today ECAJ co-CEO Alex Ryvc

🤬4

2 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

To all young men trying to find their own career path - a follow up, look at the industries untouched by AI : - Construction - Installation and Repair - Agriculture - Grounds Maintenance Focus on real jobs, not computer laptop jobs that can easily be automated and have been created as a result of the financialisation of our economy. Better yet, combine your irreplaceable job with a useful school of knowledge - suc

29 Jul 2026, 01:27 UTC37 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WhiteAusZoomer

What we've seen coming out of Victoria ever since the murmurs of Jactina's exit and resignation has been nothing short of laughable. The Witch, having left, has the new Labor leader, as many have now pointed out, emphatically attempting to distance himself from the Party's previous two Premiers and past twelve years of governance. I generally post a lot of low-effort, entertainment oriented content for quick consump

👍3

29 Jul 2026, 01:19 UTC19 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tomsewelluncensoredVideo

Lina Seiche on Anarcho-Tyranny

2👍1

29 Jul 2026, 01:19 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026

"And it is a mark of a tyrant to have men of foreign extraction rather than citizens as guests at table and companions, feeling that citizens are hostile but strangers make no claim against him." - Aristotle

28 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026

It does not matter whether it's Andrews, Allan or this soy boy, Carroll. All major parties (be it the Liberals, Labor or Greens) are driving at different speeds to the same destination. 🚗 🧭 Their destination is off the edge of a demographic cliff. Our democracy™️ is fake, and it is gay. The destination will not change unless a truly Nationalist force takes power in Australia and the States that make it up.

28 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC20 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hersantite

The Labor Party is so despised in Victoria that its new leader feels the need to effectively disavow the last 12 years of its governance. Is there anyone left who’s still stupid enough to fall for such cynical pandering? https://t.me/ausvstheagenda/3956

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @NSF_Aus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 843,979 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nationalist Service Foundation (NSF)” (@NSF_Aus), 171 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NSF_Aus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.