﷽ حامی هیچ فرقه ، گروه ، حزب و شخصی نیستیم جز آل محمد علیهم السلام
✨قَالَ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَ آلِه: أَفْضَلُ جِهَادِ أُمَّتِي انْتِظَارُ الْفَرَجِ
📚تحف العقول ص۳۷
پشتیبان کانال
@eteqadate_shie_2
📚کتابخانه حضرت ولیعصر: @vali_e_asr
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +433. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,007–6,570 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 04:20
6,505
+13
2 Nov 2026, 23:47
6,492
+10
31 Oct 2026, 07:30
6,482
+12
28 Oct 2026, 11:27
6,470
+17
25 Oct 2026, 05:38
6,453
+6
22 Oct 2026, 02:29
6,447
+18
18 Oct 2026, 21:36
6,429
+10
15 Oct 2026, 17:19
6,419
+22
12 Oct 2026, 11:38
6,397
+27
5 Oct 2026, 12:54
6,370
+36
27 Sept 2026, 15:00
6,334
+53
15 Sept 2026, 23:18
6,281
+13
11 Sept 2026, 22:19
6,268
+12
7 Sept 2026, 20:02
6,256
+34
2 Sept 2026, 11:57
6,222
+16
30 Aug 2026, 11:54
6,206
+10
27 Aug 2026, 19:14
6,196
+4
25 Aug 2026, 04:32
6,192
+2
22 Aug 2026, 09:23
6,190
+16
19 Aug 2026, 04:02
6,174
first reading
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 6,505 subscribers
Avg views / post
707
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
84 (8 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
23,336
Reactions total
515
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,900
Videos
≈243
Links
≈2,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,384 reactions across 84 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
894
64.6%
😭
237
17.1%
❤🔥
103
7.44%
🔥
42
3.03%
👍
28
2.02%
👌
22
1.59%
💯
21
1.52%
💔
14
1.01%
🕊
7
0.506%
👏
3
0.217%
😢
3
0.217%
⚡
2
0.145%
🏆
2
0.145%
🤩
2
0.145%
🫡
2
0.145%
😍
1
0.072%
🙏
1
0.072%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,384 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (6.06%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔹بیزاری جستن از اولی و دومی، وظیفه موجودات خارج از گنبد ( ۱ )
✍🏻عجلان ابى صالح گويد: مردى خدمت امام صادق عليه السلام شرفياب شد و بدان حضرت عرضكرد قربانت اين گنبد آدم عليه السّلام است؟ فرمود: آرى، و خداى عز و جل را گنبدهاى بسيارى است.
و بدان كه براستى در پس اين مغرب شما سیونُه (۳۹) مغرب ديگر است، سرزمينهاى سپیدی که پر است از مخلوقات خدا و همگى از نور آن استفاده میكنند و چشم بر همزدنى هم نافرمانى خدا را نمیكنند،…
🔺اگر حضرت فاطمه سلام الله علیها نفرین میکرد چه میشد؟! ( ۲ )
✍🏽ابو هاشم گويد: هنگامى كه على عليه السلام را (از خانه) بيرون بردند حضرت فاطمه عليها السلام نيز به دنبال آن حضرت بيرون آمد در حالى كه پيراهن رسول خدا (صلی الله علیه وآله) را روى سرش گذارده بود و دست حسن و حسين عليهما السلام را بدست گرفته بود و میفرمود:
▪️مرا با تو چه كار اى ابا بكر؟ میخواهى بچههايم را يتيم كنى و مرا بیشوهر كنى؟ بخدا سوگند اگر كار …
🗡 چرا با شمشیر از حق خود دفاع نکردی؟!
✍🏼 از اسحاق بن موسى از پدرش امام كاظم و او از امام صادق به واسطه پدران گرامش عليهمالسّلام نقل است كه اميرالمؤمنين عليهالسّلام در كوفه مشغول ايراد خطبهاى بود كه در آخر آن فرمود:
بدانيد كه من از مردم به خود مردم اولويّت دارم، و من از آن روز كه رسول خدا صلى الله عليه و آله وفات يافت پيوسته مورد ظلم واقع شدهام.!
پس اشعث بن قيس -ملعون- برخاسته و گفت: اى اميرالمؤمنين از وقتى …
✍🏼اگر نبود عهدی که پیامبر با من نموده است، میدانستی که تو نمیتوانی به خانۀ من داخل شوی..!!
💔پس از به آتش کشیدن درب خانه وحی وقتی حرامیان سقیفه داخل خانه مولا شدند...، امیرالمؤمنین علیهالسلام ناگهان از جا برخاست و گریبان عمر -حرام زاده- را گرفت و او را به شدت کشید و بر زمین کوبید و بر بینی و گردنش ضربه زد و خواست که او را بکشد. ولی سخن رسول خدا صلی الله علیه و آله و وصیتش را که به او کرده بود بیاد آورد و فرمود: ا…
✍️ جنایات مغیرة بن شعبه لعنة الله عليه ، همدست قنفذ ملعون!
▪️امام حسن مجتبی علیه السلام به مغیره بن شعبه ملعون فرمود:
🥀 و امّا تو اى مغيرة بن شعبه ، تو دشمن خداوند متعال و تارک قرآن و تكذيب كننده رسول خدا صلی اللّٰه علیه و آله و سلم هستی!
🔥 تو مرتكب زنا شده و مستوجب حدّ رجم (سنگسار شدن) میباشى ، و بر اين گناهت افرادى عدول صالح پرهيزگار گواهى دادند ، پس رجم تو به تأخير افتاد و حق به باطل دفع ، و راستى به دروغ و …
🦟 ابوبکر، پسر زن مگس خوار در کلام مولانا امیرالمومنین علیه السلام!
✨امیرالمؤمنین علیه السلام به عمر بن صحاک فرمودند:
🔥ای پسر صهاک، آیا ما در خلافت حقی نداریم و خلافت از آن تو و فرزند زن مگس خوار (ابوبکر) است؟!
🌱 فَقَالَ عَلِيٌّ عَلَيْهِ اَلسَّلاَمُ لِعُمَرَ يَا اِبْنَ صُهَاكَ فَلَيْسَ لَنَا فِيهَا حَقٌّ وَ هِيَ لَكَ وَ لاِبْنِ آكِلَةِ اَلذِّبَّانَ؟!
📚كتاب سليم بن قيس الهلالي ، ص ١٦١
✨ امیرالمومنین علیهالسلام در …
💩 نجاست خوری نواصب لعنهم الله در عصر رجعت!
✍️معاوية بن عمار گوید: به امام صادق عرضكردم تفسیر آيه: ﴿فإن له معيشة ضنكا -طه/۱۲۴- ﴾ چيست؟ امام فرمود: بخدا قسم اين آيه در باره نواصب (و دشمنان ما) است عرضكردم: قربانت گردم! ما كه آنها را همواره در ناز و نعمت ديده و میبينيم و بدين گونه هم میميرند.! امام فرمود: بخدا آنها آن زندگى ناراحتكننده و گذران تنگى را هنگام رجعت در پی خواهند داشت كه در آن موقع «نجاست» میخورند.…
🔹قرآن دارای ظاهر و باطن هست و باطنش ظاهر و باطنی دارد، ممکن است هر قسمتی از یک آیه در مورد مسئله خاصی باشد.
❤️امام صادق سلام الله علیه فرمودند: «ای جابر! همانا برای قرآن باطنی است و هر باطنی ظاهری دارد. سپس افزود: ای جابر! هیچ چیزی دورتر از تفسیر قرآن نسبت به عقل و اندیشه مردمان نیست، چه بسا آیهای نازل شده که ابتدایش درباره چیزی، وسطش در مورد چیزی دیگرو پایانش هم چیز دیگری باشد.»
📕تفسیر عیاشی، ج۱، ص۲۲ [ يا جابر إ…
🔺اگر حضرت فاطمه سلام الله علیها نفرین میکرد چه میشد؟! ( ۱ )
▪️ امام صادق علیه السلام به مفضل فرمودند: عمر و قنفذ و خالد بن ولید به درون خانه هجوم آوردند و به صورت دختر پیامبر سیلی زدند😭، تا جایی که گوشوارههایش از زیر معجرش نمایان شد! فاطمه با صدای بلند گریه میکرد و میگفت: ای پدر! ای پیغمبر خدا ! این جماعت دخترت را دروغگو میدانند و میزنند!😭 بچهاش را هم کشتند!😭
▪️سپس امیرالمؤمنین علیه السلام در حالی که چشمش …
▪️جراحات جسمی حضرت صدیقه کبری سلام الله علیها
💔جراحت از ناحیه «ساق دست»:
▪️سپس عُمَر درب خانه را به آتش کشید. تاریانهاش را بلند کرد و با تازيانه طوری به ساق دست آن حضرت زد كه حضرت زهرا علیهاالسلام صيحهای زد و فرمود: يا اَبَتاه یا رسول الله!!
📓کتاب سليم بن قيس، ص۳۸۷
💔 جرات از ناحیه «گوش»:
▪️امام صادق علیه السلام ضمن روایتی در شرح ماجرای کوچه و اخذ سند فدک توسط عُمَر، فرمود:
▪️عمر ملعون با دست به صورت حضرت زه…
😭19❤3🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @eteqadate_shie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@eteqadate_shie edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @eteqadate_shie as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
شیعه پژوهی @negahiinou · 13,128 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
آستان مقدس علوی @imamalinetfa · 39,231 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
️اذکار @owjishirazi · 19,847 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 September 2026
حکیمِ طبِ سُنتی اسلامی @hakimkhirandish · 22,934 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
دروغ ها و خرافات ملحدین @Zandiq_IQ7 · 19,156 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
دفتر آیت الله تبریزیان @DaftareAyatollahTabrizian · 151,431 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
کانال رسمی کربلایی رسول برنا @sher_borna · 22,084 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
کانال رسمی کربلایی جواد مقدم @javadmoghadam_ir · 27,544 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
کانال رسمی حاج حسین سیب سرخی @Maheharaminfo · 41,923 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دفاع از اعتقادات و رد شبهات” (@eteqadate_shie), 6,505 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eteqadate_shie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.