Channel
@jiuzhouxuemengpindao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
200subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004408652998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jiuzhouxuemengpindao |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 18 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 19:58 | 200 | +10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:47 | 190 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:22 | 190 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 September 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 4,970 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 03:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
70 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 34 | 48.6% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 12.9% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 12.9% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
从马驹桥出发：到我们身边的零工市场去！ 为什么在一个号称“世界工厂”的国度里，奉献了整整半生青春的工人，到老还要在清晨的寒风中像牲口一样被工头挑拣？马驹桥那群白发苍苍的日结工，不是镜头下猎奇的谈资，而是我们的父辈母辈、是我们的阶级同胞！在京东、顺丰的物流大仓与黑中介层层抽水的链条背后，是整个官僚垄断资本主义吃人的机器！ 我们不能再困在书斋里背诵理论名词、发几句廉价的叹息了——走出去，到身边最近的零工市场去！去算清工友带血的活命账，在同工友握紧双手的温度中，积蓄埋葬这个旧制度的力量！ 请点击这里阅读。 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
👏3💩2❤1
中专生的实习剥削、集体抗争与基层小组建设 工厂付23元一小时，学生到手14元，剩下9元在结算表上赫然写着："学校利润"。这不是个别班主任糊涂，而是"职校—中介—工厂"的整条利益链。 本文复盘了2023—2026年六起真实的中专生实习抗争：云南百余名学生串联对账，撕穿校企双簧；数百名护理生跨省联合，让"不签就扣毕业证"的威胁彻底失灵；但也有懂法条、握铁证的人，因为一个人单干，被"匿名无法核实"一句话打发。 为什么背熟法条也赢不了，抱成一团却能逼学校让步？怎样防止带头人被收买？怎样把父母变成同盟军？斗争胜利后，怎样不让队伍一哄而散？请点击这里阅读。 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
👍4💩3
https://telegra.ph/从双休购到双休优选劳动者究竟需要什么-10-23 从“双休购”被封，到“只夸双休企业、不碰单休企业”的“双休优选”被有关部门找上门——开发者已经退到了墙角，为什么中帝当局依然容不下一张温和的工时表？周均48.3小时的苦役、几千元的饥饿工资、遍地开花的罢工讨薪背后，无产阶级究竟需要什么？ 欢迎关注我们的频道： https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
💩3❤1👍1
巴尔干的阶级觉醒与街头风暴：当代阿尔巴尼亚各阶层困境、大众抗争与新左翼的崛起 物价是欧洲水平，工资是非洲水平！阿尔巴尼亚旅游爆火、地拉那房价翻倍，连特朗普女婿都来圈海岛，矿工却拿30欧元日薪在地下拼命，老人要在面包和降压药之间二选一。 2024—2026年，40天铜矿大罢工、白发老人围堵总理府、Z世代“火烈鸟革命”燃遍全国！更震撼的是，沉寂30多年的左翼靠十年扎根矿井，硬生生杀进议会。这场撕开“繁荣橱窗”的阶级风暴，到底如何爆发，又将走向何方？ 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
❤4💩3
被剥夺的青春与分流的锁链：中专生的革命宣言 一张中考卷，就把你打成"差生"钉进流水线？别再信"不努力活该"！ 从17:1的摆烂课堂到两班倒的顶岗实习地狱，你的青春如何被明码标价、榨成利润？所谓94%就业率、工匠美梦，不过是资本回收廉价劳动力的骗局。 被分流≠被报废，我们失去的只有锁链！ 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
👏4💩3
中学生怎么在身边开展工作——从毛主席二十八画生交友开始说起 一则征友启事，如何点燃改变中国的星星之火？1915年，长沙一名师范生既无背景，也无资金，更无组织可依靠。他以“二十八画生”的名义发出一则征友启事，后来聚起了蔡和森、何叔衡、郭亮等一批骨干。 他是怎么找到同路人的？怎样把一群热血青年锻造成中坚力量？一个读书会，又怎样一步步成长为改造社会的力量？本文回溯青年毛泽东的早期实践，梳理“公开征友、读书讨论、调查实践、组织升华”的完整路径。 没有背景，也可以从身边做起。你愿意做那个发出第一声“嘤鸣”的人吗？ 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
💩3👍1
起来，不愿做苦役的同学们——评五原一中学生的集体抗争 内蒙古五原一中，一群高二学生在国庆前夕做了件事：他们不再各自忍受，而是把名字签在同一张纸上，向违规补课的校方说"不"。几十个签名，让个人的"厌学情绪"变成了无法歪曲的集体诉求。 但联名之后呢？代表怎么选？家长和老师站哪边？举报到教育局就能解决吗？——如何防止秋后算账，如何把一次性的愤怒变成持久的团结，本文来探讨这些问题。 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
👍4💩3
【网友来稿】谁夺走了高中生的睡眠？——一个高三学生对资产阶级教育制度的阶级控诉 清晨五点四十五分，闹钟如绞刑架，我被撕扯起床，睡眠被制度性偷走：教育部写“睡8小时”，衡水模式却歌颂只睡3-5小时的“光荣”。学生从不是孤立存在的，资本把青少年推进劳动力预加工流水线。 图片链接： https://upload.cc/i1/2026/10/10/OvLywG.jpg 作为一个被碾碎的高三生，我要告诉大家，睡眠剥夺是阶级筛选工具，我们不是人，是待盖印的半成品。重温毛主席“九小时睡眠”令，再看今日虚伪禁令：夺回黑夜，唯有砸碎资产阶级教育机器。 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
💩3
毛主席论考试：打破分数的枷锁，把青春还给青少年 七成中学生睡眠不达标，衡水模式把青少年往死里卷——这不是个别现象，是近一亿青年学生正在亲身经历的。但毛主席早在六十年前就一针见血地指出："现在的考试是用对付敌人的办法，搞突然袭击！"他不仅看穿了应试体制的阶级本质，更旗帜鲜明地喊出"健康第一，学习第二"，鼓励学生向僵化课堂造反。 这篇文章，写给每一个被分数压得喘不过气的青年。 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
💩3🌭1
从法国校门口到中国教室：学生为什么站起来 法国中学生被打瞎眼睛、炸烂手臂，只因校门口要配齐老师、要回午休。而我们每天六点跑操、十点熄灯，连洗澡吃饭都成了奢侈——同一套把人当牲口的教育机器，凭什么我们还在沉默？当学校把资源不足说成“你不够努力”，又把身心透支包装成“吃苦”，谁在为这一切付出代价？ 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
❤3💩3
从山东“三贤电子”学生工停工维权看职校青年斗争的根本出路 一年级就被丢进工厂每天干13小时，想走就被威胁“出去练练”？山东三贤电子的车间里，职校生正沦为当代包身工。 丢掉幻想，组织起来，才有出路！ 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
💩2
高昂起我们的头颅：大中专学生必须投身生产斗争与阶级斗争的大熔炉！ 欢迎关注我们的频道：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组：https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿，投稿邮箱为： [email protected]
💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jiuzhouxuemengpindao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“九洲学盟” (@jiuzhouxuemengpindao), 200 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiuzhouxuemengpindao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.