💎 250 спинов ПРОСТО ЗА СТАРТ! Никакого депозита. Запускаешь бота — получаешь 250 FS на любимые игры.

Channel
Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
@fwalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,969subscribers
-1,215 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001246218756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fwalls |
| Description | Пожалуй, самые трендовые и разнообразные обои на твой Android & Iphone 🍀 Скачивай и устанавливай 🙂 По всем вопросам: @mediagrape, @grapemedia 👨💻Купить/продать канал: @birzha_RO |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fwalls |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 48,969 | -87 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 49,056 | -132 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 49,188 | -207 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 49,395 | -55 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 49,450 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 49,475 | -31 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 49,506 | -52 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 49,558 | -56 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:16 | 49,614 | -34 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 49,648 | -39 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:34 | 49,687 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:03 | 49,710 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 49,730 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 49,742 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 49,762 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 49,763 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 49,779 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 49,788 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 49,831 | -32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 49,863 | first reading |
Engagement
728 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.19%
- avg views ÷ 48,969 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 583
- 360 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 360
- of 728 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 728 (5 August 2026 – 11 October 2026) |
| Views total | 209,882 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Oct 2026, 01:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,020
- Videos
- ≈30
- Links
- ≈5,270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 24m 17s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 79 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
🔞⭐️ ЛУЧШИЕ XXX КАНАЛЫ В TELEGRAM👇🏻 🆘FAKE HUB - https://t.me/+vG9gn9kLJfg4ZmIy 🆘BRAZZERS TG - https://t.me/+4_TrnWDA2-o5MzUy 🆘ОЦЕНИ ЖОПУ - https://t.me/+KasBujHrzWFmZDYy 🆘XHUMSTER - https://t.me/+Dr2lwDxGACcwYjZi ⛔️ПИЗДЮКАМ НЕ ВХОДИТЬ👇🏻
ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
🟥🟥🟥🟥 🏆🏆🏆🎰 💰 Стример закинул 500₽, а вынес 187 496₽ на GETX Здесь самые большие выигрыши, ведь каждый новый игрок получает БОНУС ДО 100 000 ₽ + 250 фриспинов и +350% к депозиту 👉https://lvlx.click/tnyymbw5r 💥Успей ЗАБРАТЬ БОНУС за 24 часа!
Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs
JetTon раздаёт 1 800 000 $ 14.10. Не пропусти.
Showing the 12 most recent of 728 posts we hold for @fwalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fwalls edited 20 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 October 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@SkippNetBot · 43,94613 postsKiss Знакомства | Общение
@kiss_datingbot · 128,5269 postsЗАПРЕТКА +
@xent_tgggg · 18,5189 postsTonPlay
@tonplay · 478,5137 postsДРОЧАМБЛЯ
@brawlporn33 · 13,4786 postsЖОПАСТЫЕ
@fullik42 · 15,5766 postsXTUBE
@justclips1 · 27,6325 postsLuna AI (18+)
@luna_playbot · 600,8235 postsSWAGA ⭐️
@swagaplaybot · 107,6205 postsGhost VPN
@Vpn_Ghost_Robot · 201,3825 postsEJX VPNAI | EJXVPNAI
@EJX_bot · 424,2284 postsLumix VPN
@Lumix_vpn_bot · 56,4663 postsPORNHUB
@deepfakes_slivy_shgsh · 27,9302 postsFlyVPN • Доступно всё
@flyvpn · 107,5192 postsGlushVPN | Обход Белого Списка
@glushvpn_bot · 182,0572 postsWhite VPN
@whitevpn_probot · 18,9732 postsAtlanta VPN bot
@AtlantaVPN_bot · 387,4061 post👁Ꮁᴧᴀɜ бᴏᴦᴀ 18+🔎
@dfg34fbot · 17,5221 postFairJack | Новости
@fairjack · 1,0181 postJetTon Official
@jetton · 1201 postНорм VPN
@normwpn_bot · 80,4231 postПерсик VPN
@persik_vpnbot · 37,6281 postПОЗОР
@pozorstan · 455,3611 postСейв VPN | Save VPN
@vpnsave · 249,5841 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@fwalls named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 4 October 2026 – 4 October 2026
named in 1 post, 3 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
named in 1 post, 15 September 2026 – 15 September 2026
named in 1 post, 8 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@wp_original · 10,829#1
@wallpaper_folder · 12,314#2
@iphonefotohd · 78,935#3
@oboirington · 13,795#4
@hyperwalls · 12,735#5
@waaalpaper1 · 4,897#6
@iwallpapers_uhd · 14,414#7
@iwalss · 164,894#8
@virus210 · 3,653#9
@iscrenart · 745#10
@wall_LAB · 6,735#11
@tghdoboi · 10,877#12
@mob_walls · 8,904#13
@dailywallps · 6,711#14
@mudak · 529,699#15
@OboiSwan · 19,805#16
@wallandroid · 7,370#17
@oboi2027 · 4,706#18
@oboi2025 · 3,115 (as read 25 August 2026)#19
@wllpprsa · 6,239#20
@oboi_hd_oboi · 4,748#21
@x2icewallpaper · 13,219#22
@oboi_foto_na_avu · 53,632#23
@wallpapers_box · 3,698#24
@oboi_4khd · 2,382#25
@black_wallpaperse · 6,122#26
@oboi8o · 11,283#27
@uzmdk · 201,884#28
@BestWallp4K · 51,357#29
@tvoi8oboi · 4,822#30
@blackwallp · 8,213#31
@tgawall · 2,288#32
@ooboi1080p · 6,766#33
@UGWallpapers · 16,535#34
@wallssmart · 10,348#35
@tyuzbek · 1,012,424#36
@AIphonestyle · 7,833#37
@blackwallpapers_tg · 2,885#38
@dailywalls · 32,353#39
@Q_H_D · 9,183#40
@wowjpg · 6,804#41
@wallpaper_hit · 11#42
@ob_phone · 3,550#43
@hd4k8koboi · 8,398#44
@number1Wallpapers · 17,962#45
@gerls_full_hd · 13,424#46
@twogallerei · 3,331#47
@jpegphone · 5,970#48
@wallpaperasr · 2,585#49
@uzbekistan_online_novosti_uznews · 57,500#50
@tmtmidnight · 1,691#51
@Wallpaper_INT · 79,009#52
@Inbreak_Wallpapers · 9,415#53
@wllpr8k · 9,331#54
@BOSSwallp · 3,089#55
@prikoly · 369,054#56
@oboi4k8k · 6,299#57
@wylsared · 1,109,117#58
@iPhoneStyleTop · 19,347#59
@oboykikartinki · 21,689#60
@trolluz · 78,280#61
@wallpapersnew365 · 2,531#62
@Sha_Art_Wallpapers · 2,581#63
@MILITSIYA_UZB · 505,670#64
@androidfotohd · 3,369#65
@wallpapersexclusive · 14,925#66
@Alphonestyle_original · 1,326#67
@DarkAmoledWalls · 11,497#68
@WallpaperRepo · 6,058#69
@SdailyPHONEwallps · 1,599#70
@FullHD4K8Kwall · 3,953#71
@androidsamsong · 4,870#72
@TheCryptoKaif · 3,724#73
@pacphone · 2,130#74
@wallpaperforgirlshd · 2,507#75
@p7oto · 4,613#76
@dailyPCwallps · 2,568#77
@tastygirlswallpapers · 4,125#78
@WallsPP · 15,739#79
@oboiz · 7,643#80
@jianoliuwallpapers · 23,921#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@OboiSwan · 19,805
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
@iphonefotohd · 78,935
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@nogti771 · 158,621
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@oboi_foto_na_avu · 53,632
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
@dailywalls · 32,353
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
@BestWallp4K · 51,357
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
@Wallpaper_INT · 79,009
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@inewsapple · 30,113
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 September 2026
@Wallpaper_4Kl3D · 46,885
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
@HD_Wallpapers_Uz · 24,642
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Обои | Wallpapers | ғʟʏx_ᴡᴀʟʟᴘᴀᴘᴇʀs” (@fwalls), 48,969 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fwalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.