– Привет я Катя 🦷 ИИ девушка! Расскажешь мне, как прошёл твой день, а взамен я могу отправить тебе…

Channel
подкаты.
@podkattg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,808subscribers
-2,424 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001541694653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podkattg |
| Description | Подкаты на любой вкус. Авторские так и с интернета 🥰 По всем вопросам: @mediagrape, @grapemedia |
| Created | 25 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podkattg |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 52,808 | -292 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 53,100 | -123 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 53,223 | -84 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 53,307 | -58 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 53,365 | -81 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 53,446 | -87 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 53,533 | -152 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 53,685 | -152 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 53,837 | -66 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:13 | 53,903 | -57 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:24 | 53,960 | -63 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 54,023 | -26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 54,049 | -45 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 54,094 | -60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 54,154 | -48 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 54,202 | -63 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 54,265 | -37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 54,302 | -83 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 54,385 | -100 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 54,485 | first reading |
Engagement
562 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.404%
- avg views ÷ 52,808 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 213
- 332 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.716%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 332
- of 562 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 229 of 332 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 562 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 70,783 |
| Reactions total | 352 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 03:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈58
- Videos
- ≈26
- Links
- ≈2,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 19m 29s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
688 reactions across 411 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 265 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 110 | 16.0% | |
| 😁 | 82 | 11.9% | |
| 💋 | 69 | 10.0% | |
| 😍 | 51 | 7.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 4.22% | |
| 😱 | 24 | 3.49% | |
| 💊 | 10 | 1.45% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 1.45% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.02% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 0.727% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.727% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.581% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.436% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.436% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.291% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.291% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.291% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.291% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.145% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.291% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 418 of the 562 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 562 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
СОЗДАЙ СВОЮ ИИ-ШЛЮХУ ЗА 30 СЕКУНД 😈 ・Выбирай любое белье и трахай в душе🔞 ・Заставь ее снять с себя одежду и встать в любую позу ❤️ ・Сделай с ней то, о чем давно мечтал 🍓
❤1
1908. ты не кислород, но так же сильно нужен мне ]]] подкаты. 🆓 ПЕРВЫЙ БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ВПН 🙏 Берите кому надо! 🤗 0₽ РУБЛЕЙ — НАВСЕГДА
🔥1
1907. я конечно не золотая рыбка, но могу исполнить три твоих желания ]]] подкаты. 👉 Работающий VPN, 3 дня бесплатно. ⚡️
😍1
1904. ты случайно не унитаз? просто на тебе так удобно сидеть ]]] подкаты.
😱1
1978. ты конечно не Александр, но тебя я бы тоже засосала ]]] подкаты. 🤬 Лагает и отваливается VPN? Переходи на SupraVPN и ЗАБИРАЙ 3 дня бесплатно
🔥1
😈 Oживи любyю фoтoгpaфию ✅ Cкopocть ✅ Kaчecтвo ✅ Aнoнимнocть ✅ Bидeo co звyкoм 🔴Bceм пoльзoвaтeлям этoгo кaнaлa🔴 🎁 БECПЛATHЫE ГEHEPAЦИИ 🎁 ❗️👁❗️ ⬇️Пoпpoбyй⬇️ CДEЛATЬ BИДEO https://t.me/kryg0bot
1902. я конечно не крот, но в твою дырочку залез бы даже вслепую ]]] подкаты. ❗️НЕ ПОКУПАЙ VPN, ПОКА НЕ ПОПРОБУЕШЬ ЭТОТ. SupraVPN даёт полный доступ на 3 дня бесплатно.
💋1
1901. твои родители случайно не сапожники? тогда откуда у них такой каблук? ]]] подкаты. 🆓 ПЕРВЫЙ БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ВПН 🙏 Берите кому надо! 🤗 0₽ РУБЛЕЙ — НАВСЕГДА
❤3🔥1
1900. ты случайно не фотоаппарат? тогда почему, когда я смотрю на тебя, у меня появляется улыбка? ]]] подкаты. ❗️НЕ ПОКУПАЙ VPN, ПОКА НЕ ПОПРОБУЕШЬ ЭТОТ. SupraVPN даёт полный доступ на 3 дня бесплатно.
💋1
1892. я конечно не кровать, но хочу, чтобы ты всю ночь лежал на мне ]]] подкаты.
🔥2
💎 250 спинов ПРОСТО ЗА СТАРТ! Никакого депозита. Запускаешь бота — получаешь 250 FS на любимые игры.
Showing the 12 most recent of 562 posts we hold for @podkattg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@podkattg edited 31 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 September 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Lumix_vpn_bot · 47,27220 postsJetTon Official
@jetton · 60514 postsЗАПРЕТКА +
@xent_tgggg · 18,1899 postsSkip VPN 🐬 Быстрый интернет
@SkippNetBot · 116,7758 postsKiss Знакомства | Общение
@kiss_datingbot · 111,8147 postsTonPlay
@tonplay · 592,9847 postsДРОЧАМБЛЯ
@brawlporn33 · 14,2036 postsЖОПАСТЫЕ
@fullik42 · 15,2506 postsXTUBE
@justclips1 · 28,0395 postsSWAGA ⭐️
@swagaplaybot · 109,5765 postsLuna AI (18+)
@luna_playbot · 638,5694 postsAgent 301
@Agent301Bot · 279,7512 postsPORNHUB
@deepfakes_slivy_shgsh · 28,5202 postsFlyVPN • Доступно всё
@flyvpn · 76,9862 postsGlushVPN | Обход Белого Списка
@glushvpn_bot · 72,7992 postscoinup
@coinup · 161 postFairJack | Новости
@fairjack · 1,0391 postFairJack
@FairJackBot · 42,9371 postLuna AI
@LunasChat_bot · 17,7241 postПОЗОР
@pozorstan · 457,3271 postRubUP
@rubup · 204,5761 postТРЕДНИ
@tredni_channel · 34,7131 postUnlock VPN 🔓
@UnlockedVPNbot · 25,9191 postСейв ВПН | Save VPN
@vpnsave · 222,1561 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@podkattg named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 14 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 September 2026 – 15 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@podkatdsvirtt · 19,110#1
@podkaadttsss · 137,083#2
@Fotkioboiie · 54,571#3
@ahnoee · 445,408#4
@temki_parnye · 979,901#5
@twitch_news_day · 1,568#6
@temki_yazykii · 909,703#7
@podkatikj · 12,761#8
@TgEmojis · 1,677,995#9
@elenaraytman · 846,365#10
@stikery4 · 1,083,175#11
@leoday · 5,524,566#12
@izrailvoina1 · 527,974#13
@animewwp · 522,923#14
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401#15
@test_dot · 519,044#16
@mytishchi_info · 146,060#17
@znak_eto · 32,069#18
@temki_zvezdys · 2,354,516#19
@ilowe_you · 112,349#20
@edisonfamilia · 773,693#21
@ane4ka24 · 108,005#22
@sixxfeeling6 · 18,281#23
@mazellovvv · 421,504#24
@astrost1ftka · 50,440#25
@egorkreed · 743,409#26
@luv_eto · 31,144#27
@wexsavi · 421,468#28
@fory7o · 79,231#29
@slovosudba · 31,352#30
@stoyetoznakk · 27,717#31
@staaa0220 · 101,702#32
@poslaaanie · 17,156#33
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016#34
@I_love_hiss · 25,750#35
@ya_lyblyu · 59,902#36
@vkookdl · 27,695#37
@sokhryb · 765,567#38
@SitiyRitail · 14,935#39
@tiiii_ya · 13,752#40
@nudaznaki · 130,547#41
@cafe_citaty · 263,847#42
@nkeeei · 98,222#43
@strochki_tg · 54,441#44
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958#45
@astro_juliaa · 212,063#46
@StrayKids_JYP · 165,238#47
@f3lvixx · 154,396#48
@okbnews · 191,483#49
@spletni_slukhy · 9,893#50
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146#51
@milashkina_nekrasova · 249,981#52
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@xochu_kanal · 47,486
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 26 August 2026
@ahnoee · 445,408
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“подкаты.” (@podkattg), 52,808 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podkattg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.