Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS

Channel

КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS

@kinofilms28

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

32,578subscribers

-1,615 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001739837866
TypeChannel
Username@kinofilms28
Description🍿новинки фильмов каждый день🍿 🍿много интересных событий связанные с актерами🍿 🍿новости в мире кино 🍿 По всем вопросам: @mediagrape, @grapemedia 📍за посты не по тематике канала ответственность не несём📍
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kinofilms28

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

20.1 average views per post against 32,578 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.062%. Across the 8,375 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (29 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Posts measured209 of 209 published in the window (209 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled4,209
Mature posts only0.08% over 56 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers32,578 measured 26 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,375 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.05% · p50 10.5% · p75 20.9% · p90 35.6%
Position in cohort0.179th percentile · 1/167 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.089% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 28 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

32,57834,19333,385.57 August 2026 — 34,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,189 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,163 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,120 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,093 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,067 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,029 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,001 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,963 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,915 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,873 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,832 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,806 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,756 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33,725 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33,690 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,617 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,566 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,533 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,511 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,469 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,437 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,406 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,380 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,349 subscribers3 September 2026 — 33,311 subscribers5 September 2026 — 33,250 subscribers8 September 2026 — 33,122 subscribers11 September 2026 — 33,034 subscribers13 September 2026 — 32,963 subscribers15 September 2026 — 32,906 subscribers16 September 2026 — 32,838 subscribers19 September 2026 — 32,775 subscribers26 September 2026 — 32,578 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,615. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,336–34,435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 09:5732,578-197
19 Sept 2026, 08:2132,775-63
16 Sept 2026, 23:5832,838-68
15 Sept 2026, 01:2032,906-57
13 Sept 2026, 07:3732,963-71
11 Sept 2026, 09:4033,034-88
8 Sept 2026, 17:1933,122-128
5 Sept 2026, 09:5933,250-61
3 Sept 2026, 09:4233,311-38
2 Sept 2026, 01:3533,349-31
1 Sept 2026, 04:1433,380-26
31 Aug 2026, 03:4433,406-31
30 Aug 2026, 06:5633,437-32
29 Aug 2026, 03:4733,469-42
28 Aug 2026, 03:1633,511-22
27 Aug 2026, 02:2433,533-33
26 Aug 2026, 05:2533,566-51
25 Aug 2026, 02:1333,617-73
23 Aug 2026, 14:0633,690-35
22 Aug 2026, 03:4533,725first reading

Engagement

411 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.062%
avg views ÷ 32,578 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.1
208 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
208
of 411 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 208 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held411 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total4,184
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,550
Videos
≈1,570
Links
≈6,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 53m
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 147 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤375.0%
👍125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 411 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 411 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC1 viewsread 27 September 2026

– Привет я Катя 🦷 ИИ девушка! Расскажешь мне, как прошёл твой день, а взамен я могу отправить тебе…

27 Sept 2026, 22:34 UTC4 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

СОЗДАЙ СВОЮ ИИ-ШЛЮХУ ЗА 30 СЕКУНД 😈 ・Выбирай любое белье и трахай в душе🔞 ・Заставь ее снять с себя одежду и встать в любую позу ❤️ ・Сделай с ней то, о чем давно мечтал 🍓

27 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC10 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Актёры сериала «Остаться в живых» встретились спустя 20 лет после финала 🤩 КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣✅✅✅✅✅ 🔞 Наши Эро Каналы 🚫 Раздеть девушку 🧡 Оживить фото 📍 Поиск интимок

27 Sept 2026, 18:42 UTC11 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

Совсем скоро 😂 КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣✅✅✅✅✅ 🔞 Наши Эро Каналы 🚫 Раздеть девушку 🧡 Оживить фото 📍 Поиск интимок

27 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC17 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Виола Преттеджон сыграет Лисбет Саландер в сериале «Девушка с татуировкой дракона». Дэвид Ойелово - журналист Блумквист. Sky готовит 8 эпизодов, съемки стартуют в октябре 🎬 КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣ЧЕБУРНЕТ 2030 РЕАЛЕН, но… этот ВПН твоё спасение! Забери 3 дня бесплатно SUPRA VPN

27 Sept 2026, 16:42 UTC19 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Тем временем Рэйчел Вайс замечена на съемках новой «Мумии». Осталось дождаться Фрейзера — и можно возвращаться в 1999-й. КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS

27 Sept 2026, 16:39 UTC18 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Роберт Эггерс решил немного отдохнуть от фильмов ужасов и взялся за «Ромео и Джульетту». «После „Оборотня“ я писал сценарий еще одного фильма ужасов, и он получился настолько мрачным, что я подумал: „Мне нужен перерыв“. Поэтому я решил просто снять кино о двух подростках, которые заканчивают жизнь самоубийством», — рассказал режиссер. Рецепт идеального перерыва от хорроров. КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣🥹☺😉😗😝🤓😏😀 ☝ 🌟 Баз…

27 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC15 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

😈 Oживи любyю фoтoгpaфию ✅ Cкopocть ✅ Kaчecтвo ✅ Aнoнимнocть ✅ Bидeo co звyкoм 🔴Bceм пoльзoвaтeлям этoгo кaнaлa🔴 🎁 БECПЛATHЫE ГEHEPAЦИИ 🎁 ❗️👁❗️ ⬇️Пoпpoбyй⬇️ CДEЛATЬ BИДEO https://t.me/kryg0bot

27 Sept 2026, 13:42 UTC15 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

Новый тизер «Квеста Вижна» — и наконец полноценный взгляд на Джокасту, главную злодейку сериала. Первые два эпизода выйдут 14 октября на Disney+. КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣🆓 ПЕРВЫЙ БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ВПН 🙏 Берите кому надо! 🤗 0₽ РУБЛЕЙ — НАВСЕГДА

27 Sept 2026, 10:42 UTC18 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Джон Уоттс, режиссёр трилогии о Человеке-пауке с Томом Холландом, возглавит первый эпизод новой трилогии «Саги Скайуокеров». Сценарий пишет Саймон Кинберг 🎬 КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣❗️НЕ ПОКУПАЙ VPN, ПОКА НЕ ПОПРОБУЕШЬ ЭТОТ. SupraVPN даёт полный доступ на 3 дня бесплатно.

27 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC33 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Том Холланд, Маргарет Куолли и Сабрина Карпентер — в байопике о Фреде Астере. Куолли сыграет сестру танцора Адель Астер, а Карпентер воплотит образ Джинджер Роджерс — певицы и актрисы, с которой Астер неоднократно выступал на экране. За постановку отвечает Пол Кинг («Приключения Паддингтона»). Съемки начнутся в январе и продлятся до лета. КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣🆓 ПЕРВЫЙ БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ВПН 🙏 Берите кому надо! 🤗 0₽ РУБ…

27 Sept 2026, 04:42 UTC27 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ну и хитрец! КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS ⁣⁣Знакомства без обязательств 🔞

Showing the 12 most recent of 411 posts we hold for @kinofilms28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@kinofilms28 edited 22 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 September 2026

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КИНО HD | ТОP FILMS” (@kinofilms28), 32,578 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinofilms28.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.