Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 永發活动福利频道 总押800万美金

Channel

永發活动福利频道 总押800万美金

@ying

Has discussion group4 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,882subscribers

-1,747 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001763821734
TypeChannel
Usernames@xinyongtai @YFYL8 @ying @yongfayule
Description永發娱乐活动福利频道 @ying 🔥本集团在全网合计总上押800万美金! 🔥永發赢钱提款 百万U出款秒到 🔥每日88888活动福利! 🔥放心玩 · 放心赢 · 放心提 💲 @YFYL @YFYX 欢迎各位老板前来爆庄提款!💲
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held112
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ying

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ying/7311 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC@daligaosu/591017 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC1.005.9 hours
@ying/7478 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC@daligaosu/70452 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC1.003.6 hours
@ying/7702 · this entry25 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC@daligaosu/882325 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC1.001.8 hours
@ying/7797 · this entry2 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC@daligaosu/94252 Oct 2026, 17:41 UTC1.003.3 hours
@ying/7690 · this entry24 Sept 2026, 00:02 UTC@daligaosu/95984 Oct 2026, 16:19 UTC1.0011 days
@ying/7626 · this entry18 Sept 2026, 01:40 UTC@daligaosu/101759 Oct 2026, 16:00 UTC1.0022 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@daligaosu21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.7 hoursthis entry (20–1)
@dalihongbao16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005.4 hoursthis entry (15–1)
@diaohongbao13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.6 hoursthis entry (12–1)
@dutulmpd9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005.9 hoursthis entry (8–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 731 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @dutulmpd. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

31,61833,65632,63731,88214 August 202613 November 2026
112 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,747. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,312–33,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 112
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 14:5931,882+18
11 Nov 2026, 15:1231,864-6
11 Nov 2026, 02:1831,870+198
9 Nov 2026, 19:4831,672+48
9 Nov 2026, 07:5531,624-20
8 Nov 2026, 12:0531,644-11
8 Nov 2026, 02:0131,655-13
7 Nov 2026, 03:2631,668-5
6 Nov 2026, 21:5431,673+7
6 Nov 2026, 01:1631,666-8
5 Nov 2026, 20:4731,674+15
5 Nov 2026, 00:0931,659no change
4 Nov 2026, 19:5931,659-6
3 Nov 2026, 21:3031,665+10
3 Nov 2026, 18:4731,655+17
2 Nov 2026, 23:5431,638+1
2 Nov 2026, 17:0531,637-34
1 Nov 2026, 22:2631,671+1
1 Nov 2026, 17:3631,670+34
31 Oct 2026, 18:5831,636first reading

Engagement

780 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.24%
avg views ÷ 31,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
258 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.127%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
260
of 780 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 177 of 258 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held780 (12 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total348,925
Reactions total321
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 18:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,020
Videos
≈67
Links
≈1,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

752 reactions across 408 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40654.0%
👍31141.4%
👎131.73%
💩121.60%
🤣30.399%
🔥20.266%
🥰20.266%
🫡20.266%
🤔10.133%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 460 of the 780 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 752 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 780 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 260 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC442 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 20000.00 👥空投数量: 20 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-14 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-14 - 11-14, 流水:>=100000 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

👍1

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

13 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC353 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 10000.00 👥空投数量: 100 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-14 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-14 - 11-14, 流水:>=10000 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

👍1

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

13 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC278 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 10000.00 👥空投数量: 1000 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-14 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-14 - 11-14, 流水:>=1000 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

👍1

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

13 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC251 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 1500.00 👥空投数量: 10 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-14 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-14 - 11-14, 流水:>=15000 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

👍1

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

13 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 1500.00 👥空投数量: 100 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-14 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-14 - 11-14, 流水:>=1500 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

👍1

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

13 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 1500.00 👥空投数量: 1000 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-14 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-14 - 11-14, 流水:>=150 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

👍1

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

13 Nov 2026, 11:57 UTC588 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🎉 永发电子今日喜讯来啦—— 📣 恭喜老板****642 2一注爆奖😃😄😃😄😄r,盈利😃😃😄😃😄 倍,漂亮拿下!🎆 👏 恭喜老板这波收获满满,实力发挥得相当精彩! 💫 好成绩值得记录,好心情当然也要分享出来! 爆浆视频https://www.ppreplaylink.net/LhBarvj8i9 🥳 感谢老板主动分享喜悦,祝接下来继续乘势而上,收获更多精彩战绩!✨

👍3❤1

Signed 永发电子客服 小桃@y555

12 Nov 2026, 23:34 UTC≈4,960 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

招一批通道支付宝微信码商,仅用于永发客户上分收款,点位5%;只做小额100-499档位的回u可上浮0.1 支付宝转账,微信进群转账; 押金100u起(合作期间包永久司法) 网页自动接单,,收款到账了自动确认,小白可教,口嗨勿扰,要做的联系 @y444

👍3

Signed 永發娱乐-海

12 Nov 2026, 17:26 UTC≈9,840 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

😀 永發娱乐重大更新 😀 😀感谢各位老板的支持与厚爱,为满足各位老板需求,经集团决定 😃 开通永发手摇🎲牛群😃 公群1588 永发手摇骰牛(反水 1%) 😃 限红1-10000U 全新🎲牛牛玩法,最高赔率17倍!高赔率高限红! 🔥本集团在全网合计总上押800万美金😃! 🔥永發赢钱提款 百万U😃出款秒到 ! 🔥每日88888活动福利! 🔥放心玩 · 放心赢 · 放心提 💲 欢迎各位老板前来爆庄提款!💲

❤1

Signed 永發娱乐-海

12 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC933 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026

永发综合开业福利活动 活动一: 每日福利群,当日流水达到500r😃即可参与奖金池抽奖活动,多少人参与就发多少r多少包,0点发红包 抢到最高金额,奖励1888r😃 抢到最低金额,奖励888r😃 抢到顺子,奖励1888r😃(只能是正顺,不包含数字0) 抢到1.11金额,奖励2888r😃 抢到2.22金额,奖励当日6888r😃(⚠为了更加的彰显公平公正, 每天福利群发红包后客服投掷2颗骰子,2.22金额需要由本身抢到的红包金额+2颗骰子点数之和组成的小数点后两位组成! 例如2颗骰子为5和6就是0.11,抢到2.11后,2.11+0.05+0.06=2.22) 抢到3.33金额,清空奖池(⚠为了更加的彰显公平公正, 每天福利群发红包后客服投掷2颗骰子,3.33金额需要由本身抢到的红包金额+2颗骰子共同确定,第一个骰子点数加在第三位,第二个骰子点数加在第二位 例如抢到2.67,第一个骰子6,第二个骰子6,就是2.67+0.06+0.6=…

👍1🥰1

Signed 永发综合盘客服 小欣@y888

12 Nov 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 1500.00 👥空投数量: 10 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-13 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-13 - 11-13, 流水:>=15000 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

12 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC843 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🧧🧧🧧🧧永发娱乐彩金红包!仅限电子流水下分不限红!永发官方频道 每日彩金红包雨 @ying 点击领取🧧永发娱乐全网豪送🧧🧧🧧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰空投金额: 1500.00 👥空投数量: 100 ⏰有效期至: 2026-11-13 23:59:00 💎领取条件:消耗0钻石 📊领取条件:11-13 - 11-13, 流水:>=1500 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Signed 永發彩金客服小萌 @y999

Showing the 12 most recent of 780 posts we hold for @ying. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ying edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 10 posts on @ying as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
7

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

@DaLu 盈旺娱乐-全网总押千万
@dalu · 9,846 (as read 4 September 2026)
#1
腾博会集团/腾博娱乐
@teng · 9,298
#2
赌徒担保唯一官方导航 @dbgq
@GQDBNEW · 42,402
#3
国民娱乐城
@guomin999 · 692
#4
PC28开奖频道-开奖结果查询
@pc28 · 22,528 (as read 4 September 2026)
#5
赌神之路
@dushenzhilu · 4,357
#6
金届集团游戏中转站频道
@jinjueyule · 271
#7
telegram 高速飞机代理
@hgwzcd · 243,094
#8
大舞台
@dawutai · 1,937
#9
不谈钱 只说缘
@qaqxy · 515
#10
赌圈大事件
@PC2288 · 18,212
#11
将军担保博彩公群@JJAA
@jjaa · 10,606
#12
金博飞投 @jbft
@jbft · 96,089 (as read 4 September 2026)
#13
达利电子福利频道
@dalidianzi · 24,396
#14
沙龙会娱乐 - U8.cc -官方频道
@slhcc8888 · 1,740
#15
黑道(担保频道)
@heidao · 1,205
#16
福利来每日抽奖红包
@FLLQB8 · 116
#17
零的躺平日记
@lin77700 · 162
#18
xbhxcp
@xbhxcp · 5
#19
J1娱乐|官方频道
@j1com · 2,595
#20
爆奖吧官方频道
@jeep · 5,173 (as read 4 September 2026)
#21
富婆日记
@fuporiji · 21,788
#22

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

赌徒担保唯一官方导航 @dbgq
@GQDBNEW · 42,402
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 14 here — alongside 13 others — read 30 August 2026
Telegram免费代理 @FLL8
@DFHSTYLT · 51,202
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 24 August 2026
法拉利公群 @FLL8
@fll8 · 79,868
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 20 August 2026
赌圈大事件
@PC2288 · 18,212
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 4 October 2026
投机之路
@toujizhilu · 24,531
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“永發活动福利频道 总押800万美金” (@ying), 31,882 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ying.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.