Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for استراتژی برتر

Channel

استراتژی برتر

@BourseStrategi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,679subscribers

-414 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119973473
TypeChannel
Username@BourseStrategi
Descriptionاستراتژی برتر تحلیل های این کانال صرفا تحلیل شخصی است و چه بسا که با خطا همراه باشد و نباید مبنای تصمیم گیری شما عزیزان باشد. @broker2080 :ارتباط با ما
Created27 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BourseStrategi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@codal_tahlil/12124712 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC@BourseStrategi/38966 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@BourseStrategi/38998 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC@codal_tahlil/12133519 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC1.0085 minutes
@codal_tahlil/12136122 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC@BourseStrategi/39015 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@codal_tahlil/1220341 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC@BourseStrategi/39312 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC1.0010 minutes
@PayamElyaskordi/2413319 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC@BourseStrategi/39000 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC0.9956 minutes
@PayamElyaskordi/261128 Nov 2026, 13:27 UTC@BourseStrategi/39355 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC0.9918 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@codal_tahlil32 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@codal_tahlil (26–6)
@PayamElyaskordi5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9918 minutes@PayamElyaskordi (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 27 of the 28 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 165 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @codal_tahlil. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,67916,09315,8866 August 2026 — 16,093 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,093 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,088 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,080 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,069 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,067 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,063 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,055 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,050 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,042 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,036 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,030 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,025 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,015 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,010 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,004 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,999 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,981 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,966 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,960 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,958 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,957 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,944 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,941 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,935 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,926 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,917 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,913 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,905 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,894 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,887 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,884 subscribers25 September 2026 — 15,867 subscribers4 October 2026 — 15,839 subscribers8 October 2026 — 15,819 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,810 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,801 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,797 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,798 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,793 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,791 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,785 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,781 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,776 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,773 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,770 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,763 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,746 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,737 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,725 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,719 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,717 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,710 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,702 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,697 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,693 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,691 subscribers9 November 2026 — 15,683 subscribers10 November 2026 — 15,679 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net -414. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,617–16,155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 18:2815,679-4
9 Nov 2026, 07:3615,683-8
7 Nov 2026, 20:5115,691-2
6 Nov 2026, 22:0815,693-4
4 Nov 2026, 17:3815,697-5
3 Nov 2026, 15:2715,702-8
2 Nov 2026, 13:3515,710-7
1 Nov 2026, 13:0615,717-2
31 Oct 2026, 14:4815,719-6
30 Oct 2026, 13:1015,725-12
29 Oct 2026, 12:2715,737-9
27 Oct 2026, 17:4015,746-17
26 Oct 2026, 18:2715,763-7
25 Oct 2026, 17:4815,770-3
24 Oct 2026, 20:0815,773-3
23 Oct 2026, 19:5715,776-5
22 Oct 2026, 20:5415,781-4
21 Oct 2026, 14:0615,785-6
19 Oct 2026, 13:1415,791-2
17 Oct 2026, 12:2915,793first reading

Engagement

212 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.05%
avg views ÷ 15,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.664%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 212 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 59 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held212 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total93,692
Reactions total564
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 06:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,290
Videos
≈41
Links
≈632

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,632 reactions across 182 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎58235.7%
👍52432.1%
❤32219.7%
👏1499.13%
😢352.14%
😭201.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 183 of the 212 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,632 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 17:34 UTC503 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

با صرف حداکثر 7 دقیقه از وقت ارزشمندتان و شرکت در این پرسشنامه، دیدگاه‌ها و تجربه‌های خود را با ما به اشتراک بگذارید و در شکل‌گیری آینده‌ای بهتر برای سرمایه‌گذاری و توسعه صنعت طلای دیجیتال نقش مؤثری داشته باشید. 🎁 به پاس همراهی شما، 3 سوت طلا اهدا خواهد شد. 🔗لینک شرکت در نظرسنجی👇 https://jryn.me/lRe0yA

11 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC968 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#طلا ۱۸ عیار اومده رسیده به این خط رونده روی قیمت ۲۵ میلیون امروز خیلی مهمه براش اگه از دست بره حداقل تا ۲۴ میتونه اصلاح کنه باید ببینیم کندل روزانه امروز چجوری بسته میشه

👍4❤3

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

11 Nov 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,440 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#خودرو ارزش بازار ایران خودرو به قیمت محصولات پژو نسبت ارزش بازار ایران خودرو به متوسط قیمت پژو به 120 هزار دستگاه رسید به عبارتی دیگر شما اگر 120 هزار دستگاه پژو (عمدتا"207) بفروشی مالک کل ایران خودرو میشی ایران خودرو 7 ماهه امسال 245 هزار دستگاه انواع پژو ، سورن و تارا و .. تولید کرده است. این نسبت در زمستان 402 حدود 200 هزار دستگاه و در بهار 1402 حدود 463 هزار دستگاه بود.

😢2❤1

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

11 Nov 2026, 05:35 UTC969 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🔻روند ۳۰ روزه ارزش سفارش‌های خرید و فروش در پیش‌گشایش بازار سهام

❤2

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

11 Nov 2026, 05:34 UTC932 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

آغاز معاملات بازار #بورس و #فرابورس با برتری 94 درصدی نمادهای سبزپوش و 25 همت سفارش خرید در برابر 2 همت عرضه

👍1

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

10 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,200 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🔻دبیر شورای‌عالی امنیت ملی: تمام ادعاهای آمریکایی‌ها درباره ادامۀ مذاکرات با ایران و برگزاری نشست در قطر، دروغ است ‌▪️ادعاهای آمریکایی‌ها دربارۀ ادامۀ مذاکرات با هدف کاهش فشارهای اقتصادی و پایین‌آوردن قیمت نفت مطرح شده است ‌▪️خبرهای منتشرشده دربارۀ برنامه‌ریزی برای دیدار من با ونس، معاون رئیس‌جمهور آمریکا، کاملاً نادرست و بی‌اساس است ‌▪️تنگۀ هرمز تا زمان اجرای ۷ شرط ایران بازگشایی نمی‌شود.

👍9👎6❤1😢1

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

10 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

صندوق‌های طلا با دو لایه تخفیف؛ ترکیب سبد را هم ببینیم امروز هم‌زمان با سررسید آپشن‌های آبان شمش طلا، تامین وجه تسویه بخشی از موقعیت‌ها به فشار فروش شمش اضافه کرده؛ به‌طوری‌که شمش با دلار مبنای ۲۴۵ هزار تومان، حدودا ۶٪ پایین‌تر از ارزش محاسباتی معامله می‌شود. این کاهش قیمت در NAV صندوق‌ها هم منعکس شده و از طرف دیگر، بخشی از صندوق‌ها زیر NAV معامله می‌شوند؛ یعنی تخفیف روی دارایی پایه، در کنار حباب منفی خود صندوق. ترکی…

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 12 November 2026

#مهم ترامپ مدعی شد: #جنگ_با_ایران از نظر نظامی عملاً پایان یافته و ما بنا به درخواست کشورهای همسایه ایران، وضعیت موجود را [#محاصره_دریایی و #محاصره_هوایی ] حفظ می‌کنیم!

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

10 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,260 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#بورس ۲۶ هزار میلیارد تومن تو صف خرید نشستند سهم بخرن تاریخ ۱۹ آبان ۱۴۰۵

❤1👏1

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

9 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,350 views175 reactionsread 12 November 2026

بازار فردا مثبت👍 منفی👎

👍151👎24

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

9 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,430 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

سقف ساتنا، پایا و پل افزایش یافت ✅در این راستا شبکه بانکی بایستی اقدامات فنی لازم را در سامانه های متمرکز خود انجام داده و با توجه به بازنگری صورت گرفته در خصوص حدود مبالغ دستور پرداخت‌های انتقال وجه بین‌بانکی در سامانه‌های ملی پرداخت (بر اساس مصوبات سیزدهمین جلسه کمیسیون ابزارهای پرداخت و تسویه این بانک مورخ 15‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‏/06‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‏/1405)، حدود مصوب شده جدید به شرح زیر را اعمال کنند: 🔹 افزایش کف مبلغ د…

👍3❤1👏1

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

9 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,320 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

CNN ایران و آمریکا به طور «محرمانه» در حال مذاکره درباره «توافقی حساس» هستند که می‌تواند مانع بازگشت جنگ شود و زمینه را برای آغاز مذاکرات گسترده‌تر، فراهم کند

👎4👍1

Signed پشتیبانی اعتبارینو️

Showing the 12 most recent of 212 posts we hold for @BourseStrategi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @BourseStrategi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خانه کارگر
@khanehkargar · 55,091
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
بورس کوتاه مدت
@boursekootahmodat · 37,630
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
بورس آنلاین|O.B
@ON_bourse · 30,750
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
هوشمند
@HOSHMANDchannell · 25,877
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
سیگنال برتر
@ChanelVIP20 · 51,718
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
گلدن سیگنال (ویژه)
@goldenn_signall · 20,487
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
تاپ سیگنال (Vip)
@VIP_Top_Signal · 19,527
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
گلدن بورس
@Goldenn_Bourse · 48,708
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان (آفاق)
@SignalRaygan_Afagh · 30,021
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“استراتژی برتر” (@BourseStrategi), 15,679 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BourseStrategi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.