Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Football Plug Media

@football_plug

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

13,989subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001396049045
TypeChannel
Username@football_plug
DescriptionI blog about Football and I create Football content to Educate and Entertain. No copyright infringement is intended. I do not own nor claim to own the rights to any of the content shared here. Buy ads here: Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/football_plug
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/football_plug

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@thefootball_hub/279195 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC@football_plug/91251 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC1.0011 hours
@thefootball_hub/279356 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC@football_plug/91256 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC1.0083 minutes
@thefootball_hub/279366 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC@football_plug/91255 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC1.0081 minutes
@thefootball_hub/279487 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC@football_plug/91261 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC1.003.2 hours
@thefootball_hub/279497 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC@football_plug/91262 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC1.003.1 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@thefootball_hub5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.1 hours@thefootball_hub (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @thefootball_hub. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,98914,05214,020.57 August 2026 — 14,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,052 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,038 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,026 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,011 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,999 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,989 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,980–14,061 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:2313,989-10
11 Aug 2026, 06:2113,999-12
10 Aug 2026, 06:0014,011-15
9 Aug 2026, 03:5414,026-12
8 Aug 2026, 07:2614,038-14
7 Aug 2026, 12:1514,052no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:0914,052first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.30%
avg views ÷ 13,989 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.885%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held59 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total68,522
Reactions total501
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
65,000
Videos
10,600
Links
2,760

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

501 reactions across 46 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39979.6%
🔥479.38%
🤣142.79%
👍122.40%
🥰122.40%
🥴102.00%
😁40.798%
💔20.399%
🤡10.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 501reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC498 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

𝐓𝐇𝐄 🆕 𝐄𝐔𝐑𝐎𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐎𝐍 𝐊𝐈𝐂𝐊𝐒 𝐎𝐅𝐅 𝐓𝐎𝐃𝐀𝐘 🔥 Reigning Champions League winners PSG face Europa League champions Aston Villa in Salzburg, Austria 🇦🇹 Will the Parisians add another trophy to their collection, or can Unai Emery’s Villa become the first UEL winners since 2018 to lift the cup? 🏆 It’s time for the 𝐔𝐄𝐅𝐀 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐮𝐩 ⚔️

🔥15

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

12 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC542 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

1

Signed Inside Ads

11 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,020 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Myles Lewis-Skelly has been offered to Chelsea and Manchester United 👀

🥴103💔2🔥1

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

11 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,050 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨🟡🔵 Romelu Lukaku to Fenerbahçe, here we go! Green light from Napoli as club to club agreement has been reached. New bid revealed last night worth over €6m has been accepted, Lukaku has also agreed all terms. Verbal agreement so far, paperwork to be checked today.

11

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

11 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC880 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

1

Signed Inside Ads

10 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC≈1,170 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨🇺🇾 Liverpool and Barcelona have exchanged all documents for Ronald Araujo deal. Everything signed as Araujo will soon be unveiled as new #LFC defender. Exclusive story, confirmed.

10

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

10 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC≈1,120 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨🔴🔵 Barcelona expect to receive opening official bid for Ferran Torres from Paris Saint-Germain shortly. Ferran’s camp and PSG informed Barça about the verbal agreement on personal terms.

11

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

10 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,050 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Darwin Núñez sends a heart felt message to Ronald Araújo, as his Uruguayan teammate looks set to join Liverpool FC ♥️🇺🇾

8

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

10 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈1,010 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Thibaut Courtois says he is excited to work with José Mourinho again, this time at Real Madrid 🤝 🗣️ “We were together at Chelsea, and we won the Premier League together. I have good memories of him, and I’m happy to be under his guidance again. We hope to work well together and have great years here.”

17

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

10 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC984 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Pedri has decided to follow in his fellow World Cup winner's footsteps as he joins Barcelona teammate Gavi in dying his hair 🤪💈🇪🇸

13

Signed Muhammed Olamilekan

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @football_plug. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@football_plug edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Football Plug Media” (@football_plug), 13,989 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/football_plug.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.