Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Don’t Be Too Emotional English Subtitles 2026

Channel

Don’t Be Too Emotional English Subtitles 2026

@bl_lover57

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,395subscribers

+718 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002782718575
TypeChannel
Username@bl_lover57
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bl_lover57

Growth

7,6778,3958,0367 August 2026 — 7,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,677 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,709 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,794 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,888 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,957 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,987 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,096 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,135 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,253 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,282 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,395 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net +718. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,569–8,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 12:008,395+113
2 Sept 2026, 07:588,282+29
30 Aug 2026, 09:038,253+118
27 Aug 2026, 06:538,135+39
24 Aug 2026, 07:588,096+109
20 Aug 2026, 18:387,987+30
17 Aug 2026, 20:597,957+69
14 Aug 2026, 19:457,888+94
11 Aug 2026, 10:547,794+85
8 Aug 2026, 05:027,709+32
7 Aug 2026, 18:317,677no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:217,677first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 8,395 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,090
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 59 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held91 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total131,670
Reactions total2,165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12h 19m
Average length
1h 07m

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,938 reactions across 81 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,45087.6%
🔥1553.94%
❤‍🔥1122.84%
🥰882.23%
😢290.736%
🍓240.609%
👏240.609%
💋120.305%
🎉100.254%
💔90.229%
😍70.178%
😘50.127%
🐳40.102%
🤩40.102%
🌭20.051%
🤣20.051%
🎅10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC474 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

👆 If this 3 episode does not reach 100+ reactions No Next episodes Next Week Don't take it as a Joke 🙃

11

28 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC474 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

[@tharntypeblseries1].Dont.Be.Too.Emotional.S01E10.IQ.x264.1080p

21🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,280 views128 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Don’t Be Too Emotional (2026) [EP-10] 480p WEB-DL English Hard Sub Free Download Join 👉 All Our Channel Links 🖇️ #DontBeTooEmotional #DontBeTooEmotionalTheSeries @tharntypeblseries1 @bl_lover57

120🥰7👏1

28 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,100 views98 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Don’t Be Too Emotional (2026) [EP-10] 720p WEB-DL English Hard Sub Free Download Join 👉 All Our Channel Links 🖇️ #DontBeTooEmotional #DontBeTooEmotionalTheSeries @tharntypeblseries1 @bl_lover57

95🔥2🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,080 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Don’t Be Too Emotional EP09👆 No Reaction No Upload

31

28 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,020 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

4

27 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,500 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @bl_lover57. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bl_lover57 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Don’t Be Too Emotional English Subtitles 2026” (@bl_lover57), 8,395 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bl_lover57.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.