Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

◉东南亚中文新闻

@syxw5

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49,666subscribers

-1,589 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002452355951
TypeChannel
Username@syxw5
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/syxw5

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@syxw5/51110 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC@syxw7/524327 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC1.0072 seconds
@syxw5/51123 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC@syxw7/524447 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC1.0028 minutes
@syxw5/51158 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC@syxw7/524967 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC1.001.8 hours
@syxw5/51163 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC@syxw7/525097 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC1.003.0 hours
@syxw7/524307 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC@syxw5/51124 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC0.963.3 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@syxw75 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9967 minutesthis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 34 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @syxw7. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

49,66651,25550,460.57 August 2026 — 51,255 subscribers7 August 2026 — 51,249 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,887 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,723 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,428 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,107 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,929 subscribers13 August 2026 — 49,772 subscribers15 August 2026 — 49,666 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1,589. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,428–51,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:0449,666-106
13 Aug 2026, 15:5749,772-157
12 Aug 2026, 14:4849,929-178
11 Aug 2026, 15:2650,107-321
10 Aug 2026, 12:3350,428-295
9 Aug 2026, 09:1150,723-164
8 Aug 2026, 11:0450,887-362
7 Aug 2026, 14:2351,249-6
7 Aug 2026, 12:1651,255first reading

Engagement

230 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.964%
avg views ÷ 49,666 subscribers
Avg views / post
479
230 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
230
of 230 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held230 (7 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total110,123
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37m 24s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 65 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC9 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:波贝的AGA SPORT全都是骗子❗️ 一个中国人和本地人一起开的KTV,互相勾结骗钱的地方!!! 柬埔寨波贝ABA银行路口进去不远,有个AGA的地方,里面几个老东西,一个叫力哥的老东西,骗钱跑路,操他妈死全家的狗玩意,捞人救命的钱也骗,简直丧尽天良!!!捞人先收钱,前后给了36000u,收了钱一直拖,最开始说一个星期,然后又一个星期,再一个月,现在快两个月,直接拉黑了,还威胁别人说找麻烦,简直可笑,等着吧,救命钱拿命换,留着给你收尸吧! 知情者提供线索协助抓到人的或者直接抓到人送到指定地方的,必有重谢! 🕑#广告赞助商 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥😁🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 jinbei199.cc 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮 xh8113.cc ✅订阅安危头条新闻 🎙 http

14 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC8 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:图1白衣服男子是柬埔寨金水园区9-3-333法国和意大利快杀盘总(高脚)又叫苏总(早期在菲律宾开赌博盘,他老家人都叫他“明总”)。 边上是他同学,图1是2025年过年的时候在别墅区拍摄,图2微信是他在国内福建石狮碧桂园小区开设诈骗盘口煮饭的后勤,不想解决,那就不要解决了,我这两天也想开了,放下以前的自己,迎接新的开始~ 事情经过: 高脚(苏总)福建安溪人,去年安排路线让我从国内到柬埔寨西港绿巨人园区他朋友的公司做精聊,在国内我就说了不做精聊,多次叫我出国,用高薪骗我出国! 到西港绿巨人园区后,做了一个月,我说我不做想回国!想要问我要高额赔付,没办法,后面安稳在绿巨人做了七个月之后公司说要搬去七星海,我没去,两个月工资没发,高脚让我去去中国城金水园区9栋3楼333办公室做法国刷单,说工资补给我! 后面在中国城做了一个月,我说工资不要了!我要回国!然后联合主管阿木一起给我算1.6万赔付,我当时威胁他!我说要钱没有

14 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC752 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#泰国新闻 中国驻泰使馆提醒赴泰投资经商,这些问题一定要注意 8月13日,中国驻泰国大使馆发布提醒,随着越来越多中国企业和公民到泰国投资、做生意,使馆提醒大家在泰经营一定要依法合规,尤其是公司股权、经营范围、签证工签和员工管理等方面,都不能随意操作。 首先,公司注册和经营必须符合泰国相关规定,该办的审批、许可和登记手续要提前办好。企业股权结构也要规范,不能通过名义股东、虚假出资等方式绕开泰国外资准入规定,更不能拿着一个经营许可去做批准范围以外的业务。 员工用工同样是重点。中国籍和其他外籍员工在泰国工作,要根据实际从事的工作办理对应签证和工作许可,不能没有工签就上班,也不能拿旅游签等不适合工作的身份长期从事经营活动。 即使只是到泰国谈生意、提供技术服务或开展其他商务活动,也要提前弄清楚自己需要办理什么手续,避免因为身份或许可问题影响后续经营。 使馆还提醒中资企业,进入泰国市场后不能只顾做自己的生意,也要加强和泰国本地企业

14 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC5 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:金边《城际酒店》黑心商家,还是华住会旗下的,专门逮着中国人坑。避雷,真的避雷!只要是中国人,都离这个酒店远一点。 在这个酒店里住了10天,枕套上有污渍,要赔90美金,完全就是漫天要价。 第一天的时候,朋友来找我玩,他抽烟的时候把烟灰缸打翻了,弄到了被子上还有床单上。我叫来了前台工作人员,赔了30美金,很合理。毕竟弄脏了,清洗也麻烦。 然后住了两天以后,玻璃自爆了。自爆的时候,我立马叫来了工作人员保护现场,担心最后赖到我身上。结果还是要赔钱。 一开始,玻璃门要赔500美金,最后谈下来赔了300美金。 最可恨的是,我叫打扫房间的人来打扫卫生,他看到枕头套上有一点点污渍,都没有渗透到枕芯里面。可能就是在房间里吃东西的时候,不小心抹了一滴油上去,而且颜色很淡,不仔细看根本都看不到。 结果那个打扫房间的人立马叫前台过来,跟我说枕套上面有污渍,要我赔90美金。 一天的房费才80美金,一个枕套他敢要90美金,是想钱想

14 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC746 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#印尼新闻 印尼海关8月13日公布,雅加达苏加诺—哈达国际机场连续破获两起黄金走私案,共查获23.793公斤黄金,价值约630亿印尼盾。 第一起发生在3号航站楼。7名中国籍旅客准备搭机前往香港,检查人员先从其中一人的行李中发现异常,随后对同行人员进一步检查。 结果发现,这批人藏黄金的方式很多,有人绑在身上,有人藏进改装内衣,还有人直接塞进人体腔道,试图躲过机场检查。 执法人员最终从7人身上查出41块黄金,总重17.436公斤,价值约460亿印尼盾。检测结果显示,这批黄金纯度达到99.99%。 不到24小时,机场又查出另一条运金路线。 这一次,一名机场地勤人员利用员工通道和行李装卸区域,帮助黄金绕过普通旅客的安检流程,再转交给一名准备飞往迪拜的印尼籍旅客。 执法人员随后将该旅客拦下,从其背包和行李箱内查出7块金条,总重6.357公斤,价值约170亿印尼盾。 两起案件合计查获23.793公斤黄金,价值约630亿印尼盾

14 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#网友曝光:这个杂种叫阿阳,人现在在特区,表面称兄道弟,背地阴险狡诈,自以为是,喜欢耍点小聪明!自己老家六七个兄弟跟着他一年多,前段时间在缅甸被抓后,快要饿死在监狱里面都没有打过一分钱,还有两个是未成年都给叫出来,出事了直接抛弃不管,公司那段时间公司快倒闭了,他倒好直接带着几个他认为可以保他退路的人跑到特区想继续开工,想在特内做军包,国内色敲,别开工,开工就举报你个杂种!他还有两个村里的弟弟当时被冲时在外面没被抓,现在他两个弟弟也被他抛弃被拿去抵债了,他弟弟问他要个烟钱都不给,过的狗都不如,他自己在特区天天骗人签单玩包厢,坑蒙拐骗,别人买药的几百块钱都坑!你也就这个出息了! 我前脚刚出发回国,你后脚就去找我别人套我照片,表面挺像个人的,从柬埔寨开始多照顾你,你这个杂种一声不吭,就想害我 🕑#广告赞助商 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 🫥🫥

14 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC589 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#西港热线:092 557 117 西哈努克省政府谨此通知公众及全体公民,如有任何关于公共服务、安全和公共秩序方面的问题或信息需要提供,特别是举报网络诈骗,请拨打热线电话:092 557 117。 🕑#广告赞助商 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥😁🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 jinbei199.cc 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮 xh8113.cc ✅订阅安危头条新闻 🎙 https://t.me/+ME6ukmJPbD9jZmVh ✅安危头条新闻胖胖:@syxw01 Ⓜ️ ✅频道互推

14 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC586 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【7T.COM】全球公认最稳! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀380亿U出款见证,持续为用户提供稳定可靠体验 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀行业领先出款效率,58秒见证极速服务体验。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 持续稳定增长,都是各位老板的信任见证。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 实力积累,赢得行业各老板的认可。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 每月千万美金投入,致力打造行业品牌标杆。 😀😀😀😀:【7T.COM】 😀😀😀😀:【官方飞投】 😀😀😀😀:【@uuu7t】 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

14 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC5 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#网友曝光:此人:张丁 这诈骗犯,山东人,这个人来长期各个公司玩仙人跳,踩公司红线,收集客户资料对公司进行威胁诈骗!!具体情况:此人来公司1个多月,说家境不好,自己离异,家里人在透析很需要钱,天天自己加班,看他为人老实,博取大家的同情心,大家工作当中都很照顾他,处处关心他,结果换来的是这种收获,真没有想到的是一点职业道德底线都没有,这种人是在国外团队作案,专门做敲诈勒索。各公司这种诈骗犯,小人一定要注意防范,擦亮你的眼睛,千万不要在被这种小人敲诈,不然损失会很大,这种败类迟早会死得很惨,暂用大家一点资源。 🕑#广告赞助商 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥😁🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 jinbei199.cc 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮 xh8113.cc ✅订阅安危头条新闻 🎙 https://t.me/

14 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#国内新闻 ⚠️突发!湖南杨梅山煤矿发生煤与瓦斯突出事故😱 湖南娄底涟源杨梅山煤矿突发重大险情!井下发生煤与瓦斯突出事故❗️ 事发时 52 人下井,44 人顺利升井,最初 7 人失联! 最新消息:失联人员里 2 人成功升井,正在紧急抢救 其余人员搜救争分夺秒进行中! #湖南杨梅山煤矿事故 #煤矿瓦斯突出 🕑#广告赞助商 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥😁🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 jinbei199.cc 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮 xh8113.cc ✅订阅安危头条新闻 🎙 https://t.me/+ME6ukmJPbD9jZmVh ✅安危头条新闻胖胖:@syxw01 Ⓜ️ ✅频道互推

14 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC720 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#群友,柬埔寨辗转三佛塔,现状惨不忍睹:星链封锁,全网瘫痪,整个园区彻底停摆。 负责人直接摆烂,丢下员工不管,没赚到一分收益,被困异地,无处可去。别看三佛塔暂时安稳,断网已经掐死所有灰色产业,周边大量公司解散跑路。 现在东南亚各国出台严苛反电诈法案,国内跨境打击从未松懈,灰产早已没有任何生存空间。不管是网赌、电诈、洗钱,各类灰色行当,全是违法犯罪。留在境外,随时面临当地重刑;回国,也要依法追责。哪怕没开单、没获利,长期滞留窝点,一样要判刑。 海外高薪灰产全是陷阱,这条路早已彻底封死,及时回头才是唯一出路。 🕑#广告赞助商 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥😁🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 jinbei199.cc 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮 xh8113.cc ✅订阅安危头条新闻 🎙 https://t.

14 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC572 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

#波贝当局开展网络诈骗打击行动居民目击可疑人员转移电脑设备 据当地居民消息,8月14日晚,柬埔寨班迭棉吉省波贝市奥克罗夫桑卡特萨马基棉吉村附近,当局持续开展针对网络诈骗活动的打击行动。 行动期间,有居民发现部分人员驾驶私家车辆转移大量电脑设备以及疑似用于网络诈骗活动的电子器材。由于现场人员未公开身份,居民表示无法确认这些人员究竟是警方执法人员,还是民防相关人员。 目前,关于此次行动的具体部门、涉及人员数量以及现场查扣情况,尚未有官方进一步通报。当地居民表示,希望有关部门能够及时公布调查结果,避免信息不透明引发外界猜测。 PS:估计充值成功一部分🤣 🕑#广告赞助商 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥😁🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 jinbei199.cc 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮 xh8113.cc

Showing the 12 most recent of 230 posts we hold for @syxw5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 86,281 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“◉东南亚中文新闻” (@syxw5), 49,666 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syxw5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.