Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

طلا باز/talabaz

@talabaz

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,709subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002729375864
TypeChannel
Username@talabaz
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/talabaz

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

4,440 average views per post against 3,709 subscribers — an engagement rate of 119.8%. Across the 12,155 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.73% and 23.7%, with a median of 12.3%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled53,320
Mature posts only119.8% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers3,709 measured 11 August 2026
Cohortb3162:fas · 12,155 channels · p10 2.57% · p25 5.73% · p50 12.3% · p75 23.7% · p90 40.5%
Position in cohort99.095th percentile · 9.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.08% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

3,7093,7183,713.57 August 2026 — 3,718 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,715 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,709 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,708–3,719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:263,709-6
8 Aug 2026, 18:403,715-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:323,718first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.8%
avg views ÷ 3,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,440
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total53,320
Reactions total1,125
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,617 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,48356.7%
👍91434.9%
👎973.71%
🙏742.83%
👏260.994%
🔥230.879%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,970 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️منفی‌های دلار و طلا فرصت خرید پله‌ای هستند. موج صعودی بعدی دلار قوی‌تر از موج قبلی خواهد بود و با شکست عدد ۱۹۵ قدرت می‌گیرد. چون بازارها خبری شده اند ، نمی‌توان کف مشخصی برای آن‌ها تعیین کرد؛ فقط باید در منفی‌ها، از قیمت فعلی ۱۸۸ تا ۱۷۹، پله‌ای خرید کرد. دنبال کف خریدن نباشید بازار ها به شدت خبری هستند و با هر خبر امکان نوسان شدید است. 🌐 @talabaz

👍6622👎6

6 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,070 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026

در پیام قبلی به جذابیت طلا اشاره شد و حالا طلا از ۴۰۰۰ به ۴۲۶۰ دلار رسیده است. در اصلاح فعلی دلار که بسته به اخبار ممکن است تا ۱۷۹ ادامه یابد، انتظار می‌رود طلا اصلاح کمتری داشته باشد. دلار و طلا فرصت ها خرید پله ای هستند. 🌐 @talabaz

60👍21👎5

26 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈4,390 views112 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️دلار می‌تواند قیمت‌های پایین‌تری هم ببیند، اما به نظرم طلا و نقره کف زده‌اند؛ چون طلا حباب منفی دارد و احتمالاً امشب بازار جهانی هم با گپ مثبت باز می‌شود. در صورت توافق یا پایان جنگ، شاهد صعود طلا و نقره جهانی خواهیم بود. البته در صورت توافق، برای دلار هم در این قیمت‌ها افت خاصی نمی‌بینم؛ اما طلای جهانی می‌تواند رشد خوبی داشته باشد. اونس جهانی طلا در تناژ بسیار سنگین، حوالی ۴۰۰۰ دلار توسط نهاد خاصی در دنیا در حا

👍7028👎12🙏2

26 Jul 2026, 12:43 UTC≈4,120 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️چون احتمال زیادی دارد امشب اونس طلا و نقره با گپ مثبت باز شوند، حرکت طلا و نقره می‌تواند از دلار فاصله بگیرد. طلا و نقره امروز کف زدن. 🌐 @talabaz

43👍16👏7👎3

25 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC≈4,330 views95 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️نهایتا تا ۱۷۸ می تواند پایین بیاد. استفاده کنید از پایین چون بالا بعدی یکم متفاوت خواهد بود. 🌐 @talabaz

70👍20🙏3🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈4,340 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تتر تایم روزانه یکم جا خطری هست باید ۲ روز اینده تکلیف روشن کند اصلاح یا ادامه صعود. 🌐 @talabaz

🙏34👍198

21 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC≈4,830 views141 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️چون دلار روند گرفته، اگر خبر مذاکره بیاید، مثل دفعه قبل سقوط نمی‌کند و اصلاح خیلی نرم‌تر خواهد بود. دفعه قبل روند صعودی قوی نداشت؛ برای همین خبر بد روی آن تأثیر ریزشی قابل‌توجهی گذاشت. حالا که روند صعودی قوی گرفته، اگر خبر خلاف روند بیاید، بیشتر نویز ایجاد می‌کند. فلزات را دریابید؛ به نظرم از دلار بهتر خواهند بود. طلا، نقره و... برگردید به پیام ۷ ماه قبل(پیام ریپلای شده)؛ صریح گفتم نوع معاملات طلا نشان می‌دهد ام

90👍38🔥7🙏6

20 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC≈4,860 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️شکست این سقف فعلاً «فیک» بود و قیمت خیلی سریع دوباره به زیر محدوده سقف برگشت. در پیام قبلی هم گفتم بعید می‌دانم بازار بدون یک استراحت و نفس‌گیری مناسب بتواند مستقیم از این سقف عبور کند. با این حال، دیدگاه من تغییر نکرده: امسال می‌تواند سال پرریسکی برای خالی‌فروشی باشد؛ پس در گرفتن موقعیت‌های فروش، بسیار محتاط باشید. 🌐 @talabaz

54👍26

16 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC≈6,810 views127 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️سقف قبلی دلار محدوده ۱۹۰ هزار تومان است و بعید می‌دانم بدون یک استراحت کوتاه از آن عبور کند. از این محدوده احتمال یک اصلاح محدود وجود دارد و پس از آن می‌تواند دوباره برای شکستن سقف تلاش کند. همچنان تأکید می‌کنم امسال، حتی با احتمال اصلاح، روی دلار و طلا موقعیت فروش نگیرید؛ چون روند اصلی صعودی است و معامله خلاف جهت آن ریسک بالایی دارد. 🌐 @talabaz

👍8439🙏4

15 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC≈5,830 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️از دلار ۱۵۵ هزار تومان تأکید به خرید داشتم. گفتم قیمت را پایین آورده‌اند تا تراستی‌ها ارزهای خانگی را بخرند و شما فقط بخرید. حالا دلار به ۱۸۸ هزار تومان رسیده است. در مسیر اصلاح خواهیم داشت، اما دنبال ریزش سنگین دلار نباشید؛ چون هنوز تقاضای سنگین و انباشته‌شده بازرگانی سیراب نشده است. با ایجاد توافق یا آرامش در کشور، این تقاضا با شدت وارد بازار می‌شود و حتی در صورت توافق نیز اجازه اصلاح سنگین را نمی‌دهد. این رشد

56👍26👎2🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC≈4,980 views101 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️اگر چندتا از معاملاتم روی اونس جهانی طلا را برایتان بفرستم، واقعاً پشم برای هیچ‌کس نمی‌ماند! با اهرم بالا، از همین نوسان‌ها چه سودهایی که نمی‌شود گرفت. 🌐 @talabaz

63👍23👏12🔥3

14 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈4,790 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☑️امروز ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ اخبار تاثیر گذار رو بازار های جهانی خواهیم داشت. منتظر نوسان های قوی اون ساعت باشید. 🌐 @talabaz

61🙏10🔥2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @talabaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 621,956 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“طلا باز/talabaz” (@talabaz), 3,709 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talabaz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.