Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
69 measurements spanning 51 days, net -843. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,199–93,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 69
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 10:20
92,516
+166
18 Sept 2026, 23:00
92,350
no change
18 Sept 2026, 05:59
92,350
-2
16 Sept 2026, 12:41
92,352
-8
16 Sept 2026, 00:59
92,360
-34
14 Sept 2026, 18:17
92,394
-3
14 Sept 2026, 10:39
92,397
-38
13 Sept 2026, 02:18
92,435
no change
12 Sept 2026, 23:58
92,435
-43
11 Sept 2026, 03:19
92,478
no change
11 Sept 2026, 01:42
92,478
-46
8 Sept 2026, 05:36
92,524
-2
8 Sept 2026, 01:40
92,526
-105
5 Sept 2026, 00:39
92,631
no change
4 Sept 2026, 22:57
92,631
-41
3 Sept 2026, 07:54
92,672
no change
3 Sept 2026, 06:26
92,672
-27
2 Sept 2026, 01:56
92,699
no change
2 Sept 2026, 00:05
92,699
-20
1 Sept 2026, 03:43
92,719
first reading
Engagement
140 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.51%
avg views ÷ 92,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,250
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 140 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
140 (27 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
230,580
Reactions total
1,338
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 23:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,610
Videos
≈263
Links
≈1,690
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 14s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,719 reactions across 136 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,635
60.1%
👍
745
27.4%
✍
247
9.08%
❤🔥
25
0.919%
🏆
11
0.405%
🆒
9
0.331%
🥰
9
0.331%
🤨
6
0.221%
🔥
5
0.184%
🤣
5
0.184%
☃
4
0.147%
😭
4
0.147%
💔
2
0.074%
💯
2
0.074%
🗿
2
0.074%
🤷
2
0.074%
⚡
1
0.037%
🐳
1
0.037%
👌
1
0.037%
👏
1
0.037%
2 further kinds
2
0.074%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 140 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,812 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 140 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @englishlanguage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 140 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Threw and through: understanding the distinction
The main event centers on the differences between "threw" and "through." "Threw" is the past tense of the verb "throw," indicating an action completed in the past. For example, "She threw the ball."
On the other hand, "through" functions as a preposition, adverb, or adjective, commonly describing movement from one side or end of something to the other. For instance, …
A newly published list details 100 weak verbs and suggests stronger alternatives for improved clarity in writing. The resource aims to help writers enhance the precision and impact of their language by selecting more specific verbs.
The compilation focuses on commonly used weak verbs and offers concise, stronger options for each. This guidance applies to both creative and academic contexts, allowing authors to conve…
The modal verbs “can” and “could” are used to express ability and possibility.
“Can” is used when referring to a present ability or a situation that is possible now.
“Could” refers to past abilities or to suggest something is possible under certain conditions, as well as to make polite requests.
Both “can” and “could” are commonly employed in questions and negative statements to discuss what is or was possible.
A…
Present tense is used to describe actions happening now, habitual events, or universal truths. It forms a base for expressing facts, routines, and current activities. Present tense typically uses the base form of the verb for most subjects, with an added “-s” or “-es” form for third-person singular subjects. It is commonly found in instructions, news reports, and descriptions of ongoing situations. This tense establi…
The term “flea market” is believed to have originated due to the presence of actual fleas at such markets. Early outdoor markets often featured secondhand goods, which sometimes harbored pests, leading to the association with fleas.
Historical records indicate that makeshift markets, particularly those dealing in used clothing and furniture, were susceptible to flea infestations. As a result, the name “flea market” …
Common English idioms and their meanings
Idioms are widely used expressions whose meanings are not always clear from the individual words. For example, “break the ice” means to initiate conversation in a social setting, while “spill the beans” refers to revealing secret information.
Other frequent examples include “hit the nail on the head,” signifying that someone is exactly right, and “under the weather,” describ…
The terms "pertinent" and "relevant" are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings.
"Pertinent" refers to something that directly applies to the matter at hand and has a significant bearing on the issue. This term is often used in legal or formal contexts to emphasize a strong connection.
"Relevant," on the other hand, describes information that relates to the topic but may not be directly decisiv…
A pronoun is a word used as a substitute for a noun in a sentence.
Pronouns help avoid repetition by standing in for names of people, places, objects, or ideas. Common examples include “he,” “she,” “it,” “they,” and “we.”
There are several types of pronouns such as personal, possessive, reflexive, relative, and demonstrative. Each type serves a specific grammatical function in a sentence.
Correct use of pronouns e…
A curated list of 100 concise words has been compiled to assist in expressing ideas clearly and efficiently. This selection is intended to help individuals communicate with precision and brevity across various contexts.
Each word on the list has been chosen for its ability to convey meaning effectively, reducing the need for lengthy descriptions. Such vocabulary supports clear and direct communication.
These words …
The core distinction between "Miss," "Mrs.," "Ms.," and "Mr." relates to gender and marital status.
"Miss" is used for an unmarried woman. "Mrs." identifies a married woman. "Ms." is applied to a woman regardless of whether she is married. "Mr." is used for men without specifying marital status.
These forms of address indicate social titles rather than job titles or qualifications. They are commonly used in formal …
👍12❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @englishlanguage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Lifehacks — Ideas, Tips & Lifestyle @lifehacksadvice · 24,216 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
BBC Learning English @English_BBC_Learning · 65,720 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
🇰🇷 Korean Language | 한국 🇰🇷 @korean_language_kpop_dorama · 63,809 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
English @English_IBPS_PO_Clerk_SSC_CGL_GK · 184,033 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
English Grammar IELTS TOEFL @English_Grammar_IELTS_TOEFL · 277,464 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
English Grammar - IELTS & PTE @learn_en_grammar · 31,635 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
Saya Sithu Htet @essentialSayaSithuHtet · 32,410 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 7 September 2026
Improve Your English🌙 @Ingliztiliuzz · 92,482 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
English Language @English_Language_IELTS_TOEFL · 128,192 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
English Stories Moral Novels @StoryPage · 133,029 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
BBC Learning English @bbcLEn · 28,942 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
America 🇺🇸 News & Politics @america · 37,575 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
Robots & Art — AI Images and Pictures @images024 · 56,123 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
English Proverbs and Sayings @English_Proverbs_Sayings_Quotes · 34,215 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
English Collocations @English_Collocations_Adjectives · 38,792 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
English language @BritishEnglishforall · 331,538 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
English Phrasal Verbs @PhrasalCards · 113,112 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Learn English Grammar | Language @Grammar6 · 126,372 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@tourism @journeys · 25,074 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026
English Vocabulary | Vocabularies @Vocabulix · 131,129 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Espresso English @EspressoEnglish · 38,497 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
English Phrases & Expressions @English_phrases_Expressions_verb · 47,245 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Daily English Conversations Dialogs @DaytoDayEnglish · 99,217 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
The Daily Stats @dailystats · 30,755 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Language & Grammar” (@englishlanguage), 92,516 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishlanguage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.