Channel
@englishlanguage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
93,195subscribers
-164 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001409414787 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @englis @englishlanguage |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/englishlanguage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 93,195 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 93,193 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 93,210 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 93,213 | -29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 93,242 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 93,246 | -23 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 93,269 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 93,277 | -35 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 93,312 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 93,311 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 93,309 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 93,309 | -27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 93,336 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 93,336 | -23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 93,359 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 93,359 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 93,359 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 120,490 |
| Reactions total | 748 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
655 reactions across 32 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 458 | 69.9% | |
| 👍 | 107 | 16.3% | |
| ✍ | 67 | 10.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 1.07% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 0.611% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.611% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.458% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.458% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.153% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 748reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The core event: The phrase “in the nick of time” once had a specific historical meaning. Originally, “in the nick of time” referred to a critical, exact moment. The “nick” meant a precise mark or notch, used to record or measure something important at a particular point. Over time, the phrase evolved, becoming associated with something happening at the last possible instant. The original use focused on accuracy and …
❤4👍3
Enquire and inquire: differences in usage The terms “enquire” and “inquire” are often interchangeable, but there are regional preferences and subtle distinctions. In British English, “enquire” is usually used for general questions, while “inquire” often relates to formal investigations. In American English, “inquire” is favored in both contexts, and “enquire” is rarely used. Both verbs stem from the same Latin root…
❤4👍2
🏴 Our channels
👍7
🏴 Our channels
👍7
The phrase “in the long run” describes the idea of considering outcomes or effects over an extended period, rather than focusing on immediate results. This expression traces its roots to economic and philosophical discussions, where it is used to emphasize patience and the eventual consequences of actions or policies. Historically, the phrase gained prominence in the context of economic theory, often attributed to a…
❤10✍8👍1
Correct usage of “at,” “on,” and “in” for time and place The prepositions “at,” “on,” and “in” have specific uses when referring to time and location. “At” is typically used for precise times or specific places. Examples: at 5 p.m., at the door. “On” applies to days and dates, as well as surfaces. Examples: on Monday, on the table. “In” is used with months, years, longer periods, and enclosed spaces. Examples: in…
❤6🥰4👍3✍2❤🔥1
🏴 Our channels
❤16👍5❤🔥1
The phrase “an ill wind blows nobody any good” refers to the idea that even negative events can sometimes have positive outcomes for someone. Historically, this English proverb dates back several centuries and appears in various forms throughout literature. Its meaning centers on the notion that circumstances harmful to many may still be advantageous to a few. The origin of the phrase can be traced to early English w…
❤17👍4
A preposition is a part of speech that indicates the relationship between words in a sentence. It typically shows direction, location, time, or method. Common examples include “in,” “on,” “at,” “by,” “with,” and “about.” Prepositions are often followed by a noun or pronoun to complete the phrase. Accurate use of prepositions ensures clarity and coherence in written and spoken English. 🏴 Our channels
❤20👍4✍1
🏴 Our channels
❤18👍3❤🔥1🐳1
The phrase "in the black" is used to indicate that a business or organization is profitable. This expression dates back to times when accountants used black ink to record positive financial results, distinguishing them from losses, which were marked in red ink. Being "in the black" means earning more than is spent, resulting in a profit on financial statements. It is a common term in financial reporting and business…
❤19✍3👍3🔥2
🏴 Our channels
❤20👍3✍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @englishlanguage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Language & Grammar” (@englishlanguage), 93,195 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishlanguage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.