Channel
@ChatGPT_Gemini_Prompts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,520subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020698612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChatGPT_Gemini_Prompts |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChatGPT_Gemini_Prompts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 5,520 | -17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 5,537 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 5,532 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 5,531 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 5,531 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,012 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
68 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 52 | 76.5% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 17.6% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Quiet confidence never goes out of style GPT image 2 on Chatgpt Prompt:Create a close-up black-and-white high-fashion editorial portrait using the uploaded photo as the facial identity reference. Preserve the exact facial structure, hairstyle, skin texture, proportions, expression, and overall likeness from the uploaded image. Keep the same sporty wraparound dark sunglasses with reflective lenses and the same overs…
🔥2
Just me, my cart, and bad financial decisions GPT image 2 on chatgpt Prompt: Young woman pushing shopping cart filled with snack bags and water bottles in brightly lit supermarket aisle at night, wearing oversized graphic t-shirt, sunglasses, bracelet on wrist, leaning forward over cart handle with playful kissing face expression toward camera, shelves stocked with bottles and products behind. candid, raw, spontane…
🔥4🆒1
GPT Image 2 On ChatGPT Prompt: An illustration featuring delicate watercolors and rich ink, depicting a young Korean woman in her 20s traveling in New York, standing on a ferry deck with the Statue of Liberty rising in the distance behind her. She holds the railing with one hand, her long hair and light trench coat lifted by the harbor breeze, looking up with a bright delighted smile. A small crossbody bag and a fo…
🔥7
My personality depends on the day and the vibe Seedream 5.0 Prompt : [SUBJECT], ultra realistic 3D render, smooth inflated glossy plastic material, soft pillowy balloon like contours, subtle stitched panel seams and paneling, high specular highlights, clean reflections, soft contact shadows, designer collectible toy aesthetic, cute proportions, premium polished finish, floating centered, plain light gray studio back…
👌2🔥2
Just me, my mirror, and a little midnight mood Seedream 2 Prompt:Use photo uploaded do not alter face. Using the image given, create A photo of a young girl sitting elegantly on the floor, infront of a big trending mirror in a soft afternoon golden hour, her left hand touching her cheek gracefullt while her right hand taking herself a mirror-selfie using her Iphone 17 pro max. The light from the sunset from the win…
🔥3👌2
Made with ChatGPT Prompt: Use the uploaded reference image as the strict appearance reference. Preserve the same hairstyle, face shape, skin tone, makeup style, sunglasses design, and overall fashion aesthetic. Create an ultra-realistic fashion editorial portrait of a young woman with tousled short dark hair, wearing round red-tinted sunglasses, a red-and-black tartan coat, delicate layered gold necklaces, and subt…
🔥4👌1🆒1
GPT image 2 on Chatgpt Prompt: A raw, authentic smartphone photo with a Pinterest-inspired aesthetic, captured during golden hour. No CGI, no AI-generated look, and no excessive retouching. Beautiful, healthy, smooth skin with realistic pores and natural skin texture. Shot from an extremely low angle (looking up), with the viewer's gaze directed toward the model and the sky. The woman stands centered in the frame ag…
👌3🔥3
Create a mischievous doodle shadow to your image using GPT image 2 Prompt: A mischievous doodle shadow mimics the character with exaggerated funny poses while she stands still wearing modern trendy clothes. The shadow appears hand-drawn, playful, and full of personality, creating a humorous contrast with the calm subject. She wears a fashionable oversized shirt, cargo pants, and sneakers. Her facial expression is co…
🔥6👏1
Chatgpt image 2 Prompt: Use the uploaded photo as the exact identity reference. Keep the face, skin tone, hairstyle, accessories, and outfit exactly the same. Create a vertical full-body image of the real person standing beside their ink-twin doodle. The real person should look photorealistic with a playful, slightly embarrassed expression and a natural pose. The ink twin should be a rough black charcoal sketch on …
🔥5👌1🆒1
GPT Image 2 On ChatGPT Prompt: Draw a simple hand-drawn doodle of the attached photo, as if it were sketched by a person using a black marker. Use natural marker strokes, slightly wobbly outlines, subtle hand-drawn imperfections, slightly open line endings, and create a warm editorial doodle aesthetic. Avoid clean vector-style graphics and overly polished digital perfection. Keep the illustration simple, airy, flat…
🔥5
Made with ChatGPT Prompt: Minimalist monochrome ink illustration on textured white paper featuring [SUBJECT] with [EXPRESSION] and [POSE]. Surround the figure with abstract handwritten notes, scattered ink marks, and faint diary-like scribbles blending into the background. Use only black ink, delicate pen strokes, organic rough outlines, expressive crosshatching, subtle construction lines, unfinished sketch details…
🔥3
Prompt 👇 Vertical editorial portrait shot on iPhone 17 Pro Max in soft even studio lighting against a plain pale wall corner with gentle shadow. A woman stands angled into the corner, one hand pressed flat against the wall, chin lifted with a poised confident gaze toward the lens. Her hair is long and softly waved, centre-parted, falling over the shoulders. She wears a dramatic sculptural polished gold winged breast…
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ChatGPT_Gemini_Prompts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 26,837 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Smart Life with AI” (@ChatGPT_Gemini_Prompts), 5,520 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChatGPT_Gemini_Prompts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.