Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

English Stories Moral Novels

@StoryPage

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

133,113subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001103824593
TypeChannel
Username@StoryPage
Created1 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/StoryPage

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

133,097133,156133,126.56 August 2026 — 133,143 subscribers6 August 2026 — 133,143 subscribers6 August 2026 — 133,148 subscribers6 August 2026 — 133,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 133,153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 133,134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 133,113 subscribers10 August 2026 — 133,114 subscribers11 August 2026 — 133,097 subscribers12 August 2026 — 133,113 subscribers133,1136 August 202612 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133,088–133,165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:54133,113+16
11 Aug 2026, 18:22133,097-17
10 Aug 2026, 20:17133,114+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:22133,113-21
8 Aug 2026, 19:45133,134-19
7 Aug 2026, 21:55133,153-3
6 Aug 2026, 23:26133,156+8
6 Aug 2026, 03:00133,148+5
6 Aug 2026, 01:31133,143no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:36133,143first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14h 23m
Average length
57m 36s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,202 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
86071.5%
👍988.15%
🔥685.66%
🥰604.99%
😈201.66%
🤔191.58%
👏151.25%
😁141.16%
❤‍🔥100.832%
🖕90.749%
👎70.582%
40.333%
🍓40.333%
👨‍💻40.333%
😐40.333%
30.25%
🙏20.166%
👀10.083%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 22:43 UTC≈24,900 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

What kind of stories do you like?

  1. Visual17%
  2. Text32%
  3. Video35%
  4. Audio23%
  5. All options32%

The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

73👍27🔥11❤‍🔥10🍓3

5 Jul 2026, 22:38 UTC≈22,800 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Their dream was about to become a nightmare, the vampire thought. He burst through the door and stood there with a cruel expression, showing his sharp teeth. The couple screamed and held each other in terrified silence. The vampire smelled the tension and tasted the fear. This was how he liked it. Fear made the blood even sweeter. 'There's my wallet! On the table, there! Take it!' said David. 'Take anything you want

54😁6🔥3👍1

5 Jul 2026, 22:38 UTC≈20,300 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bad blood – B2/C1 When a vampire visits a young couple in love, can they – and their love – survive? David and Emma gazed at each other across the table. The young couple were content: the meal was delicious, the candlelight was soft and the music captured the moment perfectly. David looked at Emma's beautiful smile. All the pain of his last break-up, all his doubts and fears about love melted away. His hand reache

49👍1

5 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC≈17,000 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

When a vampire visits a young couple in love, can they – and their love – survive?

16

20 Aug 2025, 19:04 UTC≈148,000 views295 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Wessex | Learn English through Story ⭐ Level 3 - Stories english | Improve your English ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

202👍25🥰16🔥15🤔11😁8🖕7👏5

20 Aug 2025, 08:47 UTC≈135,000 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Dangerous Drive | Learn English through Story ⭐ Stories english | Improve your English ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

72👍12🤔8👏5🔥4😈4👎3👨‍💻3

19 Aug 2025, 20:27 UTC≈121,000 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Mike Tyson | Learn English through Story ⭐ Level 3 - Stories english | Improve your English ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

61🥰5👏3😈3👍2🔥2

19 Aug 2025, 07:16 UTC≈115,000 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Learn English through story 🍀 level 7 🍀 Fantastic Mr Fox ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

41🥰5👍4🔥3🙏2😈1

18 Aug 2025, 19:48 UTC≈84,900 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Learn English through story 🍀 level ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

24🔥6👍4🥰3😈1

17 Aug 2025, 19:19 UTC≈72,400 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

interesting story in English 🔥 Helen Keller 🔥 story in English with Narrative Story ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

31🥰7👍4👨‍💻1🔥1😈1

17 Aug 2025, 09:31 UTC≈62,400 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Angel of the Odd | GRADED READER | INTERESTING STORY | LEARN ENGLISH THROUGH A BEAUTIFUL STORY ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

29🥰4🔥3👎1😈1

16 Aug 2025, 20:45 UTC≈54,500 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Learn English through story 🍀 level 2 🍀 A Young Heiress ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ➠@PhrasalCards ➠@SlangWords ➠@IdiomsLand ➠@Vocabulix ➠@GrammarCards ➠@EnglishGate ➠@StoryPage

21🔥5👍4👏1🥰1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StoryPage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jul 2026, 22:43 UTCAnonymous Poll2,140 voters approx.

What kind of stories do you like?

  1. Visual17%
  2. Text32%
  3. Video35%
  4. Audio23%
  5. All options32%

The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 5 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,879 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Learn English Idioms Language
@Idiomsland · 169,614
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
English Grammar IELTS TOEFL
@English_Grammar_IELTS_TOEFL · 281,067
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“English Stories Moral Novels” (@StoryPage), 133,113 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StoryPage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.