Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ебанутый Днепр 🇺🇦

@ebanutiy_dnepr

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,806subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001282078842
TypeChannel
Username@ebanutiy_dnepr
DescriptionВся жесть Днепра в нашем телеграме 📬 Прислать нам свою новость - @ebanutiydnepr_bot 🤘Ссылка для приглашения друзей - https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAExq-HrSqQ8t1qPPDQ 💰По рекламе писать: @ebdp_admin 🌇 Мы в инстаграме - https://instagram.com/ebanutiy_dne
Created19 February 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ebanutiy_dnepr

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ebanutiy_dnepr/20927 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC@eto_dnepr/174264 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@ebanutiy_dnepr/20928 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC@eto_dnepr/174274 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@ebanutiy_dnepr/20929 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC@eto_dnepr/174284 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@ebanutiy_dnepr/20930 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC@eto_dnepr/174294 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@ebanutiy_dnepr/20934 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC@eto_dnepr/174335 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@ebanutiy_dnepr/20943 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC@eto_dnepr/174426 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@eto_dnepr16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (160)
@typical_dnepr16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@typical_dnepr (160)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @typical_dnepr. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

20,80620,83320,819.56 August 2026 — 20,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,833 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,831 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,825 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,824 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,815 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,806 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,802–20,837 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:5220,806-9
11 Aug 2026, 06:5220,815-6
10 Aug 2026, 07:3620,821-3
9 Aug 2026, 08:5120,824-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:3720,825-6
7 Aug 2026, 08:3020,831-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:5120,833no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4220,833first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 20,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,090
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.412%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held46 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total188,050
Reactions total775
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,300
Videos
5,340
Links
3,420

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

775 reactions across 46 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬22028.4%
🤡9712.5%
😡9512.3%
😢759.68%
👍698.90%
😁688.77%
607.74%
💩283.61%
😱253.23%
🔥121.55%
👏101.29%
🤔60.774%
🥰60.774%
🤯30.387%
🤩10.129%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 775reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,630 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Через ревнощі вдарив гостя ножем: дніпрянин сяде на 8 років за ґрати. Під час сварки через жінку 40-річний господар квартири схопив ніж і вдарив 39-річного гостя в живіт. Чоловік отримав тяжкі травми та потрапив до лікарні.

🤬7😢31

12 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,540 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📞Поліція накрила 94 шахрайські call-центри у Дніпрі та по всій Україні Нацполіція провела 411 обшуків по всій країні та припинила діяльність 94 call-центрів. У звичайних офісах правоохоронці виявили майже 1800 обладнаних робочих місць. 26 фігурантам вже повідомили про підозру. Зловмисники працювали за різними схемами: телефонували від імені банків про «блокування рахунків», пропонували фальшиві інвестиції у криптов

👍10😁81🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,820 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вибух у квартирі на 6-му поверсі багатоповерхівки (ж/м Ломівський).

😢131

12 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈3,300 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У Дніпрі мужик через Інтернет завантажував та розповсюджував дитячу порнографію 32-річний дніпрянин у квітні 2026 року через Інтернет завантажив та зберігав понад 7 тисяч фотофайлів і понад 3 тисячі відеофайлів, що містять дитячу порнографію. Потім за допомогою спеціального програмного забезпечення деякі з цих файлів він розповсюджував серед інших користувачів мережі Інтернет. Наразі йому обрано запобіжний захід у

🤬13👍1🤔1

11 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈4,840 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🙃Порноактора засуджено у Дніпрі: модель «Onlyfans» має заплатити 24 тис грн державним експертам, які оцінювали його творчість, — місцеві ЗМІ. Також чоловіку призначено 2 роки праці у виправному центрі

🤡45😁154

11 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈4,580 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ворог атакував Дніпровський район,- ОВА Попередньо, минулося без постраждалих.

😢5

11 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC≈4,720 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🛵 Реактивний БпЛА на Дніпро з півдня - ПС

🤬81

11 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈5,150 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Звуки вибухів у Дніпрі – робота сил ППО, – ОВА

👍13

11 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC≈4,970 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Момент вечірньої ДТП на Набережній Перемоги, де мотоцикл врізався у кросовер: постраждала пасажирка мотоцикла

🤬93🥰2😱2😢1

11 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC≈4,590 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🛵 Реактивний БпЛА на Дніпро з півдня! - ПС

🤬9🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @ebanutiy_dnepr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Где повестки Днепр?
@agendaDnepr · 309,262
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
Включатель Днепр⚡️
@vklyuchatel_dnepr_svet · 180,922
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
‼️СИРЕНА. ДНІПРО‼️
@sirena_dp · 233,207
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
ХДніпро 🇺🇦
@hyevuy_dnepr · 520,473
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 August 2026
Дніпро ОПЕРАТИВНИЙ 🇺🇦
@dneproperatyv · 186,185
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Хуевый Днепр | Дніпро
@huevyi_dnepr · 166,258
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Дніпро Оперативний 🇺🇦| Війна
@dnepr_operativ · 315,817
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Труха⚡️Дніпро | Новини
@truexadnepr · 361,418
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
НУ І ДНІПРО! 🇺🇦
@ny_i_dnipro · 269,587
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ебанутый Днепр 🇺🇦” (@ebanutiy_dnepr), 20,806 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebanutiy_dnepr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.