Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РЕЙД | 413 полк СБС

@raid_413

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,704subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810865726
TypeChannel
Username@raid_413
DescriptionFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/raid.413 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/raid.413 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@raid_413 X: https://x.com/413_raid Threads: https://www.threads.com/@raid.413 Набір в «РЕЙД»: https://forms.gle/tHuWVLd23P7L7a41A
Created22 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/raid_413

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

18,500 average views per post against 7,704 subscribers — an engagement rate of 240.5%. Across the 2,678 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 13.7% and 38.9%, with a median of 23.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured26 of 26 published in the window (1 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled481,718
Mature posts only259.9% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers7,704 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb3162:ukr · 2,678 channels · p10 7.34% · p25 13.7% · p50 23.2% · p75 38.9% · p90 59.6%
Position in cohort99.216th percentile · 10.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.072% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageUkrainian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,6477,7047,675.56 August 2026 — 7,647 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,647 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,656 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,678 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,704 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,638–7,713 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:187,704+26
9 Aug 2026, 07:127,678+22
6 Aug 2026, 09:307,656+9
6 Aug 2026, 03:067,647no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:527,647first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
240.5%
avg views ÷ 7,704 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,500
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.544%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total481,718
Reactions total2,620
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,080
Videos
550
Links
865

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 19s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,620 reactions across 26 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥95336.4%
90934.7%
👍39515.1%
❤‍🔥1214.62%
🫡1174.47%
🙏451.72%
👏240.916%
🤝180.687%
🤣100.382%
🥰60.229%
💯40.153%
🤔30.115%
20.076%
🐳20.076%
😍20.076%
😐20.076%
🍌10.038%
🏆10.038%
😎10.038%
😴10.038%
3 further kinds30.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,620reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC808 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

«Я був штурмовиком. Був у розвідці. Довелося попробувати все. Я був молодим, тому приходилося вчитися вдвічі більше» Наш побратим Стафф на цій війні від самого її початку – з 2014-го. У 18 років прийшов у Добровольчий український корпус «Правий сектор». Воював у Пісках, ДАПі, на шахті «Бутівка» біля Авдіївки. Каже, що тоді було по-іншому: цікаво і романтично. З перших днів великого вторгнення – в ССО. А зараз Стафф

36👍13👏2🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈19,300 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Яких ще емодзі бракує для нормального спілкування?☝️

40🔥20😐2

12 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,170 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🛡 У «Рейді» ми дбаємо про безпеку наших людей. Тому створили курс «Дроноцид», на якому навчаємо військовослужбовців полку протидіяти FPV-дронам. Триденна програма включає опанування роботи з помповими та напівавтоматичними рушницями 12 калібру: • в статиці та динаміці; • стрільбу по імітаторах FPV й реальних дронах; • із нестабільних положень та в умовах обмеженої видимості. Це те, що рятує життя під час місій. А

🔥36👍10🙏1

11 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈51,200 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Довелося піти в СЗЧ? Повертайся в «Рейд»! Чому до нас? Пояснює наш побратим Кум ☝️ ВАЖЛИВО! Якщо твій статус СЗЧ був зафіксований до 12 червня 2026 року включно, обирай «Рейд»! Спрощена процедура діє до 20 вересня. Подавай рапорт через Армія+ або заповнюй анкету на https://raid.army/ 🔥 У полку «Рейд» дбають про людей.

👍50🔥85🙏1

11 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,420 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

❓ Як загасити літій-іонний акумулятор дрона? Займання може раптово статися від удару, через коротке замикання або перегрів під час заряджання. При цьому в акумуляторі може виникнути самопідтримувана хімічна реакція, а температура сягати 1100 °C. Порошковий або вуглекислотний вогнегасник може збити полум’я, але не обов’язково зупинить сам процес. Для таких випадків використовують водо-пінні вогнегасники зі спеціаль

👍4613🤔2🙉1

10 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,540 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Друже, повертайся із СЗЧ у «Рейд»! Ми підготували інструкцію, як це зробити через Армія+. Багато бійців у СЗЧ – гарні фахівці та сумлінні воїни. І ми впевнені, що вони можуть посилити наш полк. Приходь до нас та обери, чим будеш займатися. Серед бойових і тилових вакансій у «Рейді» точно є та, що відповідає твоїм навичкам і досвіду. Ми гарантуємо: ✅ швидкий розгляд заявки та допомогу з вибором посади; ✅ відсутніс

👍3821🙏3🔥1🤣1

10 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,460 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💥 11 російських суден уразили оператори полку «Рейд» минулого тижня! Загалом на їхньому рахунку 354 ураження ворожих об'єктів. Серед них – один комплекс ППО і три РЛС, танк та 30 автомобілів. Також підтверджено ураження 40 окупантів. 🛢 Крім цього оператори «Рейду» разом із побратимами з інших підрозділів завдали глибинного удару по Ярославському нафтопереробному заводу, що входить до п'ятірки найбільших НПЗ Росії.

🔥6223👍2🙏2

10 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,250 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @usf_armyVideo

Сили безпілотних систем уразили великий нафтопереробний комплекс у Нижньокамську Оператори 1-го окремого центру та 413-го полку «Рейд» у взаємодії з іншими складовими Сил оборони уразили НПЗ «ТАНЕКО», розташований у Нижньокамську, Республіка Татарстан. Підприємство є одним із ключових активів «Татнефти» у сфері нафтопереробки. Його створили як масштабний комплекс нафтопереробних і нафтохімічних виробництв та ввели в

🔥5814🫡4👍1🙏1

9 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,610 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @usf_armyPhoto

Оператори СБС готують БпЛА «Shark» до вильоту. Екіпаж 413-го полку «Рейд», який виконує завдання з розвідки та коригування вогню, поєднує бійців із піхотним досвідом найважчих боїв та молодих військовослужбовців, які пройшли вишколи, здобули бойовий досвід і стали професіоналами. Саме в такій співпраці та взаємообміні досвідом народжуються нові підходи й високі результати. Результати, які противник відчуває на соб

🔥7327🫡2🙏2🤣1

9 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,710 views235 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вітаємо командувача Сил безпілотних систем Роберта «Мадяра» Бровді з Днем народження! Бажаємо міцного здоров'я, непохитної волі та бойової удачі! Нехай Сили безпілотних систем множать перемоги, а Москва впаде! 🔥 Бити, а не нити!⁩

148🫡62👍20🤝3🍌1🙏1

9 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC≈1,770 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Знову? Знову! 😎

🔥6832🙏4❤‍🔥3🤯1😎1

8 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈2,010 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

O kurwa! Чому поляки нападають на українців? Три мільйони українських мігрантів створюють для Польщі величезний ВВП. Це вигідно польській владі. Водночас польська влада підігрує польській національній образі та піднімає складні питання історії, наслідком чого є напади на українців. ❓ Чому так відбувається? І як бути українським чоловікам, яким неприємно очікувати агресії від «польського пана»? Говоримо про це у н

58🤝15👍7🤣7🙏3💯1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @raid_413. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,500 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РЕЙД | 413 полк СБС” (@raid_413), 7,704 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raid_413.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.