Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

vanbay

@vanbay

5 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

105,428subscribers

-890 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001159086151
TypeChannel
Usernames@riyadhseason @telka @vanbay @vanbay888 @vanbaypromo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vanbay

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

105,428106,318105,8736 August 2026 — 106,318 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,290 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,290 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,255 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,220 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,176 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,123 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,091 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,048 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,048 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,019 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105,999 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105,963 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105,915 subscribers10 August 2026 — 105,913 subscribers10 August 2026 — 105,810 subscribers10 August 2026 — 105,808 subscribers10 August 2026 — 105,795 subscribers10 August 2026 — 105,732 subscribers10 August 2026 — 105,719 subscribers11 August 2026 — 105,672 subscribers11 August 2026 — 105,664 subscribers11 August 2026 — 105,664 subscribers11 August 2026 — 105,578 subscribers11 August 2026 — 105,570 subscribers12 August 2026 — 105,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 105,505 subscribers12 August 2026 — 105,460 subscribers12 August 2026 — 105,448 subscribers12 August 2026 — 105,428 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
35 measurements spanning 6 days, net -890. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,295–106,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:58105,428-20
12 Aug 2026, 18:24105,448-12
12 Aug 2026, 16:04105,460-45
12 Aug 2026, 11:24105,505-8
12 Aug 2026, 09:11105,513-57
11 Aug 2026, 21:03105,570-8
11 Aug 2026, 19:23105,578-86
11 Aug 2026, 12:58105,664no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:35105,664-8
11 Aug 2026, 09:32105,672-47
10 Aug 2026, 23:24105,719-13
10 Aug 2026, 21:43105,732-63
10 Aug 2026, 11:11105,795-13
10 Aug 2026, 07:14105,808-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:05105,810-103
10 Aug 2026, 01:42105,913-2
9 Aug 2026, 22:11105,915-48
9 Aug 2026, 14:16105,963-36
9 Aug 2026, 07:12105,999-20
9 Aug 2026, 05:03106,019first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.58%
avg views ÷ 105,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,050
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.801%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held21 (4 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total72,370
Reactions total580
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,795 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
76342.5%
👍55330.8%
🤣40822.7%
😎181.00%
😢170.947%
🫡160.891%
🐳150.836%
🌚50.279%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,795reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 21 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vanbay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈2,620 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

еще не улучшил😂

🤣33👍16😎81🫡1

11 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈4,470 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣9🌚2🫡2😢21

6 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC≈8,000 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

не прошло и года

🤣5813👍10

4 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈8,060 views90 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

кайф

45👍22🤣15😎3🐳2🌚1🫡1😢1

1 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈10,400 views81 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

надеюсь, рост будет , а пока печально выглядит

🤣51😢1310👍7

21 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC≈14,500 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

респект 👍

🤣5719👍12🐳1

21 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈14,400 views99 reactions22 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

крипту сделали «легальной», но толку нет, так как крипты у меня больше нет

64🤣25👍10

7 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC≈20,800 views111 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

спасибо большое, Palm Beach Pete ставить

👍5040🤣19🐳2

7 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC≈17,700 views132 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

мркт взломали :/ и украли пепки UPD: фейк

76👍26🤣20🫡8🌚2

6 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC≈13,300 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026

в Хельсинки кстати был в 2013 помню, но я думаю сделать тур по этим городам, они вроде похожи

41👍17🐳6

6 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC≈13,000 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, кто то был в Таллине? Красивый город? Я обязательно туда приеду

👍3929🐳4

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @vanbay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 196,911 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vanbay” (@vanbay), 105,428 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanbay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.