Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
44 measurements spanning 96 days, net +3,927. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,359–13,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 14:07
12,883
+567
9 Nov 2026, 04:17
12,316
+704
7 Nov 2026, 21:47
11,612
+64
6 Nov 2026, 20:00
11,548
+288
5 Nov 2026, 20:10
11,260
+67
4 Nov 2026, 23:18
11,193
+4
3 Nov 2026, 19:46
11,189
+5
2 Nov 2026, 16:06
11,184
+12
1 Nov 2026, 12:36
11,172
+1
31 Oct 2026, 14:45
11,171
+13
30 Oct 2026, 17:46
11,158
+8
29 Oct 2026, 18:08
11,150
+4
28 Oct 2026, 17:16
11,146
+8
27 Oct 2026, 16:25
11,138
-2
26 Oct 2026, 13:49
11,140
-1
25 Oct 2026, 11:06
11,141
-2
24 Oct 2026, 14:39
11,143
-5
23 Oct 2026, 13:49
11,148
+1
22 Oct 2026, 12:06
11,147
-6
21 Oct 2026, 05:27
11,153
first reading
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
71.2%
avg views ÷ 12,883 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,170
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
99 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
348,630
Reactions total
3,671
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈641
Videos
≈966
Links
≈1,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 08m
Average length
1m 19s
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,602 reactions across 99 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5460932315637095493
4,982
51.9%
🤣
1,786
18.6%
❤
435
4.53%
custom 6039692395862298176
290
3.02%
🥴
234
2.44%
😢
211
2.20%
🔥
178
1.85%
🏆
140
1.46%
👍
119
1.24%
custom 5239996509281338545
112
1.17%
🫡
109
1.14%
💯
79
0.823%
custom 5240126225883603001
73
0.76%
🍌
71
0.739%
custom 5240346201223603406
68
0.708%
😭
60
0.625%
custom 5413380555154672295
59
0.614%
custom 5204186875853560376
52
0.542%
custom 5472229290806358173
39
0.406%
🗿
39
0.406%
31 further kinds
466
4.85%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,602 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❗️Известный шейх-бекер Андердог вчера поставил по очереди двум зрителям по 400$ на одно число в рулетке, и они оба угадали. Каждый из них вынес по 1 000 000 рублей.
Знаю, Андер такие розыгрыши каждый день делает, но чтобы 2 раза подряд поймали за стрим - подобное не часто видишь.
⚡️ Материалы по теме: Андердог скинул Сясе 3000$ на рулетку, и они угадали выигрышное число. С нюансом.
⭐️Лудильная. Подписаться
❗️Жена стримера Демонфаера пришла в шок от увиденного
Короче, к Демонфаеру зашел шейх-бекер и закинул ему 50к руб. на пару бонусок в слотах. Пацаны чуть раскрутились, потом зашли в слот, купили бонуску за 50к руб, выиграли какую-то безумную сумму и уже думали продолжать, но "оберег лудомана" - его любимая жена быстро смекнула и взяла ситуацию под свой контроль с помощью жестких мер.
⭐️Лудильная. Подписаться
Ребят, кто впервые на канале сорян, это так отдыхают герои журнала «Лудильная» 👆
Еженедельный дайджест королевского отдыха легендарных персонажей этого канала
Ну и без изюминки не обошлось - про его девушку Карину. Главный оберег лудика пивняка от его проблем.
Их тандем это ппц что за сумбур.
Когда они с Великим в полную нулину обзвонили весь район ради депа, всё замазали, а потом Карина гнала виновника спать. Так же часть этой истории во второй нарезке. И привет раскладу от vladislove666
⭐️Лудильная. Подписаться
custom 546093231563709549334🤣18❤4🥴3
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @GambleTeam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @GambleTeam as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
25 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
44 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Миша Иннер - Покер с Про @mishainner · 20,789 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
ПОКЕРОК @pokerok_official · 48,377 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 September 2026
Блефач | Покер @blefach · 20,049 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лудильная” (@GambleTeam), 12,883 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GambleTeam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
