برترین سخنران انگیزشی و تحول آفرین ایران
بنيانگذار تكنولوژی فكر در ايران
دكترا صنايع و سيستم ها از دانشگاه كاليفرنيا
تلفن پشتیبانی: 02122043081
تلفن مشاوره دوره: 09302342928
www.azmandian.com
Created
30 September 2015 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -572. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,056–40,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 15:40
40,142
-34
15 Sept 2026, 11:02
40,176
-21
13 Sept 2026, 17:56
40,197
-31
12 Sept 2026, 00:19
40,228
-19
9 Sept 2026, 17:17
40,247
-33
6 Sept 2026, 13:01
40,280
-32
4 Sept 2026, 04:59
40,312
-12
2 Sept 2026, 17:55
40,324
-3
1 Sept 2026, 16:33
40,327
-23
31 Aug 2026, 12:53
40,350
-8
30 Aug 2026, 12:17
40,358
-12
29 Aug 2026, 14:19
40,370
-16
28 Aug 2026, 14:24
40,386
-6
27 Aug 2026, 17:49
40,392
-6
26 Aug 2026, 20:42
40,398
-11
25 Aug 2026, 18:18
40,409
-12
24 Aug 2026, 16:57
40,421
-23
22 Aug 2026, 22:37
40,444
-26
21 Aug 2026, 15:16
40,470
-25
20 Aug 2026, 11:48
40,495
first reading
Engagement
5,276 posts held, back to 30 September 2015 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 434 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.40%
avg views ÷ 40,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,770
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.903%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 5,276 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
5,276 (30 September 2015 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
52,840
Reactions total
477
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 23:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,230
Videos
≈1,920
Links
≈649
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 22s
Average length
1m 57s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,343 reactions across 44 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,079
80.3%
👍
73
5.44%
👏
73
5.44%
🙏
47
3.50%
💯
30
2.23%
👌
20
1.49%
🔥
16
1.19%
😍
5
0.372%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 891 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127,232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 June 2021 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⁉️این روزها یک سؤال مدام در ذهن خیلیها تکرار میشود:
«با این شرایط اقتصادی،
واقعاً باید چه کار کرد؟»
اما شاید قبل از پیدا کردن جواب، لازم باشد یک نکته مهم را درباره نوع مواجههمان با این شرایط بدانیم…
این ویدئو را ببینید؛ شاید نگاهتان به نگرانیهای این روزها کمی تغییر کند. 👇
🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DddKMQ9oZDC/?stkn=MTV3ZmViMzU1MWFhbA==
✒️امروز میخواهم صبح را با یک داستان کوتاه شروع کنیم؛ داستانی دربارهی تصمیمهایی که شاید مدتهاست منتظرشان گذاشتهایم.
💬روزی مردی کنار ساحل🌊 ایستاده بود و کشتیهایی ⛴️را تماشا میکرد که یکی پس از دیگری دل به دریا میزدند.
از پیرمردی پرسید:
«این کشتیها چطور جرئت میکنند وارد دریایی شوند که هیچکس نمیداند در آن چه اتفاقی خواهد افتاد؟❓
پیرمرد نگاهی به دریا انداخت و گفت:
«کشتی برای ماندن در بندر ساخته نشده است.»
م…
اما واقعیت این است که اطمینان کامل،
معمولاً قبل از حرکت به وجود نمیآید.
بسیاری از مسیرها را فقط زمانی میتوان
شناخت که قدم اول را برداشته باشیم.
گاهی لازم است حرکت کنیم، یاد بگیریم،
اصلاح کنیم و دوباره حرکت کنیم.
مهم این نیست که دریا همیشه آرام باشد؛
مهم این است که کشتیِ زندگیمان را برای
همیشه در بندر متوقف نکنیم.
⁉️امروز از خودتان بپرسید:
کدام تصمیم، رؤیا یا تغییری در زندگی
من هنوز در بندر مانده است؟
شاید ام…
گاهی مشکل ما کمبود انگیزه نیست؛
زیادیِ حواسپرتی است.
هدف داریم، برنامه هم داریم؛
اما هر روز انرژیمان بین دهها
کار پخش میشود.
آدمِ دیسیپلیندار یاد گرفته بگوید:
«این کار الان مهمتر است؛
پس فعلاً فقط همین.»
🎯 در رشتهاستوری امروز پیج،
درباره همین موضوع صحبت کردهایم؛
دیسیپلین، اولویتبندی و تمرکز
روی کاری که واقعاً باید انجام شود.
📌اگر میخواهی این شنبه را
شروع متفاوتی برای خودت قرار بدهی،
رشتهاستوری امروز ر…
‼️ یک قانون ساده برای این هفته:
اول کار مهم، بعد کارهای دیگر.
هر روز از خودت بپرس:
«اگر امروز فقط قرار باشد یک کار را حتماً انجام بدهم، کدام کار بیشترین تأثیر را روی هدفم دارد؟»
همان را انتخاب کن.
برای انجامش زمان مشخص بگذار.
موبایل و حواسپرتیها را کنار بگذار.
و تا تمامش نکردهای، سراغ کار بعدی نرو.
چون دیسیپلین فقط انجام دادن نیست؛ انتخاب کردن، اولویت دادن و
تمام کردن است.
@dralirezaazmandian
🌱 شنبهها فقط شروع
یک هفته نیستند؛
فرصتیاند برای اصلاح شیوه
زندگی هستند.
📌در کتاب تحصیل
در دانشگاه زندگی آمده:
«تأخیر، قاتل اصلی
موفقیتهای انسان است.»
بیشتر شکستهای ما از ندانستن نیست؛
از بهتعویق انداختن دانستههایمان است.
میدانیم باید شروع کنیم،
اما میگوییم بعداً.
میدانیم باید تمامش کنیم،
اما میگوییم فردا.
میدانیم چه چیزی مهمتر است،
اما وقتمان را صرف چیزهای
کماهمیت میکنیم.
دیسیپلین یعنی فاصله بین
…
✨نوبل تعالی در همه چیز✨
با نوبل خود زیبای خود را زندگی کنید🌹
✔️بروز استعدادها و توانمندیهای شما
✔️کشف و استخراج معدن طلای وجود شما
✔️کشف و یافتن خود زیبای شما
برای مشاوره، اطلاع از دورهی
حضوری نوبل با شمارهی
۰۹۳۰۲۳۴۲۹۲۸
در تماس باشید تا کارشناسان ما شما رو راهنمایی کنند
یا به آیدی زیر شماره تماس بفرستید👇🏻
@doctorrazmandian
📌نوبل چیست؟!
درواقع این دوره، دوره پرورش یک رهبر توانمندی است
که بتواند به زیبایی صحبت کند، سخنرانی کند،
نیرو های انسانی تحت فرمان خودش را مدیریت کند
و به عنوان یک استاد مرجع همه را راهنمایی کند!
شرکت در این دوره پیش نیاز خاصی ندارد، همه با هر تجربه ای می توانند در این دوره شرکت کنند و به یک فرد موفق، یک سخنران، یک کارآفرین و یک کوچ حرفه ای تبدیل بشوند، به طور کل همه ی متخصصین، مدرسین ، سخنرانان، کارآفرینان و مدیران …
✍🏻یک زندگی بهتر را یک انسان بهتر
خلق میکند...
لذا تا تو🫵🏻 بهتر نشوی زندگیت بهتر نخواهد شد
✨این قانون خداست✨
❤16👏8👍1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 5,276 posts we hold for @dralirezaazmandian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگر شخصیت امروزت، قرار باشد آیندهات را بسازد
از آیندهات راضی خواهی بود؟!
بله💪🏻42%
نه خیلی🫠46%
نمیدونم😢14%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 June 2021 to 19 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
16
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
16
vacant every time we have ever looked
@dralirezaazmandian named 16 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dralirezaazmandin named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralirezaazmandia named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@sedaye_shoma_sedaye_zendegi named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@drlirezaazmandian named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralieezaazmandian named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralirezaazmndian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralirezamandian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralrezazmandian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@poshtibanidrazmandian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@poshtibanionlin1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@technologizehn named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@thinktechnology named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralirezaadmandian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralirezaazmadian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralirezaazmandiann named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@dralirezaazmanndian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Night Music @imanmusic2000 · 1,068 (as read 30 August 2026)#65
Parsa marandi @marandi_parsa · 1,210 (as read 30 August 2026)#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تغییر با لذت (باشگاه گلدن تایمی ها) @parisa_ashtiyani · 101,304 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
فوق انگیزشی - قانون جذب @servat75 · 38,463 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
️گروه بینالمللی عرشیان️ @Arshian_International_Group · 85,768 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
فوق انگیزشی | روانشناسی موفقیت @angizeshi75 · 120,895 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
هوش مالی (ماهان تیموری) @hooshemaliii · 84,302 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
دکتر فرهنگ هلاکویی @ma_vaShoma · 103,952 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
پولسازی محمّد بصیری گروه52💚 @basiri7 · 85,232 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
پروژه سوختِ جت 🚀 @SookhteJet · 58,767 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
عرشیانیها 🌺 @arshiyaniha · 63,986 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Gharavi X | قوانین جهان هستى @gharavix · 229,606 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دکتر علیرضا آزمندیان” (@dralirezaazmandian), 40,142 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dralirezaazmandian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.